Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Juniper JN0-683 Exam - Topic 6 Question 21 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-683 exam
Question #: 21
Topic #: 6
[All JN0-683 Questions]

Exhibit.

Connections between hosts connected to Leaf-1 and Leaf-2 are not working correctly.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, E

Issue Analysis:

The problem in the exhibit suggests a mismatch in configuration parameters between Leaf-1 and Leaf-2, leading to communication issues between hosts connected to these leaf devices.

Configuration Mismatches:

Service-ID: Leaf-1 has service-id 1 configured, while Leaf-2 does not have this parameter. For consistency and proper operation, the service-id should be the same across both leaf devices.

VRF Target: Leaf-1 is configured with vrf-target target:65000:1, while Leaf-2 is configured with vrf-target target:65000:2. To allow proper VRF import/export between the two leafs, these should match.

Corrective Actions:

C . Configure the set switch-options vrf-target target:65000:1 parameter on Leaf-2: This aligns the VRF targets between the two leaf devices, ensuring they can correctly import and export routes.

E . Configure the set switch-options service-id 1 parameter on Leaf-2: This ensures that both Leaf-1 and Leaf-2 use the same service ID, which is necessary for consistency in the EVPN-VXLAN setup.

Data Center Reference:

Correct configuration of VRF targets and service IDs is critical in EVPN-VXLAN setups to ensure that routes and services are correctly shared and recognized between different devices in the network fabric.


by Royal at May 01, 2025, 07:04 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium JN0-683 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Delsie
5 months ago
Leaf-2's service-id might also need a look.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorita
5 months ago
Totally agree, that’s definitely one of the fixes!
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlette
5 months ago
I think we need to set the vtep-source-interface on Leaf-1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
6 months ago
Wait, are we sure the route-distinguisher is even an issue here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
6 months ago
Not so sure about the vrf-target change on Leaf-2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
6 months ago
I have a hunch that the service-id on Leaf-2 is necessary, but I’m not confident about the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
6 months ago
I think the route-distinguisher option on Leaf-1 could be important, but I can't recall the exact details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casandra
7 months ago
This question feels similar to one we practiced where we had to set the vrf-target. I think that might be relevant here too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
7 months ago
I remember something about configuring the vtep-source-interface, but I'm not entirely sure if it was for Leaf-1 or Leaf-2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
7 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. Based on the information provided, I believe the correct configuration changes are B and C. I'll double-check my work, but I'm feeling confident about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
7 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. The exhibit doesn't provide a lot of detail, and the configuration options seem quite specific. I'll need to think this through carefully to make sure I select the right changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
7 months ago
Alright, I think I've got a plan. I'll start by looking at the exhibit and understanding the network topology. Then I'll review the configuration options and see which two would best address the connectivity issue between Leaf-1 and Leaf-2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Horace
8 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The question is asking for two configuration changes, so I'll need to identify the two most relevant options from the choices provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
8 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully analyze the exhibit and the options to figure out the right configuration changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
11 months ago
Hold up, did someone say 'leaf'? I thought we were talking about trees, not networks! Anyways, I'd go with B and D. Just my two cents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
11 months ago
Ahh, the joys of networking... B and E, my friend. Leaf-2 needs that service-id, for sure. Now, where's my coffee?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tommy
11 months ago
Aha, I got this! B and D are the answers. Just gotta get that VTEP source interface and route distinguisher right, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Joseph
11 months ago
Great job figuring that out!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
11 months ago
That's it! Once you make those changes, the connections between hosts should start working correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
11 months ago
Make sure to configure the VTEP source interface on Leaf-1 and the route distinguisher on Leaf-1 as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cora
11 months ago
Yeah, you're right. B and D are the correct answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stefany
12 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. Let me think... I'd say B and C are the way to go. Gotta love those networking puzzles!
upvoted 0 times
Georgeanna
10 months ago
Great, let's make those changes and see if the connections between hosts start working correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amos
11 months ago
I agree, configuring the vtep-source-interface on Leaf-1 and the vrf-target on Leaf-2 should fix the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walton
11 months ago
I think B and C are the correct configurations to solve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kanisha
1 year ago
I think D and E are not needed, the correct answers are definitely B and C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabra
1 year ago
The problem seems to be with the VTEP configuration. I think options B and D are the correct choices.
upvoted 0 times
Portia
11 months ago
Great, let's implement options B and D and see if that resolves the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
11 months ago
Let's make those changes then. It should fix the issue with the connections between hosts on Leaf-1 and Leaf-2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Esteban
11 months ago
I agree. Option D is also necessary. Configuring the set switch-options route-distinguisher i92.168.100.50:i parameter on Leaf-1 will help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
12 months ago
Option B is correct. We need to configure the set switch-options vtep-source-interface irb.0 parameter on Leaf-1.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gilma
1 year ago
I'm not sure, I think D and E could also be necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vashti
1 year ago
I agree with Arlette, those configurations seem to be the most relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
1 year ago
I think the correct answers are B and C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel