MENU
Refer to the exhibit.
Click the Exhibit button.
You have an OSPF environment. You have recently added a router called R4 that is directly connected to R1 and R2. You discover that R4 is only peering with R2.
Referring to the exhibit, how would you correct the peering?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium JN0-664 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
The OSPF cost is carried in the LSAs that are exchanged within an OSPF area. When a router calculates the cost to a destination it uses the cost of the exit interface of each router in the path to the destination.
36 comments · newest first
TI
Timothy
11 months ago
Definitely need to check those MTU sizes, could be a factor.
CH
Chanel
11 months ago
Lowering R1's priority won't help here, that's not the issue.
CA
Carmen
11 months ago
Surprised R4 isn't peering with R1 too, what's up with that?
AN
Anissa
11 months ago
I think adjusting the Dead Interval is the way to go!
MA
Margurite
12 months ago
R4 needs to match the Hello Interval with R1 and R2.
TR
Trina
12 months ago
Changing the MTU size seems too specific; I don't think that's the issue here. It must be related to the Hello or Dead Intervals.
AS
Ashleigh
1 year ago
I feel like the priority settings might be relevant, but I can't recall if lowering R1's priority would actually help in this scenario.
LE
Leonora
1 year ago
I think I practiced a similar question where adjusting the Dead Interval helped establish peering. Could that be the solution?
PA
Patti
1 year ago
I remember something about OSPF peering issues, but I'm not sure if adjusting the Hello Interval is the right move here.
DO
Donte
1 year ago
Alright, I've got a strategy here. I'll start by looking at the OSPF priority and MTU settings, since those can impact neighbor adjacencies. If those don't work, I'll check the OSPF timers as a potential solution.
IN
In
1 year ago
Okay, let's see here. The key seems to be getting R4 to peer with both R1 and R2. I'm thinking option C might be the way to go, but I'll double-check the OSPF timers to be sure.
PI
Pilar
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions that R4 is only peering with R2, so I'll need to figure out what's causing that and how to fix it.
EL
Elza
1 year ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward OSPF configuration issue. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the OSPF neighbor requirements.
TO
Tonette
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem a bit broad, and I'm not entirely confident in my knowledge of mobile web personalization features. I'll have to think this through carefully.
HO
Howard
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll have to think it through and try to eliminate the options that don't seem right.
MA
Maryann
1 year ago
Wow, I can't believe they're asking us to fix a peering issue in an OSPF environment. It's like they want us to be network detectives or something. I'm just gonna go with C and hope for the best!
CA
Caitlin
1 year ago
Adjusting the Hello Interval, huh? Sounds like a dance-off between the routers. Maybe we should throw in some music and get this party started!
TO
Tori
1 year ago
User 3: Tori is right. We should probably adjust the Hello Interval to fix the peering issue.
AL
Allene
1 year ago
User 2: Allene, that's funny! But we need to make sure the routers are communicating properly.
GE
German
1 year ago
User 1: Adjusting the Hello Interval, huh? Sounds like a dance-off between the routers.
ES
Estrella
1 year ago
Ah, the good old Dead Interval trick. Matching those intervals should definitely get R4 to play nice with the other routers. It's like a OSPF speed dating, you know?
JO
Johnetta
1 year ago
Britt: Exactly, it's like getting everyone to dance to the same rhythm in the OSPF world.
BR
Britt
1 year ago
User 2: Totally, it's all about making sure they're on the same page with those intervals.
KR
Kristal
1 year ago
User 1: Yeah, adjusting the Dead Interval is key to getting R4 to peer with R1 and R2.
SA
Salena
1 year ago
Whoa, changing the MTU size? That's some hardcore networking right there. I'm not sure I'd want to mess with those bytes, but hey, if it works, it works!
IV
Ivette
1 year ago
True, changing the MTU size sounds risky but it might be necessary.
LA
Lashunda
1 year ago
I think adjusting the Dead Interval might be the way to go.
ME
Meaghan
1 year ago
Yeah, networking can get pretty intense sometimes.
LA
Laurel
2 years ago
Hmm, I think adjusting the Priority on R1 to be lower than R4's would be the way to go. Gotta make sure that R4 knows who's the boss around here!
DA
Danica
1 year ago
User 4: True, keeping the intervals in sync is important for proper peering.
SA
Samira
1 year ago
User 3: Adjusting the Dead Interval on R4 to match R1 and R2 could also help.
GE
Gertude
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, that sounds like a good idea. R4 needs to know its place.
JE
Jenelle
1 year ago
User 1: I think adjusting the Priority on R1 to be lower than R4's would work.
KA
Kami
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think A) Adjust the Priority on R1 to be lower than the Priority on R4 could also be a possible solution.
RO
Royal
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) Adjust the Hello Interval on R1 and R2 to match the Hello Interval on R4.
RE
Remona
2 years ago
I think the correct answer is C) Adjust the Dead Interval on R4 to match the Dead Interval on R1 and R2.