MENU
Performing a DNS lookup with dig results in this answer:
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium 202-450 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
34 comments · newest first
OZ
Ozell
10 months ago
D sounds off, the NS definition shouldn't need changes.
VI
Vilma
11 months ago
I'm leaning towards C, seems more accurate to me.
ED
Edna
11 months ago
Wait, is it really that simple? I have my doubts.
JU
Julio
11 months ago
Totally agree with A, that's a common mistake!
VE
Venita
11 months ago
I think it's option A, no dot in the PTR record.
CE
Celeste
12 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen something about needing a dot in the NS definition before. Maybe option D is the right answer?
DE
Dean
12 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the difference between forward and reverse lookup zones. Could it be option A instead?
HE
Hermila
12 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where the dot placement was crucial. It could be option C, but I need to double-check.
TI
Tijuana
1 year ago
I think the issue might be with the PTR record in the reverse lookup zone file, but I'm not entirely sure.
TE
Terrilyn
1 year ago
This is a good test of my DNS knowledge. I'll methodically go through each option and match it to the dig output to find the correct answer.
GA
Gabriele
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the different options. I'll need to double-check my understanding of DNS zone file syntax to determine the right answer.
KA
Katina
1 year ago
Okay, I think I see the issue here. The key is to identify the problem with the PTR record in the forward or reverse lookup zone file.
CR
Cristy
1 year ago
Hmm, the dig output shows some interesting details. I'll need to analyze the PTR record format and reverse lookup zone file to figure this out.
KA
Katheryn
1 year ago
This looks like a tricky DNS question. I'll need to carefully review the dig output and think through the zone file structure.
AP
Apolonia
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a lot of different changes to make. I better read through the question carefully and make sure I don't miss anything. Gotta make sure I select the right combination of workflow elements.
CO
Coral
1 year ago
We did practice questions on this, and I vaguely recall that removing comments from HTML could speed things up a bit, but I'm wondering if that's enough in this case.
AS
Ashlee
1 year ago
I'm pretty confident the answer is A. Salicylates are known to stop and often reverse the progressive joint involvement in rheumatoid arthritis.
BA
Basilia
1 year ago
No . after linuserv? That's like leaving out the salt in a recipe, not cool!
SO
Sol
1 year ago
D) The . in the NS definition in the reverse lookup zone has to be removed
MA
Maybelle
1 year ago
C) There is no . after linuserv.example.net in the PTR record in the reverse lookup zone file
AI
Aide
1 year ago
B) There is no . after linuserv in the PTR record in the forward lookup zone file
MI
Micaela
1 year ago
A) There is no . after linuserv.example.net in the PTR record in the forward lookup zone file
AL
Alline
1 year ago
A DNS lookup with dig, eh? Looks like I'm about to get my geek on.
CH
Cheryl
1 year ago
The NS definition in the reverse lookup zone? I bet that's the culprit. *scratches head*
AN
Antonio
1 year ago
Hmm, the reverse lookup zone file, huh? Time to brush up on my DNS knowledge.
CH
Chu
1 year ago
C) There is no . after linuserv.example.net in the PTR record in the reverse lookup zone file
DA
Dan
1 year ago
B) There is no . after linuserv in the PTR record in the forward lookup zone file
ES
Estrella
1 year ago
A) There is no . after linuserv.example.net in the PTR record in the forward lookup zone file
CA
Carrol
1 year ago
Wait, there's a . after linuserv.example.net? Gotta double-check that in the zone file!
RO
Royal
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. Let's make sure to check the zone file for that.
TR
Truman
1 year ago
User 1: I think the answer is A) There is no . after linuserv.example.net in the PTR record in the forward lookup zone file
LA
Lang
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think the . in the NS definition in the reverse lookup zone has to be removed, so the answer might be D).
LE
Lenny
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) There is no . after linuserv.example.net in the PTR record in the reverse lookup zone file.
MA
Major
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) There is no . after linuserv.example.net in the PTR record in the forward lookup zone file.