Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

LPI 202-450 Exam - Topic 3 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for LPI's 202-450 exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 3
[All 202-450 Questions]

Performing a DNS lookup with dig results in this answer:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Sherrell at Jun 23, 2024, 04:31 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 202-450 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ozell
5 months ago
D sounds off, the NS definition shouldn't need changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vilma
6 months ago
I'm leaning towards C, seems more accurate to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
6 months ago
Wait, is it really that simple? I have my doubts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
6 months ago
Totally agree with A, that's a common mistake!
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
6 months ago
I think it's option A, no dot in the PTR record.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
7 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen something about needing a dot in the NS definition before. Maybe option D is the right answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
7 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the difference between forward and reverse lookup zones. Could it be option A instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
7 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where the dot placement was crucial. It could be option C, but I need to double-check.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
7 months ago
I think the issue might be with the PTR record in the reverse lookup zone file, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
7 months ago
This is a good test of my DNS knowledge. I'll methodically go through each option and match it to the dig output to find the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
7 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the different options. I'll need to double-check my understanding of DNS zone file syntax to determine the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
7 months ago
Okay, I think I see the issue here. The key is to identify the problem with the PTR record in the forward or reverse lookup zone file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
7 months ago
Hmm, the dig output shows some interesting details. I'll need to analyze the PTR record format and reverse lookup zone file to figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katheryn
7 months ago
This looks like a tricky DNS question. I'll need to carefully review the dig output and think through the zone file structure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Apolonia
7 months ago
Hmm, this is a lot of different changes to make. I better read through the question carefully and make sure I don't miss anything. Gotta make sure I select the right combination of workflow elements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
7 months ago
We did practice questions on this, and I vaguely recall that removing comments from HTML could speed things up a bit, but I'm wondering if that's enough in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlee
8 months ago
I'm pretty confident the answer is A. Salicylates are known to stop and often reverse the progressive joint involvement in rheumatoid arthritis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Basilia
12 months ago
No . after linuserv? That's like leaving out the salt in a recipe, not cool!
upvoted 0 times
Sol
10 months ago
D) The . in the NS definition in the reverse lookup zone has to be removed
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
10 months ago
C) There is no . after linuserv.example.net in the PTR record in the reverse lookup zone file
upvoted 0 times
...
Aide
11 months ago
B) There is no . after linuserv in the PTR record in the forward lookup zone file
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
11 months ago
A) There is no . after linuserv.example.net in the PTR record in the forward lookup zone file
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alline
12 months ago
A DNS lookup with dig, eh? Looks like I'm about to get my geek on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryl
1 year ago
The NS definition in the reverse lookup zone? I bet that's the culprit. *scratches head*
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
1 year ago
Hmm, the reverse lookup zone file, huh? Time to brush up on my DNS knowledge.
upvoted 0 times
Chu
11 months ago
C) There is no . after linuserv.example.net in the PTR record in the reverse lookup zone file
upvoted 0 times
...
Dan
11 months ago
B) There is no . after linuserv in the PTR record in the forward lookup zone file
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
11 months ago
A) There is no . after linuserv.example.net in the PTR record in the forward lookup zone file
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carrol
1 year ago
Wait, there's a . after linuserv.example.net? Gotta double-check that in the zone file!
upvoted 0 times
Royal
12 months ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. Let's make sure to check the zone file for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
1 year ago
User 1: I think the answer is A) There is no . after linuserv.example.net in the PTR record in the forward lookup zone file
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lang
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think the . in the NS definition in the reverse lookup zone has to be removed, so the answer might be D).
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenny
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) There is no . after linuserv.example.net in the PTR record in the reverse lookup zone file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Major
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) There is no . after linuserv.example.net in the PTR record in the forward lookup zone file.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel