MENU
You are configuring anycast RP for load balancing and redundancy in your PIM-SM domain. You want to share active sources between RPs.
In this scenario, what are two solutions that will accomplish this task? (Choose two.)
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium JN0-664 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
33 comments · newest first
LO
Lourdes
11 months ago
I didn't know anycast PIM could be set on RPs like that!
GL
Glory
11 months ago
Totally agree with A, it's a must!
NO
Norah
11 months ago
Wait, does MSDP really help with redundancy?
EM
Emeline
11 months ago
I think A and D could work too.
RO
Royce
12 months ago
A and B are the right choices!
AS
Ashlyn
12 months ago
I have a vague memory that anycast PIM is used for redundancy, but I’m confused about whether it should be configured on RPs or DRs.
PE
Peggie
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question last week, and I remember that MSDP was a key part of the solution. I think both A and B might be correct.
DE
Denna
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure about the rp-set statement. I feel like we discussed it in class, but I can't recall if it was specifically for RPs or DRs.
SY
Sylvia
1 year ago
I think configuring MSDP on each RP router is definitely one of the solutions. I remember it being important for sharing source information.
MO
Mollie
1 year ago
I think I know how to approach this, but I want to double-check my understanding. Isn't the rp-set statement used to define the RP set, so it should be configured on the RP routers, not the source DR routers? I'll make sure I have that right before answering.
LI
Lisbeth
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The two solutions are A) Configure MSDP on each RP router, and B) Configure anycast PIM with the rp-set statement on each RP router. The other options don't seem to be the right approaches for this scenario.
JA
Jacquelyne
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. Configuring anycast RP seems straightforward, but I'm not sure if I fully understand the difference between the rp-set statement on the RP routers versus the source DR routers. I'll need to review that part carefully.
ME
Merissa
1 year ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question on configuring anycast RP for load balancing and redundancy in a PIM-SM domain. I think the key is to focus on the two solutions that will allow sharing of active sources between RPs.
MI
Mike
1 year ago
This looks like a straightforward permissions question. I'll carefully review the information in the image and the answer choices to determine which two statements are true.
LO
Loreta
1 year ago
I'm torn between cost-effectiveness and cost-minimization analysis. They both sound relevant, but I'm not confident which one applies here.
FI
Filiberto
1 year ago
Alright, time to put my financial analysis skills to the test. I'll work through this step-by-step and double-check my work. I'm feeling good about getting the right answer.
RO
Rodrigo
1 year ago
Wait, so we're talking about 'anycast RP' and 'PIM-SM domain'? Sounds like a secret society of network engineers trying to take over the world, one multicast stream at a time.
VE
Veda
1 year ago
C) Configure anycast PIM with the rp-set statement on each source DR router.
FA
Fausto
1 year ago
B) Configure anycast PIM with the rp-set statement on each RP router.
DA
Darrin
1 year ago
A) Configure MSDP on each RP router.
JU
Justa
2 years ago
MSDP on each source DR router? Hmm, I'm not sure that's going to accomplish the task of sharing active sources between RPs. That seems like a strange choice.
ED
Edward
1 year ago
D) Configure MSDP on each source DR router.
IV
Ivette
1 year ago
C) Configure anycast PIM with the rp-set statement on each source DR router.
FL
Flo
1 year ago
B) Configure anycast PIM with the rp-set statement on each RP router.
SA
Sabine
1 year ago
A) Configure MSDP on each RP router.
RY
Ryann
2 years ago
Configuring anycast PIP with the rp-set statement on each source DR router? That's a bit of a curveball. I wonder if that's a trick question.
LE
Lea
2 years ago
Ah, the anycast PIP with the rp-set statement on each RP router. That's an interesting approach to load balancing and redundancy. I'll have to read up on that one.
GA
Galen
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, that sounds like a good solution for sharing active sources between RPs.
AN
Anjelica
1 year ago
User 1: I think we can configure anycast PIM with the rp-set statement on each RP router.
VE
Veronika
2 years ago
Configuring MSDP on each RP router seems like the obvious choice to share active sources. I'm familiar with MSDP, so this option is my top pick.
FL
Flo
2 years ago
I'm not sure about option C and D. I think they might not be the right solutions for this scenario.
AN
Anglea
2 years ago
I agree with Margarett. Configuring MSDP on each RP router and anycast PIM with the rp-set statement on each RP router should work.
MA
Margarett
2 years ago
I think option A and B are the solutions.