Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper JN0-683 Exam - Topic 6 Question 36 Discussion

Posted by Janine on Apr 11, 2026 at 10:52 AM

You are designing an IP fabric tor a large data center, and you are concerned about growth and scalability. Which two actions would you take to address these concerns? (Choose two.)

Suggested Answer: B, D

Clos IP Fabric Design:

A Clos fabric is a network topology designed for scalable, high-performance data centers. It is typically arranged in multiple stages, providing redundancy, high bandwidth, and low latency.

Three-Stage Clos Fabric:

Option B: A three-stage Clos fabric, consisting of leaf, spine, and super spine layers, is widely used in data centers. This design scales well and allows for easy expansion by adding more leaf and spine devices as needed.

Super Spines for Scalability:

Option D: Using high-capacity devices like the QFX5700 Series as super spines can handle the increased traffic demands in large data centers and support future growth. These devices provide the necessary bandwidth and scalability for large-scale deployments.

Conclusion:

Option B: Correct---A three-stage Clos fabric is a proven design that addresses growth and scalability concerns in large data centers.

Option D: Correct---QFX5700 Series devices are suitable for use as super spines in large-scale environments due to their high performance.


Get Premium JN0-683 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
21 comments · newest first
MA
Malcolm 1 month ago
A and D cover both scalability and performance well.
PA
Pamella 1 month ago
A and C could work, but A is definitely better.
TW
Twila 1 month ago
C is good, but I prefer D for super spine.
SA
Sanda 2 months ago
B is too limited for a large data center.
VE
Vesta 2 months ago
I agree, A is solid for growth. D gives high performance.
AN
Antonio 2 months ago
I think A and D are the best choices. Five-stage is scalable.
TY
Tyra 2 months ago
A and D cover scalability well. Good combo!
AJ
Aja 2 months ago
A and C could work, but D is more future-proof.
DE
Denae 2 months ago
C is good, but I prefer D for super spine.
MA
Marti 3 months ago
B seems too limited for growth. A is definitely better.
SY
Sylvia 3 months ago
I agree, A is solid. D offers great performance too.
AN
Annalee 3 months ago
I think A and D are the best choices. Five-stage Clos is scalable.
LU
Luisa 3 months ago
A is a must for growth, no doubt!
MA
Maryann 3 months ago
Definitely A, but not sure about D.
AN
Antione 4 months ago
Surprised that people still use EX4300 for spines!
AL
Almeta 5 months ago
I think B is better for smaller setups.
SH
Sharee 5 months ago
A and D are solid choices for scalability.
BI
Billye 6 months ago
I recall that super spine designs are crucial for handling growth, but I can't remember if the EX4300s can handle that load effectively.
MA
Mariann 6 months ago
I practiced a similar question where using EX4300s as spines was mentioned, but I feel like the OFX5700s might be a better choice for larger deployments.
JU
Justine 6 months ago
I think the three-stage Clos design might be more cost-effective, but I’m not confident about its scalability compared to the five-stage.
MI
Michal 6 months ago
I remember studying the benefits of a five-stage Clos fabric for scalability, but I'm not entirely sure if it's always necessary.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel