New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper JN0-664 Exam - Topic 6 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-664 exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 6
[All JN0-664 Questions]

Exhibit

Referring to the exhibit, CE-1 is providing NAT services for the hosts at Site 1 and you must provide Internet access for those hosts

Which two statements are correct in this scenario? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

To provide Internet access for the hosts at Site 1, you need to configure static routes in the main routing instance on PE-1 that point to the VPN-A.inet.0 table as the next hop. This allows PE-1 to forward traffic from the Internet to CE-1 using MPLS labels and vice versa. You need to configure two static routes: one for the 10.1.2.0/24 prefix that represents the private network of Site 1, and one for the 203.0.113.1/32 prefix that represents the public IP address of CE-1.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Vicki
3 months ago
Just to clarify, does this mean we need both A and C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
3 months ago
D is a must, can't forget about prefix leaking!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamekia
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure about B? Seems off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
4 months ago
I think C makes sense too, gotta leak that default route!
upvoted 0 times
...
Wava
4 months ago
A is definitely correct, you need that static route.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabina
4 months ago
I'm leaning towards option D because it seems like leaking the 10.1.2.0/24 prefix makes sense for NAT services.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
4 months ago
I feel like I should know this, but I can't recall if we need to leak the default route or the specific prefix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lura
4 months ago
I think we practiced a question similar to this where we had to configure RIB groups. Could it be option C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
5 months ago
I remember something about static routes, but I'm not sure if it's for the 10.1.2.0/24 prefix or the 203.0.113.1/32.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evan
5 months ago
Yep, I agree with Emily. The static route in the main routing instance seems like the way to go. I'll double-check the specific prefix and next hop details, but that's the general strategy I'd use to solve this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the VPN-A.inet.0 table and how that fits into the solution. I'll need to review the networking concepts around VPNs and routing tables to make sure I'm on the right track.
upvoted 0 times
...
Milly
5 months ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. We need to provide Internet access for the hosts at Site 1, and CE-1 is providing NAT services, so we'll need to configure some routing to make that work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the requirements correctly before selecting my answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
5 months ago
Based on the information provided, I think the key is to configure a static route in the main routing instance that uses the VPN-A.inet.0 table as the next hop. That should allow the hosts at Site 1 to access the Internet through the NAT services on CE-1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
5 months ago
Okay, let's see here. I think the key is to configure the service parameters to handle the parked call timeout. I'll make sure to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerri
5 months ago
I think I've got a good handle on trace files. Server processes and background processes can both write them, and they're written to the Fast Recovery Area. I'll focus on those two options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louann
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward integration testing question. I'll focus on understanding the differences between the testing types and how they relate to the question.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel