Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper JN0-664 Exam - Topic 4 Question 28 Discussion

Posted by Benedict on Jul 04, 2024 at 02:18 AM

Exhibit

You want Site 1 to access three VLANs that are located in Site 2 and Site 3 The customer-facing interface on the PE-1 router is configured for Ethernet-VLAN encapsulation.

What is the minimum number of L2VPN routing instances to be configured to accomplish this task?

Get Premium JN0-664 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
37 comments · newest first
CA
Callie 11 months ago
I agree with Cherry, 3 is the right call here!
BE
Bernardo 11 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Seems like it could be more complicated.
NA
Naomi 11 months ago
Definitely 1 instance if they’re all in the same service.
LA
Laurene 11 months ago
I think it's actually 2 instances, not 3.
CH
Cherry 12 months ago
You need at least 3 L2VPN instances for 3 VLANs.
RO
Rosalyn 12 months ago
I’m leaning towards 1 instance since it’s Ethernet-VLAN encapsulation, but I’m not confident about that.
TA
Tarra 1 year ago
I feel like we could manage with just 2 instances, but I can't recall the exact details from the study materials.
AL
Alisha 1 year ago
I remember a practice question that mentioned needing multiple instances for different VLANs, so maybe it's 3?
WH
Whitney 1 year ago
I think we might need one L2VPN instance for each VLAN, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the case.
JE
Jettie 1 year ago
I'm pretty confident I can solve this. The key is understanding how the Ethernet-VLAN encapsulation on the PE-1 router affects the L2VPN configuration. I'll need to consider the number of VLANs and sites involved to determine the minimum number of routing instances.
DE
Denise 1 year ago
Okay, let me break this down step-by-step. Site 1 needs access to 3 VLANs in Site 2 and Site 3. The PE-1 router is using Ethernet-VLAN encapsulation, so I think I need to set up L2VPN routing instances to connect the sites.
RO
Rory 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the Ethernet-VLAN encapsulation requirement. Does that mean I need to consider some kind of Layer 2 VPN solution? I'll have to review my notes on that.
NI
Nickolas 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward VLAN connectivity question. I'll need to think through the minimum number of L2VPN routing instances required to connect the VLANs across the sites.
SH
Shantell 1 year ago
I've got this! Output networks are more expensive but more reliable, so the statement is true. Easy peasy.
NA
Natalya 1 year ago
Ugh, audit criteria questions are always tricky. I'll need to draw on my knowledge of auditing principles to figure out which option is the odd one out here.
TE
Tess 1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the differences between proportion measures and the options given.
AP
Apolonia 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I know GDPR has strict rules around sensitive personal data, but I'm not sure if financial information falls into that category. I'll have to make an educated guess and go with option B.
SI
Simona 1 year ago
Okay, let's see... Three VLANs, two sites, and a PE router. Sounds like a recipe for a networking nightmare. Wait, is the answer 6? Because why not, am I right?
SU
Susy 1 year ago
↳ replying to Simona
Candida: That makes sense. So, the minimum number of L2VPN routing instances needed is 3.
CA
Candida 1 year ago
↳ replying to Simona
User 2: I believe the answer is 3, considering the number of VLANs and sites involved.
PH
Phil 1 year ago
↳ replying to Simona
User 1: No, the answer is not 6. Think about it again.
LE
Leeann 1 year ago
Ah, the joys of Layer 2 VPNs. It's like a maze of tunnels, but with more acronyms than a tech conference. The answer's gotta be 3, just to keep things interesting.
GA
Galen 1 year ago
Hmm, let me think... If I had a nickel for every time I had to configure multiple routing instances, I'd be rich enough to buy my own island. But I digress, the answer is 2, right?
CA
Carolynn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Galen
Absolutely! The answer is 2 routing instances.
RO
Rodrigo 1 year ago
↳ replying to Galen
I think it's 1.
BO
Boris 1 year ago
↳ replying to Galen
That's right! It is indeed 2 routing instances that need to be configured.
DI
Dick 1 year ago
↳ replying to Galen
No, the correct answer is 3.
LO
Loise 1 year ago
↳ replying to Galen
Yes, you are correct! The minimum number of L2VPN routing instances to be configured is 2.
BA
Barbra 1 year ago
↳ replying to Galen
Yes, the answer is 2.
FR
Freeman 2 years ago
One routing instance? That's like trying to herd cats with a single leash. This question is as confusing as a politician's tax plan.
LO
Louis 1 year ago
↳ replying to Freeman
D) 6
EL
Elliott 1 year ago
↳ replying to Freeman
C) 2
IZ
Izetta 1 year ago
↳ replying to Freeman
B) 3
SU
Sueann 1 year ago
↳ replying to Freeman
A) 1
FE
Felicia 2 years ago
But if we need to access three VLANs, wouldn't we need three L2VPN routing instances?
CO
Corrie 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C) 2.
FE
Felicia 2 years ago
I think the answer is B) 3.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel