Juniper JN0-683 Exam - Topic 4 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-683 exam

Question #: 7
Topic #: 4

You are adding a server lo a tenant's network within your data center and must limit access to a specific traffic type within the tenant network without pushing all tenant traffic through a firewall.

What will satisfy this requirement?

AUse route leaking with EVPN and a routing policy.

BUse filter-based forwarding.

CPut the new server on a unique subnet within the tenant's network.

DUse a static route in the tenant VRF with a firewall as the next hop for traffic to the new server.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B, C, E

Understanding ERB Architecture:

ERB (Edge Routed Bridging) architecture is a network design where the routing occurs at the edge (leaf devices) rather than in the spine devices. In a VXLAN overlay network with EVPN as the control plane, leaf devices typically act as both Layer 2 (L2) and Layer 3 (L3) VXLAN gateways.

Placement of VXLAN Gateways:

Option B: All leaf devices will have L2 VXLAN gateways to handle the bridging of VLAN traffic into VXLAN tunnels.

Option C: All leaf devices will also have L3 VXLAN gateways to route traffic between different VXLAN segments (VNIs) and external networks.

Option E: Spine devices in an ERB architecture generally do not function as VXLAN gateways. They primarily focus on forwarding traffic between leaf nodes and do not handle VXLAN encapsulation/decapsulation.

Conclusion:

Option B: Correct---All leaf devices will have L2 VXLAN gateways.

Option C: Correct---All leaf devices will have L3 VXLAN gateways.

Option E: Correct---Spine devices will not act as VXLAN gateways

by Billye at Sep 15, 2024, 02:56 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium JN0-683 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Keva

6 months ago

Wait, can you really do that without a firewall?

upvoted 0 times

...

Leatha

6 months ago

D just adds unnecessary complexity, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Marvel

6 months ago

C sounds too simple, not sure it would work.

upvoted 0 times

...

Graciela

7 months ago

I think B is better for filtering traffic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Thurman

7 months ago

A is the way to go with EVPN!

upvoted 0 times

...

Laticia

7 months ago

I feel like using a static route with a firewall as the next hop could be overkill for this scenario, but it might be worth considering.

upvoted 0 times

...

Louis

7 months ago

Putting the server on a unique subnet seems like a straightforward approach, but I'm not convinced it fully limits access as required.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ludivina

7 months ago

I remember practicing with filter-based forwarding, so option B might be the right choice, but I need to double-check the specifics.

upvoted 0 times

...

Colette

8 months ago

I think option A sounds familiar, but I'm not entirely sure how route leaking works in this context.

upvoted 0 times

...

Thersa

8 months ago

This is a tricky one, but I'm feeling confident. I'm leaning towards option B, filter-based forwarding, as it seems to directly address the requirement of limiting access without a firewall.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mila

8 months ago

Based on the details provided, I think option A with EVPN and a routing policy could be a good solution. It seems like it would allow me to control the traffic without a full firewall.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gaynell

8 months ago

I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. Does "route leaking" mean something specific in this context? I'll need to review that concept before deciding.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorethea

8 months ago

Okay, let's see. The key here is limiting access to a specific traffic type without going through a firewall. I think option B, using filter-based forwarding, might be the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chara

8 months ago

Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the options carefully to make sure I understand the requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Henriette

8 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. Does the fact that Unit A has those extra profile options mean that all transactions get automatically assigned there, or is it just that Paul can only create them for that unit? I'll have to re-read it carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adolph

1 year ago

Hmm, I wonder if we can use a magic spell to teleport the new server into a secure bubble. Might be faster than these networking options!

upvoted 0 times

Jodi

11 months ago

C) Put the new server on a unique subnet within the tenant's network.

upvoted 0 times

...

Candida

12 months ago

B) Use filter-based forwarding.

upvoted 0 times

...

Penney

12 months ago

A) Use route leaking with EVPN and a routing policy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Susana

1 year ago

Hey, at least they're not asking us to set up a firewall made of duct tape and paperclips! That's progress, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Diego

1 year ago

D) is a valid choice, but using a static route with a firewall as the next hop feels a bit clunky. I'd prefer a more dynamic solution if possible.

upvoted 0 times

Haley

1 year ago

D) Use a static route in the tenant VRF with a firewall as the next hop for traffic to the new server.

upvoted 0 times

...

Torie

1 year ago

B) Use filter-based forwarding.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tarra

1 year ago

A) Use route leaking with EVPN and a routing policy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felicidad

1 year ago

C) is an interesting option, but I'm not sure it fully satisfies the requirement of limiting access without going through a firewall.

upvoted 0 times

Leslie

12 months ago

C) Put the new server on a unique subnet within the tenant's network.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marylin

12 months ago

B) Use filter-based forwarding.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delila

1 year ago

A) Use route leaking with EVPN and a routing policy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shoshana

1 year ago

I'm leaning towards A) with the EVPN route leaking. That seems like a more elegant and scalable approach compared to the other options.

upvoted 0 times

Lenita

1 year ago

User 2: Yeah, it's definitely a more elegant solution compared to the other choices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Amalia

1 year ago

User 1: I agree, using route leaking with EVPN seems like the best option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lynette

1 year ago

Hmm, I think B) is the way to go. Filter-based forwarding sounds like the perfect solution to limit access without going through a firewall.

upvoted 0 times

...

Floyd

1 year ago

Hmm, I see your point. But I still think option A) provides more flexibility and control over the traffic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ria

1 year ago

I disagree, I believe option B) using filter-based forwarding would be a better solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Floyd

1 year ago

I think option A) using route leaking with EVPN and a routing policy could work.

upvoted 0 times

...