Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper Exam JN0-649 Topic 10 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-649 exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 10
[All JN0-649 Questions]

Referring to the exhibit, traffic ingresses on interface ge-0/0/3 and egresses on interface ge-0/0/4.

Which queue does traffic with the IP precedence value of 100 use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Tiera
2 months ago
A precedence of 100? That's like, over 9000! I'm going with the nuclear option, network-control. No traffic jam is getting through that queue.
upvoted 0 times
Buck
1 months ago
I agree with you, network-control seems like the best choice for traffic with such a high precedence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards assured-forwarding, it sounds like a reliable option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerri
2 months ago
I think you might be right, network-control seems like the safest bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annette
3 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. The traffic is ingressing on ge-0/0/3 and egressing on ge-0/0/4. Based on the QoS configuration, I'd say it's using the assured-forwarding queue. Boom, nailed it!
upvoted 0 times
Anjelica
1 months ago
Nice job figuring that out based on the ingress and egress interfaces!
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
1 months ago
Yeah, that queue is designed for traffic that requires a certain level of assurance in delivery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
1 months ago
Exactly, it ensures that important traffic like that gets the priority it needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
2 months ago
So, traffic with IP precedence value of 100 gets special treatment in the assured-forwarding queue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verlene
2 months ago
I think you're right, the assured-forwarding queue makes sense for traffic with an IP precedence value of 100.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarina
2 months ago
Yeah, that queue is designed for traffic that needs a certain level of assurance in delivery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alica
3 months ago
I think you're right, the assured-forwarding queue makes sense for traffic with IP precedence value of 100.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kiera
3 months ago
This is easy, the precedence value of 100 means it's gotta be the highest priority queue - expedited-forwarding all the way, baby!
upvoted 0 times
...
Orville
3 months ago
Hmm, the images seem to show some kind of QoS configuration, but I'm not seeing a queue with a precedence value of 100. Let me double-check the options... Ah, best-effort it is!
upvoted 0 times
Dexter
2 months ago
User 2: Yeah, you're right. It's the best-effort queue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanda
2 months ago
User 1: I think the traffic with IP precedence value of 100 uses the best-effort queue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kenneth
3 months ago
That makes sense, I see your point. It could be assured-forwarding after all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe it will use assured-forwarding queue because it requires a higher priority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
3 months ago
Wait, IP precedence value of 100? That's like, way past expedited-forwarding. I'm going with option A, network-control - gotta keep those network packets moving, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Josephine
2 months ago
Definitely, network-control is the way to go for handling traffic with IP precedence value of 100.
upvoted 0 times
...
Grover
2 months ago
That's a good point. Network-control seems like the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
2 months ago
Yeah, I agree. Let's go with network-control for IP precedence value of 100.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronna
2 months ago
I think option A, network-control, makes sense. We need to prioritize network traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kenneth
3 months ago
I think traffic with IP precedence value of 100 will use expedited-forwarding queue.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel