New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Juniper JN0-664 Exam - Topic 3 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-664 exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 3
[All JN0-664 Questions]

You are configuring anycast RP for load balancing and redundancy in your PIM-SM domain. You want to share active sources between RPs.

In this scenario, what are two solutions that will accomplish this task? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Rebeca at Jun 18, 2024, 02:51 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium JN0-664 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lourdes
3 months ago
I didn't know anycast PIM could be set on RPs like that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
3 months ago
Totally agree with A, it's a must!
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
3 months ago
Wait, does MSDP really help with redundancy?
upvoted 0 times
...
Emeline
4 months ago
I think A and D could work too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royce
4 months ago
A and B are the right choices!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
4 months ago
I have a vague memory that anycast PIM is used for redundancy, but I’m confused about whether it should be configured on RPs or DRs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question last week, and I remember that MSDP was a key part of the solution. I think both A and B might be correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denna
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about the rp-set statement. I feel like we discussed it in class, but I can't recall if it was specifically for RPs or DRs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
5 months ago
I think configuring MSDP on each RP router is definitely one of the solutions. I remember it being important for sharing source information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
5 months ago
I think I know how to approach this, but I want to double-check my understanding. Isn't the rp-set statement used to define the RP set, so it should be configured on the RP routers, not the source DR routers? I'll make sure I have that right before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisbeth
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The two solutions are A) Configure MSDP on each RP router, and B) Configure anycast PIM with the rp-set statement on each RP router. The other options don't seem to be the right approaches for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. Configuring anycast RP seems straightforward, but I'm not sure if I fully understand the difference between the rp-set statement on the RP routers versus the source DR routers. I'll need to review that part carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
5 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question on configuring anycast RP for load balancing and redundancy in a PIM-SM domain. I think the key is to focus on the two solutions that will allow sharing of active sources between RPs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mike
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward permissions question. I'll carefully review the information in the image and the answer choices to determine which two statements are true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreta
5 months ago
I'm torn between cost-effectiveness and cost-minimization analysis. They both sound relevant, but I'm not confident which one applies here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
5 months ago
Alright, time to put my financial analysis skills to the test. I'll work through this step-by-step and double-check my work. I'm feeling good about getting the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
10 months ago
Wait, so we're talking about 'anycast RP' and 'PIM-SM domain'? Sounds like a secret society of network engineers trying to take over the world, one multicast stream at a time.
upvoted 0 times
Veda
9 months ago
C) Configure anycast PIM with the rp-set statement on each source DR router.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
10 months ago
B) Configure anycast PIM with the rp-set statement on each RP router.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
10 months ago
A) Configure MSDP on each RP router.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Justa
10 months ago
MSDP on each source DR router? Hmm, I'm not sure that's going to accomplish the task of sharing active sources between RPs. That seems like a strange choice.
upvoted 0 times
Edward
8 months ago
D) Configure MSDP on each source DR router.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
8 months ago
C) Configure anycast PIM with the rp-set statement on each source DR router.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
8 months ago
B) Configure anycast PIM with the rp-set statement on each RP router.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabine
9 months ago
A) Configure MSDP on each RP router.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ryann
10 months ago
Configuring anycast PIP with the rp-set statement on each source DR router? That's a bit of a curveball. I wonder if that's a trick question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lea
10 months ago
Ah, the anycast PIP with the rp-set statement on each RP router. That's an interesting approach to load balancing and redundancy. I'll have to read up on that one.
upvoted 0 times
Galen
9 months ago
User 2: Yeah, that sounds like a good solution for sharing active sources between RPs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anjelica
10 months ago
User 1: I think we can configure anycast PIM with the rp-set statement on each RP router.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Veronika
10 months ago
Configuring MSDP on each RP router seems like the obvious choice to share active sources. I'm familiar with MSDP, so this option is my top pick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
11 months ago
I'm not sure about option C and D. I think they might not be the right solutions for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
11 months ago
I agree with Margarett. Configuring MSDP on each RP router and anycast PIM with the rp-set statement on each RP router should work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarett
11 months ago
I think option A and B are the solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel