Juniper Exam JN0-682 Topic 6 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-682 exam

Question #: 50
Topic #: 6

You are asked to manage the oversubscription ratio of your spine and leaf IP fabric. You

determine that you are at a 3:1 ratio of downstream to upstream traffic and must achieve a 1.1ratio. In this scenario, which two actions would you take to achieve this goal? (Choose two.)

AReduce the number of leaf nodes on your design.

BIncrease the number of spine nodes in your design.

CIncrease the number of server facing ports that each leaf node uses to carry traffic.

DReduce the number of server facing that each leaf node uses to carry traffic.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, D

by Johnna at Jul 11, 2024, 07:44 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium JN0-682 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Elliot

8 months ago

Wait, does this mean I can't play OSPF bingo during the configuration? Darn, there goes my weekend plan.

upvoted 0 times

Sheridan

8 months ago

B) Each host-connected interface of the leaf node is included in the OSPF configuration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tequila

8 months ago

A) Each host-connected interface of the leaf node is included as passive in the OSPF configuration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerry

9 months ago

Aha! This is a classic networking exam question. The answer is clearly A and D. Passive interfaces on the hosts, active on the spines. Easy peasy!

upvoted 0 times

...

Joaquin

9 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure. This question is a bit tricky. I'll go with C and D just to be safe.

upvoted 0 times

Florinda

8 months ago

I believe those should be included as passive in the OSPF configuration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Franklyn

8 months ago

But what about the host-connected interfaces of the leaf node?

upvoted 0 times

...

Ulysses

8 months ago

I agree, including the spine-connected interfaces in OSPF configuration makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hyun

8 months ago

I think C and D are the correct options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hoa

9 months ago

I think both options A and B have their merits depending on the specific network requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Quentin

9 months ago

I think B and D are the right choices. The spine-connected interfaces need to be part of the OSPF configuration, and the host-connected interfaces should also be included.

upvoted 0 times

Emiko

7 months ago

Configuring the leaf node with OSPF requires attention to detail to ensure all necessary interfaces are included.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leigha

7 months ago

Including both types of interfaces ensures that the IP fabric with OSPF as the underlay routing protocol functions properly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Isidra

8 months ago

I agree, B and D are the correct choices. Both spine-connected and host-connected interfaces need to be included in the OSPF configuration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ivette

8 months ago

Make sure to double-check the configuration to ensure all necessary interfaces are included.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamesha

8 months ago

Including both spine-connected and host-connected interfaces in the OSPF configuration is essential for proper routing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laquanda

9 months ago

I agree, B and D are the correct choices for configuring OSPF in the IP fabric.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melissia

9 months ago

But including all interfaces can cause unnecessary traffic, so passive interfaces might be a better choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tori

9 months ago

I disagree, I believe option B is correct because all interfaces should be included in OSPF for proper routing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Josefa

9 months ago

Option A and D seem correct to me. The spine-connected interfaces should be included in OSPF, but the host-connected interfaces should be set as passive to avoid unnecessary route updates.

upvoted 0 times

Kasandra

8 months ago

Yes, and including the spine-connected interfaces in OSPF ensures proper routing in the fabric.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sage

8 months ago

That's correct. The host-connected interfaces should be passive to avoid route updates.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dana

8 months ago

D) Each spine-connected interface of the leaf node is included in the OSPF configuration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamesha

9 months ago

A) Each host-connected interface of the leaf node is included as passive in the OSPF configuration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melissia

9 months ago

I think option A is correct because passive interfaces do not participate in OSPF.

upvoted 0 times

...