Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

LPI 202-450 Exam - Topic 7 Question 106 Discussion

Actual exam question for LPI's 202-450 exam

Question #: 106
Topic #: 7

[All 202-450 Questions]

Which of the following lines is valid in a configuration file in /etc/pam.d/?

Aauthrequired pam_unix.sotry_first_pass nullok

Bauthtry_first_pass nullok, require pam_unix.so

Cauthrequired:pam_unix.so(try_first_pass nullok)

Dauthpam_unix.so(required try_first_pass nullok)

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Jerrod at Jan 26, 2025, 09:30 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 202-450 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Doyle

9 months ago

Wait, are we sure any of these are valid? They all look weird!

upvoted 0 times

...

Emiko

9 months ago

D seems off too, where's the space after auth?

upvoted 0 times

...

Ilene

9 months ago

C is definitely not valid, the syntax is all wrong.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noah

10 months ago

I think B is the correct format, looks good to me!

upvoted 0 times

...

Florinda

10 months ago

Option A has a typo, should be pam_unix.so not pam_unix.sotry.

upvoted 0 times

...

Weldon

10 months ago

I’m pretty sure "auth" should be followed by "required" or "requisite," but I can't recall if "try_first_pass" goes before or after "pam_unix.so."

upvoted 0 times

...

Nadine

10 months ago

I think option C looks familiar, but I’m not confident about the colons and parentheses being used correctly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pamella

10 months ago

I remember practicing with PAM configurations, and I feel like "auth required" is the right format, but I'm not sure about the rest.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yoko

11 months ago

I think option A has some syntax issues, but I can't remember exactly what they are.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yuonne

11 months ago

I feel pretty confident about this one. The valid line is definitely option C, with the correct syntax for the pam_unix.so module.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eric

11 months ago

Okay, I've got a strategy for this. I'll carefully read through each option and compare it to the PAM syntax I'm familiar with.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cecily

11 months ago

Ah, I think I've seen this type of configuration before. Let me think through the options and see if I can spot the valid line.

upvoted 0 times

...

Freida

11 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the correct syntax here. I'll need to double-check the PAM documentation to make sure I understand the proper format.

upvoted 0 times

...

Matthew

11 months ago

This looks like a tricky PAM configuration question. I'll need to carefully review the syntax and options to determine the valid line.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wade

2 years ago

Ah, the age-old question of which PAM syntax to use. I say we just throw all the options into the config and see what happens! Chaos is the true path to enlightenment.

upvoted 0 times

Stefany

1 year ago

User4: Why not try all the options and see which one works best? Chaos can sometimes lead to unexpected solutions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Agustin

1 year ago

User2: I think option B is the way to go, it seems more secure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elise

1 year ago

User3: I'm not sure about any of these options, maybe we should consult the documentation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fidelia

1 year ago

User1: Let's go with option A, it looks good to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Kris

2 years ago

I'm feeling lucky, let's go with option A! Who needs to read the manual when you can just guess, right? *wink*

upvoted 0 times

Marla

1 year ago

User 4: Yeah, it's always better to be safe than sorry.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jamal

1 year ago

User 3: Let's not take any chances, let's look it up to be sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Keshia

1 year ago

User 2: I'm not so sure about that, maybe we should double check.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mozell

2 years ago

User 1: I think option A is correct.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Johana

2 years ago

That makes sense, thanks for explaining.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tammy

2 years ago

Because the format 'authrequired:pam_unix.so(try_first_pass nullok)' seems more logical to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Honey

2 years ago

Ah, the old 'authtry_first_pass' typo. Classic PAM question! I'm going with option B, looks legit to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Raylene

2 years ago

Option D looks interesting, but I'm not sure about the parentheses. I'll have to double-check the PAM documentation on that one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Johana

2 years ago

Why do you think C is the correct answer?

upvoted 0 times

...

Tammy

2 years ago

I disagree, I believe it's C.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronnie

2 years ago

Hmm, I think option C is the correct one. The syntax looks correct with the required keyword and the try_first_pass nullok options.

upvoted 0 times

Carline

2 years ago

User2: Yeah, option C seems to be the most valid choice for a configuration file in /etc/pam.d.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malika

2 years ago

User1: I think option C is correct too. It has the required keyword and the try_first_pass nullok options.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Johana

2 years ago

I think the correct answer is A.

upvoted 0 times

...