Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

LPI 305-300 Exam - Topic 3 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for LPI's 305-300 exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 3
[All 305-300 Questions]

Which of the following values are valid in the type attribute of a element in a libvirt domain definition? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, E

by Charlene at Sep 16, 2024, 05:13 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 305-300 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Timothy
6 months ago
I’m surprised "Ixc" is even listed here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
6 months ago
I thought "proc" was a valid option?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
6 months ago
Wait, "namespace"? That doesn't sound right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keena
7 months ago
"cgroup" is definitely a valid type too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elizabeth
7 months ago
Pretty sure "kvm" is valid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
7 months ago
I’m pretty certain "proc" isn’t valid, but I’m torn between "kvm" and "cgroup" for the other choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Levi
7 months ago
I feel like "namespace" could be a valid type, but I can't recall if it was specifically mentioned in the study materials.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
7 months ago
I remember practicing a question about domain types, and I think "cgroup" might be valid too, but I could be mixing it up with something else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristal
8 months ago
I think "kvm" is definitely one of the valid options, but I'm not sure about the second one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graciela
8 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to review the libvirt documentation carefully to make sure I select the correct two options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarita
8 months ago
I'm pretty confident I know the answer to this one. The valid type attribute values are "kvm" and "cgroup" based on my experience with libvirt.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marg
8 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a good handle on the libvirt domain definition. Based on my understanding, the valid type attribute values are "kvm" and "cgroup". Let me double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
8 months ago
I'm not too familiar with the libvirt domain definition, so I'll need to do some research on the available type attribute options before attempting this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chi
8 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the libvirt domain definition documentation to identify the valid type attribute values.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
8 months ago
Okay, let's see. I remember that EXPDP and IMPDP are the command-line tools for Data Pump, so option A seems right. But I'm not sure about the other statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
1 year ago
Proc? Seriously? I thought that was for the kernel process, not virtualization. This exam is really trying to trip us up!
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
1 year ago
Ah, this is a tricky one. I'd go with B and D - namespace and cgroup. Doesn't the libvirt documentation mention those as valid options?
upvoted 0 times
Antonio
11 months ago
Ixc doesn't sound familiar to me. I would go with cgroup as one of the valid options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquita
11 months ago
I'm not sure about namespace, but I know for sure that cgroup is a valid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sunny
12 months ago
I think you're right. Namespace and cgroup seem to be valid options for the type attribute.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alonso
1 year ago
Haha, Ixc? Really? That's gotta be a trick answer. I'm sticking with C and D as my choices.
upvoted 0 times
Lacey
11 months ago
Yeah, Ixc definitely seems out of place. C and D seem like the most valid options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladis
1 year ago
I'm going with C and D as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adela
1 year ago
I agree, Ixc does seem like a trick answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Derrick
1 year ago
Wait, isn't proc a valid option too? I thought the type attribute could be used to specify different types of virtualization technologies.
upvoted 0 times
Trina
1 year ago
I agree, 'cgroup' is another valid option for the type attribute.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
1 year ago
I'm not sure about 'namespace', I think it might not be a valid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lewis
1 year ago
I think 'kvm' is also a valid option for the type attribute.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
1 year ago
Yes, you are correct. 'proc' is a valid option for the type attribute.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carline
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is C and D. KVM and cgroup seem like valid options for the type attribute of a libvirt domain definition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
1 year ago
I'm not sure about namespace, but I think D) cgroup could also be a valid value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
1 year ago
I agree with Pete, proc and kvm make sense for the type attribute.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
1 year ago
I think A) proc and C) kvm are valid values.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel