New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Juniper JN0-664 Exam - Topic 4 Question 8 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-664 exam
Question #: 8
Topic #: 4
[All JN0-664 Questions]

Exhibit

Referring to the exhibit, CE-1 is providing NAT services for the hosts at Site 1 and you must provide Internet access for those hosts

Which two statements are correct in this scenario? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

BGP add-path is a feature that allows the advertisement of multiple paths through the same peering session for the same prefix without the new paths implicitly replacing any previous paths. This behavior promotes path diversity and reduces multi-exit discriminator (MED) oscillations. BGP add-path is implemented by adding a path identifier to each path in the NLRI. The path identifier can be considered as something similar to a route distinguisher in VPNs, except that a path ID can apply to any address family.Path IDs are unique to a peering session and are generated for each network3. In this question, we have a route reflector (RR) that receives two routes for the same prefix (192.168.0.0/16) from an EBGP neighbor. By default, the RR will only advertise its best path to its clients (R1 and R2). However, we want R1 and R2 to receive both routes from the RR. To achieve this, we need to configure BGP add-path on the RR and enable it to send multiple paths for the same prefix to its clients.


by Yvonne at Jul 09, 2023, 04:42 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium JN0-664 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Vilma
3 months ago
C sounds a bit complicated for this scenario, not sure about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Augustine
3 months ago
Totally agree with A and D, those are the right moves!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnta
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure about B? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xenia
4 months ago
I think D makes sense too, leaking the prefix is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
4 months ago
A is definitely correct, you need that static route.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
4 months ago
I vaguely recall that leaking routes can be tricky. I wonder if option D is correct since it mentions the 10.1.2.0/24 prefix, which seems relevant here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the NAT part. Does that mean we definitely need to configure something in the main routing instance?
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
5 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to configure RIB groups. It feels like option C might be the right choice for leaking routes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Asuncion
5 months ago
I remember we discussed something about static routes in class, but I'm not sure if it's for the 10.1.2.0/24 prefix or the 203.0.113.1/32.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a good test of my skills. I'll need to carefully review the files and think through the security implications. I'm up for the challenge, though!
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
5 months ago
I'm pretty sure hardware addresses are referenced at the data link layer, so I'll go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
5 months ago
Ah, I see. Moving the web application's scripts and content to a RAM disk could be a good way to reduce the need for swap space. I'll make sure to consider that as a potential solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with LDAP, so I'll need to think this through carefully. Maybe I should review my notes on LDAP authentication before attempting this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
5 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward multiple choice question on workflow rules. I'm feeling confident I can handle this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rossana
5 months ago
I've got a good feeling about this one. The correct answer should be clear if I break down the requirements step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
9 months ago
I've got a brilliant idea - let's just tell the hosts at Site 1 to use Bing instead of Google. That way, they won't need any Internet access at all! Problem solved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nidia
9 months ago
Haha, I like the way you're thinking, Dorothea! Why complicate things when a default route will do the trick? Though I suppose the exam wants us to show our routing expertise. Anyway, I'm going with A and D.
upvoted 0 times
Lizette
8 months ago
Let's go with those then, sounds good to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
8 months ago
I think A and D are the correct choices in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
8 months ago
Yeah, but showing our routing skills is important for the exam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyla
8 months ago
I agree with you, a default route is definitely the simpler option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dorothea
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not convinced. Wouldn't it be better to leak a default route from the inet.0 table to the VPN-A.inet.0 table instead? That way the hosts at Site 1 can access the Internet without having to configure a bunch of static routes.
upvoted 0 times
Fannie
9 months ago
Lettie: Definitely. It's a more efficient way to provide Internet access for those hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
9 months ago
User 2: I agree with you. That would make it easier for the hosts at Site 1 to access the Internet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
9 months ago
User 1: I think option C is correct. We should leak a default route from the inet.0 table to the VPN-A.inet.0 table.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jenise
10 months ago
Hold on, I'm not sure about that. Shouldn't we also configure a static route for the 203.0.113.1/32 prefix? That's the gateway for the Internet, right?
upvoted 0 times
Kimberlie
9 months ago
B) You must configure a static route in the main routing instance for the 203.0.113.1/32 prefix that uses the VPN-A.inet.0 table as the next hop.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorathy
10 months ago
A) You must configure a static route in the main routing instance for the 10 1 2.0/24 prefix that uses the VPN-A.inet.0 table as the next hop
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tabetha
11 months ago
I'm not sure about option C though. Do we really need to configure a RIB group on PE-1 to leak a default route?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
11 months ago
I think options A and D are correct. We need to configure a static route for the 10.1.2.0/24 prefix in the main routing instance and also leak that prefix from the VPN-A.inet.0 table to the inet.0 table.
upvoted 0 times
Lai
9 months ago
Great, so we should configure the static route and RIB group as mentioned in options A and D to ensure proper NAT services for the hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucille
10 months ago
That's correct, both options A and D mention the necessary steps for providing Internet access for the hosts at Site 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
10 months ago
Yes, and we also need to leak that prefix from the VPN-A.inet.0 table to the inet.0 table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hortencia
10 months ago
I agree, we definitely need to configure a static route for the 10.1.2.0/24 prefix.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lai
11 months ago
I agree with Clarinda. Option A seems like the right choice for providing Internet access for the hosts at Site 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clarinda
11 months ago
I think option A is correct because we need a static route for the 10.1.2.0/24 prefix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudia
11 months ago
I'm not sure about option C and D. Can someone explain why we need to configure a RIB group for leaking routes?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
11 months ago
I agree with you, Sylvia. Option B also seems correct as we need a static route for the 203.0.113.1/32 prefix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
11 months ago
I think option A is correct because we need a static route for the 10.1.2.0/24 prefix.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel