Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

LPI 202-450 Exam - Topic 3 Question 90 Discussion

Performing a DNS lookup with dig results in this answer:
D) The . in the NS definition in the reverse lookup zone has to be removed
A) There is no . after linuserv.example.net in the PTR record in the forward lookup zone file
B) There is no . after linuserv in the PTR record in the forward lookup zone file
C) There is no . after linuserv.example.net in the PTR record in the reverse lookup zone file

LPI 202-450 Exam - Topic 3 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for LPI's 202-450 exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 3
[All 202-450 Questions]

Performing a DNS lookup with dig results in this answer:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Sherrell at Jun 23, 2024, 04:31 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 202-450 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ozell
9 months ago
D sounds off, the NS definition shouldn't need changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vilma
9 months ago
I'm leaning towards C, seems more accurate to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
9 months ago
Wait, is it really that simple? I have my doubts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
10 months ago
Totally agree with A, that's a common mistake!
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
10 months ago
I think it's option A, no dot in the PTR record.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
10 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen something about needing a dot in the NS definition before. Maybe option D is the right answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the difference between forward and reverse lookup zones. Could it be option A instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
10 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where the dot placement was crucial. It could be option C, but I need to double-check.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
11 months ago
I think the issue might be with the PTR record in the reverse lookup zone file, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
11 months ago
This is a good test of my DNS knowledge. I'll methodically go through each option and match it to the dig output to find the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the different options. I'll need to double-check my understanding of DNS zone file syntax to determine the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
11 months ago
Okay, I think I see the issue here. The key is to identify the problem with the PTR record in the forward or reverse lookup zone file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
11 months ago
Hmm, the dig output shows some interesting details. I'll need to analyze the PTR record format and reverse lookup zone file to figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katheryn
11 months ago
This looks like a tricky DNS question. I'll need to carefully review the dig output and think through the zone file structure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Apolonia
11 months ago
Hmm, this is a lot of different changes to make. I better read through the question carefully and make sure I don't miss anything. Gotta make sure I select the right combination of workflow elements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
11 months ago
We did practice questions on this, and I vaguely recall that removing comments from HTML could speed things up a bit, but I'm wondering if that's enough in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlee
11 months ago
I'm pretty confident the answer is A. Salicylates are known to stop and often reverse the progressive joint involvement in rheumatoid arthritis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Basilia
1 year ago
No . after linuserv? That's like leaving out the salt in a recipe, not cool!
upvoted 0 times
Sol
1 year ago
D) The . in the NS definition in the reverse lookup zone has to be removed
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
1 year ago
C) There is no . after linuserv.example.net in the PTR record in the reverse lookup zone file
upvoted 0 times
...
Aide
1 year ago
B) There is no . after linuserv in the PTR record in the forward lookup zone file
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
1 year ago
A) There is no . after linuserv.example.net in the PTR record in the forward lookup zone file
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alline
1 year ago
A DNS lookup with dig, eh? Looks like I'm about to get my geek on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryl
1 year ago
The NS definition in the reverse lookup zone? I bet that's the culprit. *scratches head*
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
1 year ago
Hmm, the reverse lookup zone file, huh? Time to brush up on my DNS knowledge.
upvoted 0 times
Chu
1 year ago
C) There is no . after linuserv.example.net in the PTR record in the reverse lookup zone file
upvoted 0 times
...
Dan
1 year ago
B) There is no . after linuserv in the PTR record in the forward lookup zone file
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
1 year ago
A) There is no . after linuserv.example.net in the PTR record in the forward lookup zone file
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carrol
1 year ago
Wait, there's a . after linuserv.example.net? Gotta double-check that in the zone file!
upvoted 0 times
Royal
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. Let's make sure to check the zone file for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
1 year ago
User 1: I think the answer is A) There is no . after linuserv.example.net in the PTR record in the forward lookup zone file
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lang
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think the . in the NS definition in the reverse lookup zone has to be removed, so the answer might be D).
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenny
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) There is no . after linuserv.example.net in the PTR record in the reverse lookup zone file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Major
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) There is no . after linuserv.example.net in the PTR record in the forward lookup zone file.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel