Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper JN0-664 Exam - Topic 1 Question 60 Discussion

Posted by Merilyn on Mar 31, 2026 at 03:43 AM

Refer to the exhibit.

Click the Exhibit button.

Referring to the exhibit, you must provide VRF Internet access over a single connection for VPN-A Site 1, which connects to PE-1.

Which two statements are correct in this scenario? (Choose two.)

Suggested Answer: A, B

In the provided exhibit, the configuration involves using a RIB (Routing Information Base) group to facilitate internet access for VPN-A Site 1 through PE-1. The goal is to provide VRF Internet access over a single connection.

1. **Understanding RIB Groups**:

- RIB groups allow for the import and export of routes between different routing tables.

- In this scenario, we have two RIBs: `inet.0` (the main routing table) and `VPN-A.inet.0` (the VRF-specific routing table).

2. **Statement Analysis**:

- **A. You must use the RIB group to move a default route, which is learned through BGP, from the inet.0 table to the VPN-A.inet.0 table.**

- Correct. To provide Internet access to VPN-A, the default route (0.0.0.0/0) learned via BGP in the `inet.0` table must be made available in the `VPN-A.inet.0` table. This is done using the RIB group to import the default route.

- **B. You do not need to use the RIB group to move interface routes from the inet.0 table to the VPN-A.inet.0 table.**

- Correct. Interface routes (connected routes) are typically directly added to both the global and the VRF routing tables without needing a RIB group. These routes are known to the VRF because the interfaces are part of the VRF configuration.

- **C. You do not need to use the RIB group default route, which is learned through BGP, from the inet.0 table to the VPN-A.inet.0 table.**

- Incorrect. As discussed, the default route needs to be imported into the VRF's routing table using a RIB group to enable Internet access for the VRF.

- **D. You must use the RIB group to move interface routes from the inet.0 table to the VPN-A.inet.0 table.**

- Incorrect. Interface routes are directly associated with the VRF interfaces and are automatically known to the VRF routing table. There is no need to use a RIB group for these routes.

**Conclusion**:

The correct answers are:

**A. You must use the RIB group to move a default route, which is learned through BGP, from the inet.0 table to the VPN-A.inet.0 table.**

**B. You do not need to use the RIB group to move interface routes from the inet.0 table to the VPN-A.inet.0 table.**

**Reference**:

- Juniper Networks Documentation on RIB Groups: [RIB Groups Overview](https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/rib-groups-overview.html)

- Junos OS VPNs Configuration Guide: [Junos VPNs Configuration](https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/vpns-overview.html)


Get Premium JN0-664 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
15 comments · newest first
DA
Darrin 2 months ago
I’m leaning towards B too. It simplifies the process.
PE
Peggie 2 months ago
True, but interface routes are different. B should be the answer.
CA
Carrol 2 months ago
But A makes sense for default routes. It's about BGP.
DA
Darrin 3 months ago
I agree with Peggie. A seems too complicated for this scenario.
PE
Peggie 3 months ago
I feel B is correct. No need for RIB group for interface routes.
CA
Carrol 3 months ago
This question is tricky. I think A and D might be right.
ER
Ernie 3 months ago
Surprised that people think B) is right, I thought RIB groups were essential!
LO
Lou 3 months ago
D) is not needed, just stick with A and B.
GE
Geoffrey 4 months ago
Wait, C) seems off to me, how can you skip the RIB group for BGP routes?
JO
Jodi 5 months ago
I think B) is also right, no RIB group needed for interface routes.
FE
Felton 5 months ago
A) is definitely correct, you need that RIB group.
BR
Brittney 6 months ago
I think option B might be right too, since interface routes can sometimes be handled differently, but I need to double-check my notes.
TR
Trina 6 months ago
I believe option A is correct because default routes from BGP usually need to be moved with RIB groups, but I'm not 100% confident.
FR
France 6 months ago
This question feels familiar; I think we discussed something similar in class about moving routes between tables.
MA
Marva 7 months ago
I remember studying RIB groups, but I'm not entirely sure if they apply to default routes or just interface routes in this case.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel