Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Juniper Exam JN0-649 Topic 6 Question 47 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-649 exam
Question #: 47
Topic #: 6
[All JN0-649 Questions]

The connection between DC1 and DC2 is routed as shown in the exhibit.

In this scenario, which statement is correct?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Beatriz at Oct 20, 2024, 01:38 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium JN0-649 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Doretha
2 months ago
If only the exhibit had a whiteboard in the background, this would be the ultimate network nerd question.
upvoted 0 times
Karrie
23 days ago
C) An IP prefix route provides encoding for intra-subnet forwarding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bea
29 days ago
B) L3VPN must be enabled to advertise reachability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myrtie
1 months ago
A) The border devices must be able to perform Layer 3 routing and provide IRB functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Roxane
2 months ago
I bet the exam writer had a field day coming up with these options. Probably chuckled the whole time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hillary
2 months ago
Type 2 and Type 5 routes, huh? Time to get my OSPF game on point.
upvoted 0 times
Jodi
23 days ago
Definitely. Without that, the connection between DC1 and DC2 wouldn't work properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlene
27 days ago
I agree. It's important for them to be able to route at Layer 3 and have Integrated Routing and Bridging (IRB) functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tina
1 months ago
Yeah, that makes sense. We need the devices to handle the routing between the data centers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
2 months ago
I think the correct statement is A) The border devices must be able to perform Layer 3 routing and provide IRB functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dana
2 months ago
An IP prefix route? That's the way to handle intra-subnet forwarding. Nice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
2 months ago
L3VPN is the way to go here. Gotta get that reachability advertised properly.
upvoted 0 times
Royal
22 days ago
User 3: An IP prefix route provides encoding for intra-subnet forwarding as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederick
29 days ago
User 2: Definitely, that's the best way to ensure proper routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
1 months ago
User 1: L3VPN must be enabled to advertise reachability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margret
3 months ago
The border devices must definitely have Layer 3 routing capabilities to handle this scenario. IRB seems essential too.
upvoted 0 times
Nada
1 months ago
That makes sense. It's important for efficient forwarding within the subnet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
1 months ago
C) An IP prefix route provides encoding for intra-subnet forwarding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
1 months ago
Yes, I agree. Having Layer 3 routing capabilities is crucial in this setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toshia
2 months ago
A) The border devices must be able to perform Layer 3 routing and provide IRB functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
2 months ago
User 2: Agreed, without those capabilities, the connection between DC1 and DC2 wouldn't work properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylou
3 months ago
User 1: I think option A is correct. The border devices need Layer 3 routing and IRB functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elbert
3 months ago
Hmm, I see your point. But I still think A makes more sense because of the routing requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samuel
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct statement is B) L3VPN must be enabled to advertise reachability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
4 months ago
I think the correct statement is A) The border devices must be able to perform Layer 3 routing and provide IRB functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel