Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Juniper JN0-664 Exam - Topic 3 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-664 exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 3
[All JN0-664 Questions]

You are configuring anycast RP for load balancing and redundancy in your PIM-SM domain. You want to share active sources between RPs.

In this scenario, what are two solutions that will accomplish this task? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Rebeca at Jun 18, 2024, 02:51 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium JN0-664 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lourdes
6 months ago
I didn't know anycast PIM could be set on RPs like that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
6 months ago
Totally agree with A, it's a must!
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
6 months ago
Wait, does MSDP really help with redundancy?
upvoted 0 times
...
Emeline
7 months ago
I think A and D could work too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royce
7 months ago
A and B are the right choices!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
7 months ago
I have a vague memory that anycast PIM is used for redundancy, but I’m confused about whether it should be configured on RPs or DRs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
7 months ago
I practiced a similar question last week, and I remember that MSDP was a key part of the solution. I think both A and B might be correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denna
7 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about the rp-set statement. I feel like we discussed it in class, but I can't recall if it was specifically for RPs or DRs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
8 months ago
I think configuring MSDP on each RP router is definitely one of the solutions. I remember it being important for sharing source information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
8 months ago
I think I know how to approach this, but I want to double-check my understanding. Isn't the rp-set statement used to define the RP set, so it should be configured on the RP routers, not the source DR routers? I'll make sure I have that right before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisbeth
8 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The two solutions are A) Configure MSDP on each RP router, and B) Configure anycast PIM with the rp-set statement on each RP router. The other options don't seem to be the right approaches for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. Configuring anycast RP seems straightforward, but I'm not sure if I fully understand the difference between the rp-set statement on the RP routers versus the source DR routers. I'll need to review that part carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
8 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question on configuring anycast RP for load balancing and redundancy in a PIM-SM domain. I think the key is to focus on the two solutions that will allow sharing of active sources between RPs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mike
8 months ago
This looks like a straightforward permissions question. I'll carefully review the information in the image and the answer choices to determine which two statements are true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreta
8 months ago
I'm torn between cost-effectiveness and cost-minimization analysis. They both sound relevant, but I'm not confident which one applies here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
8 months ago
Alright, time to put my financial analysis skills to the test. I'll work through this step-by-step and double-check my work. I'm feeling good about getting the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
1 year ago
Wait, so we're talking about 'anycast RP' and 'PIM-SM domain'? Sounds like a secret society of network engineers trying to take over the world, one multicast stream at a time.
upvoted 0 times
Veda
1 year ago
C) Configure anycast PIM with the rp-set statement on each source DR router.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
1 year ago
B) Configure anycast PIM with the rp-set statement on each RP router.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
1 year ago
A) Configure MSDP on each RP router.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Justa
1 year ago
MSDP on each source DR router? Hmm, I'm not sure that's going to accomplish the task of sharing active sources between RPs. That seems like a strange choice.
upvoted 0 times
Edward
11 months ago
D) Configure MSDP on each source DR router.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
11 months ago
C) Configure anycast PIM with the rp-set statement on each source DR router.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
11 months ago
B) Configure anycast PIM with the rp-set statement on each RP router.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabine
1 year ago
A) Configure MSDP on each RP router.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ryann
1 year ago
Configuring anycast PIP with the rp-set statement on each source DR router? That's a bit of a curveball. I wonder if that's a trick question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lea
1 year ago
Ah, the anycast PIP with the rp-set statement on each RP router. That's an interesting approach to load balancing and redundancy. I'll have to read up on that one.
upvoted 0 times
Galen
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, that sounds like a good solution for sharing active sources between RPs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anjelica
1 year ago
User 1: I think we can configure anycast PIM with the rp-set statement on each RP router.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Veronika
1 year ago
Configuring MSDP on each RP router seems like the obvious choice to share active sources. I'm familiar with MSDP, so this option is my top pick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
1 year ago
I'm not sure about option C and D. I think they might not be the right solutions for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
1 year ago
I agree with Margarett. Configuring MSDP on each RP router and anycast PIM with the rp-set statement on each RP router should work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarett
1 year ago
I think option A and B are the solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel