Juniper Exam JN0-649 Topic 3 Question 21 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-649 exam

Question #: 21
Topic #: 3

[All JN0-649 Questions]

You are asked to implement fault tolerant RPs in your multicast network.

Which two solutions would accomplish this behavior? (Choose two.)

AUse BFD with statically defined RPs.

BUse MSDP with statically defined RPs.

CUse anycast PIM with statically defined RPs.

DUse IGMPv3 with statically defined RPs.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Joni at Oct 22, 2023, 08:26 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium JN0-649 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Fredric

2 months ago

I'm going to go with B and C. Statically defined RPs are key, and MSDP plus anycast PIM seem like the way to go for fault tolerance.

upvoted 0 times

Natalie

26 days ago

Anycast PIM with statically defined RPs is definitely a strong choice for fault tolerance in multicast networks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Boris

1 months ago

I think using BFD with statically defined RPs could also be a good option for fault tolerance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reyes

1 months ago

I agree, using MSDP and anycast PIM with statically defined RPs is a solid choice for fault tolerance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Percy

3 months ago

Wow, this question is really testing our multicast knowledge! I'm glad I brushed up on my RP redundancy strategies.

upvoted 0 times

Maryln

2 months ago

Yes, it's important to have a good understanding of RP redundancy strategies for fault tolerance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Louis

2 months ago

C) Use anycast PIM with statically defined RPs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Val

2 months ago

A) Use BFD with statically defined RPs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Clarence

3 months ago

A could work, but BFD is usually used for unicast routing, not multicast. I'd go with B and C.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bobbye

3 months ago

D is definitely wrong. IGMPv3 is for host-to-router communication, not for RP redundancy.

upvoted 0 times

Asuncion

2 months ago

I agree, D is not the correct option for fault tolerant RPs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nieves

2 months ago

C) Use anycast PIM with statically defined RPs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aileen

2 months ago

A) Use BFD with statically defined RPs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bettye

3 months ago

I believe using anycast PIM with statically defined RPs could also be a viable solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Candra

3 months ago

I agree with Floyd. MSDP can help in achieving fault tolerance in multicast networks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maryann

3 months ago

I think B and C are the correct answers. Using MSDP and anycast PIM with statically defined RPs can provide fault tolerance for the multicast network.

upvoted 0 times

Rene

2 months ago

Anycast PIM with statically defined RPs sounds like a reliable solution for fault tolerance in the multicast network.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kenda

2 months ago

I'm not sure about IGMPv3 with statically defined RPs, but I think using MSDP and anycast PIM is a solid choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pamella

2 months ago

I think BFD with statically defined RPs could also be a good option for fault tolerance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Phuong

3 months ago

I agree, using MSDP and anycast PIM with statically defined RPs is a good solution for fault tolerance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Floyd

3 months ago

I think using MSDP with statically defined RPs would be a good solution.

upvoted 0 times

...