New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

LPI 701-100 Exam - Topic 12 Question 69 Discussion

Actual exam question for LPI's 701-100 exam
Question #: 69
Topic #: 12
[All 701-100 Questions]

Which statements are true regarding databases during the deployment of a new release of a service using canary deployment? (Choose two correct answers.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Reference https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test-driven_development


by Sunshine at Jun 29, 2024, 11:25 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 701-100 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Quiana
3 months ago
E sounds right, synchronized instances are key for canary deployments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
3 months ago
Wait, D? I thought the database could still be accessed during copying?
upvoted 0 times
...
Pansy
4 months ago
B seems a bit off, traffic shouldn't spike that much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iola
4 months ago
I agree, C is also a must for compatibility!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
4 months ago
A is definitely true, schema changes can slow things down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lewis
4 months ago
I have a vague memory that the database isn't locked during the copy process, so I'm hesitant about option D being correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hobert
4 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think option B could be misleading; I don't recall traffic increasing significantly just because of a new instance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thad
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like the database needs to support all versions of the service during a canary deployment, which makes me lean towards option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
5 months ago
I remember discussing how changes to the database schema can impact performance, so I think option A might be true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
5 months ago
Alright, time to put on my database thinking cap. I'm leaning towards A and B being the correct answers here, but I'll double-check my understanding before submitting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgilio
5 months ago
Oof, database questions are not my strong suit. I'm going to have to really focus on this one. Maybe I can eliminate a couple of the options and then make an educated guess.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
5 months ago
Ah, this is a good one. I'm pretty confident that C is true - the database schema needs to be compatible across all service versions. But the other options have me a bit stumped.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
5 months ago
Okay, let's see here. I think A and B are both true, but I'm not sure about the other options. Gotta be careful with database schema changes and increased traffic during a canary rollout.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reuben
5 months ago
Hmm, this question seems to cover some tricky database concepts related to canary deployments. I'll need to think through the different options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
5 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward IPSec VPN question. I think the key is remembering the two-stage process - the first stage is about establishing the identity of the peers, so the answer is probably IKE SA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reyes
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. The options cover a few different responsibilities of the Service Desk. I'll need to think through each one to determine which is the primary responsibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of confidentiality during audits, so I think option C makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elroy
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards picking E because it seems like all those elements together would give a complete cash picture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Providencia
10 months ago
E is a must, you need that second database instance to handle the traffic. Otherwise, your whole deployment could go up in flames!
upvoted 0 times
Precious
9 months ago
Without the second database instance, the deployment could be at risk of failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrina
9 months ago
I agree, having that second database instance is crucial for handling the increased traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
10 months ago
E is definitely a must for canary deployments.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Julian
10 months ago
Haha, imagine if the database was just a goldfish bowl that they had to transfer between instances. Talk about a 'canary' deployment!
upvoted 0 times
Peggie
9 months ago
E) Canary deployments require two synchronized instances of each database.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
9 months ago
Haha, that would be quite the sight to see! Like passing around a goldfish bowl.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maira
10 months ago
C) The database schema must be compatible to all running versions of a service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reynalda
10 months ago
A) Changes to the database schema can take long and reduce the database performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Catarina
11 months ago
A and B are definitely true. Database schema changes and increased traffic can really impact performance. Better be prepared!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cruz
11 months ago
I'm not sure about D. Wouldn't the database be locked during the entire deployment process, not just while copying the data?
upvoted 0 times
Nu
10 months ago
C) The database schema must be compatible to all running versions of a service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karrie
10 months ago
A) Changes to the database schema can take long and reduce the database performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alida
11 months ago
C and E sound like the right answers to me. Managing database changes during a canary deployment can be tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanesa
11 months ago
I agree with Mira, B and E make more sense in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mira
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe B and E are the correct answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elroy
11 months ago
I think A and C are true.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel