Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper Exam JN0-649 Topic 1 Question 59 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-649 exam
Question #: 59
Topic #: 1
[All JN0-649 Questions]

You are asked to establish interface level authentication for users connecting to your network. You must ensure that only corporate devices, identified by MAC addresses, are allowed to connect and authenticate. Authentication must be handled by a centralized server to increase scalability.

Which authentication method would satisfy this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/user-access/topics/topic-map/mac-radius-authentication-switching-devices.html

You can configure MAC RADIUS authentication on an interface that also allows 802.1X authentication, or you can configure either authentication method alone.

If both MAC RADIUS and 802.1X authentication are enabled on the interface, the switch first sends the host three EAPoL requests to the host. If there is no response from the host, the switch sends the host's MAC address to the RADIUS server to check whether it is a permitted MAC address. If the MAC address is configured as permitted on the RADIUS server, the RADIUS server sends a message to the switch that the MAC address is a permitted address, and the switch opens LAN access to the nonresponsive host on the interface to which it is connected.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Elfrieda
3 days ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think MAC RADIUS might be too simplistic for this requirement. We need something more robust.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shalon
9 days ago
I remember studying about 802.1X and how it can work with RADIUS for centralized authentication. It seems like a good fit here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
14 days ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The key requirement here is that we need to use a centralized server to handle the authentication, and we need to verify the MAC addresses of the devices. So 802.1X with single-secure supplicant mode seems like the best choice to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
20 days ago
Captive portal seems like it could work, but I'm not sure if that would give us the level of control and scalability that the question is looking for. I'm leaning more towards the RADIUS option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
25 days ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions interface-level authentication, so I'm wondering if 802.1X might be a better fit since it operates at the port level. I'll have to think this through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
1 months ago
I think the key here is that we need a centralized authentication method that can verify the MAC addresses of the connecting devices. That points me towards option A, MAC RADIUS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
2 months ago
I bet the person who wrote this question just learned about 802.1X yesterday. C) is the obvious pick.
upvoted 0 times
Stevie
1 months ago
Can't believe they tried to confuse us with A)!
upvoted 0 times
...
Twila
1 months ago
I agree, C) seems like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
1 months ago
Totally, 802.1X handles authentication well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
1 months ago
For sure! Centralized control is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephania
2 months ago
Wow, this question is so easy, a caveman could answer it. C) all the way, folks!
upvoted 0 times
Felicitas
1 months ago
User 4: Good to know, thanks for the clarification!
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
2 months ago
User 3: Agreed, using 802.1X with single-secure supplicant mode ensures only corporate devices can connect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
2 months ago
User 2: That's correct, it's the best option for interface level authentication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonard
2 months ago
User 1: C) 802.1X with single-secure supplicant mode
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marlon
3 months ago
That's true, but 802.1X with single-secure supplicant mode provides a more secure and scalable solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
3 months ago
B) captive portal? What is this, the 90s? C) is the modern solution for this problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonardo
3 months ago
A) MAC RADIUS? Really? That's like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. C) is the smart choice.
upvoted 0 times
Dannie
1 months ago
C) 802.1X with single-secure supplicant mode is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
1 months ago
B) I agree, C) is the smart choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Polly
3 months ago
A) MAC RADIUS? Really? That's like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shaquana
3 months ago
But wouldn't MAC RADIUS also work for this scenario? It authenticates based on MAC addresses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharita
4 months ago
D) 802.1X with multiple supplicant mode? Nah, that's overkill for this scenario. C) is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
Lourdes
3 months ago
B) Captive portal is not the right option. C) 802.1X with single-secure supplicant mode is the most suitable for this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
3 months ago
A) MAC RADIUS would not be sufficient for this scenario. C) 802.1X with single-secure supplicant mode is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Helga
4 months ago
I agree with Marlon. Using 802.1X with single-secure supplicant mode would ensure that only corporate devices are allowed to connect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marlon
4 months ago
I think the answer is C) 802.1X with single-secure supplicant mode.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
4 months ago
C) 802.1X with single-secure supplicant mode seems like the way to go. Centralized authentication and MAC address control? Sign me up!
upvoted 0 times
Javier
4 months ago
C) 802.1X with single-secure supplicant mode is definitely the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
4 months ago
B) Captive portal won't be able to handle MAC address control for corporate devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brice
4 months ago
A) MAC RADIUS wouldn't provide centralized authentication like 802.1X with single-secure supplicant mode.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel