Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

LPI 202-450 Exam - Topic 5 Question 82 Discussion

Posted by Jesusita on Mar 06, 2024 at 09:39 AM

The following Apache HTTPD configuration has been set up to create a virtual host available at www.example.com and www2.example.com:

Even though Apache HTTPD correctly processed the configuration file, requests to both names are not handled correctly. What should be changed in order to ensure correct operations?

Suggested Answer: B, D, E

Get Premium 202-450 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
40 comments · newest first
KA
Karma 11 months ago
B seems off. The port doesn't need to be in the ServerName, right?
RI
Rima 11 months ago
D sounds correct to me. Both names should be in the VirtualHost tag.
FL
Fletcher 11 months ago
Surprised that people think A is right. Isn't it okay to have multiple names?
CH
Charolette 12 months ago
I think E makes more sense. ServerAlias is super handy!
KR
Krissy 12 months ago
A is definitely the way to go. Each needs its own section.
MA
Mammie 12 months ago
I vaguely remember that the opening VirtualHost tag needs to specify both names, but I’m not entirely confident about that.
CH
Chau 1 year ago
I feel like the ServerName can only have one value, so maybe we need to use ServerAlias for the second name?
SA
Sang 1 year ago
I think I practiced a question where the ServerAlias was important, but I can't recall the exact details.
LO
Lorenza 1 year ago
I remember something about needing separate VirtualHost sections for different names, but I'm not sure if that's the only requirement.
AL
Alline 1 year ago
Alright, time to put my Apache knowledge to the test. I'm feeling confident I can figure out the right fix for this problem.
LO
Lonna 1 year ago
I think I've got an idea on this one. The key might be in how the virtual host names are defined. I'll focus on that and see if I can come up with the right solution.
SH
Sharee 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this one. The configuration seems to be set up correctly, so I'm not sure what the issue could be. I'll have to re-read the question and options carefully.
JO
Joaquin 1 year ago
Hmm, this looks tricky. I'll need to carefully review the Apache configuration details to figure out what's going on here.
GL
Glory 1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The question is asking what needs to be changed to ensure correct operations, so I'll need to analyze the configuration closely.
DA
Dana 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording here. What exactly is a "CPE device" and how does the firmware upgrade process work for the primary and standby areas? I'll need to think this through carefully.
LA
Lang 1 year ago
I remember learning about the differences between crypto and fiat in class. I'm pretty confident B. False is the right answer here.
IN
Inocencia 1 year ago
I'm confident that the correct answer is C. Commas are the way to go when you need to associate multiple host names with a single virtual host.
OL
Olga 1 year ago
↳ replying to Inocencia
I agree with you, C is the correct answer. Multiple host names should be placed as comma separated values in one ServerName declaration.
LO
Lorrie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Inocencia
I believe the answer is D. Both virtual host names should be mentioned in the opening VirtualHost tag.
VI
Vince 1 year ago
↳ replying to Inocencia
I think the correct answer is E. You can have multiple names declared in ServerAlias options.
CR
Craig 1 year ago
Haha, this question is a real head-scratcher! I bet the exam writers are chuckling at the poor souls who get this one wrong.
WI
Willard 1 year ago
↳ replying to Craig
I know, right? These exam questions can be tricky sometimes!
PA
Pamella 1 year ago
↳ replying to Craig
E) Only one Server name declaration may exist, but additional names can be declared in ServerAlias options.
KR
Kristian 1 year ago
↳ replying to Craig
A) The configuration must be split into two VirtualHost sections since each virtual host may only have one name.
RO
Ronnie 1 year ago
I'm a bit stumped on this one. I'm going to have to double-check the Apache documentation to make sure I understand the proper way to set up virtual hosts.
AL
Aleshia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ronnie
E) Only one Server name declaration may exist, but additional names can be declared in ServerAlias options.
ST
Starr 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ronnie
C) Both virtual host names have to be placed as comma separated values in one ServerName declaration.
FL
Floyd 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ronnie
B) The port mentioned in opening VirtualHost tag has to be appended to the ServerName declaration's values.
NO
Norah 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ronnie
A) The configuration must be split into two VirtualHost sections since each virtual host may only have one name.
ST
Stanton 2 years ago
Hmm, I was thinking it might be E. Putting the additional names in ServerAlias sounds like the right approach to me.
AL
Alfreda 2 years ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is C. The configuration should have both virtual host names listed as comma-separated values in the ServerName declaration.
KR
Kris 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alfreda
I agree with you, the correct answer is C. Both virtual host names should be placed as comma separated values in one ServerName declaration.
DO
Dona 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alfreda
Actually, I think the answer is A. The configuration must be split into two VirtualHost sections.
TR
Trinidad 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alfreda
No, I believe the correct answer is D. Both virtual host names should be mentioned in the opening VirtualHost tag.
GL
Gladys 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alfreda
Yes, that makes sense. Having both names in one ServerName declaration should fix the issue.
AL
Alison 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alfreda
I think you're right, C seems like the correct answer.
CA
Candida 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alfreda
I think the answer is E. You can have multiple names declared in ServerAlias options.
AA
Aaron 2 years ago
But wouldn't it make more sense to have multiple ServerAlias options instead of multiple ServerName declarations?
KA
Karon 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
AA
Aaron 2 years ago
I think the answer is E.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel