Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper Exam JN0-649 Topic 3 Question 54 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-649 exam
Question #: 54
Topic #: 3
[All JN0-649 Questions]

A BGP network has been designed to provide resiliency and redundancy to a multihomed customer network.

Which two statements are correct in this scenario? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lorean
2 months ago
Haha, I bet someone chose A just to mess with the instructor. That's a classic move!
upvoted 0 times
Verda
10 days ago
Agreed, both next hops need to be utilized for resiliency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francine
16 days ago
Definitely, a routing policy is necessary for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Velda
17 days ago
I think B is the correct choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlota
1 months ago
Silly move, but it might work!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Felix
2 months ago
Nah, I disagree. C is also correct. The TTL value of 1 is used to limit the EBGP session scope.
upvoted 0 times
Dottie
17 days ago
User 2: B) A routing policy will be required to forward traffic to both next hops.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
26 days ago
User 1: A) Both the next hops will be used to forward traffic to R2.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Truman
2 months ago
I see your point, Pilar. Having a routing policy is important for proper traffic management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
2 months ago
I think the correct answers are B and D. A policy is required to use both next hops, and the TTL setting is needed for loopback peering.
upvoted 0 times
Barrett
12 days ago
Definitely, having multiple next hops and proper TTL settings are key for network reliability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
17 days ago
It's important to have redundancy in a multihomed network for resiliency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
21 days ago
Yes, that's correct. The ttl statement must be configured for peering to a loopback address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
28 days ago
I agree, a routing policy is needed to forward traffic to both next hops.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
29 days ago
Yes, and the ttl statement must be configured for peering to a loopback address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doyle
1 months ago
I agree, a routing policy is needed to forward traffic to both next hops.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
1 months ago
That makes sense, using both next hops and setting the TTL value are important for resiliency and redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
1 months ago
Yes, the ttl statement must be configured for peering to a loopback address of a directly connected peer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Afton
1 months ago
I agree, a routing policy is needed to forward traffic to both next hops.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pilar
2 months ago
But we also need a routing policy to ensure traffic is forwarded correctly, so option B is also correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
2 months ago
I agree with Kami, having multiple next hops increases resiliency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kami
3 months ago
I think option A is correct because both next hops will be used for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
a