Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper JN0-637 Exam - Topic 1 Question 25 Discussion

Posted by Kimi on Apr 06, 2026 at 12:13 AM

An ADVPN configuration has been verified on both the hub and spoke devices and it seems fine. However, OSPF is not functioning as expected.

Referring to the exhibit, which two statements under interface st0.0 on both the hub and spoke devices would solve this problem? (Choose two.)

Suggested Answer: A, B

For ADVPN with OSPF, using a point-to-multipoint (p2mp) interface type and enabling dynamic-neighbors are crucial. This configuration allows dynamic discovery of neighbors and the establishment of tunnels. For more information, refer to Juniper ADVPN Configuration Guide.

In the ADVPN configuration, OSPF isn't functioning as expected due to the interface configuration on st0.0. Here are the adjustments needed:

Interface Type p2mp (Answer A): OSPF requires that the tunnel interface be set to p2mp (point-to-multipoint) to allow OSPF to communicate with multiple dynamic neighbors over the ADVPN tunnels.

Command Example:

bash

set interfaces st0.0 family inet ospf interface-type p2mp

Dynamic Neighbors (Answer B): The dynamic neighbors statement allows OSPF to discover and communicate with dynamically established spokes in an ADVPN environment. This is essential for ADVPN to function properly since the tunnel endpoints are not static.

Command Example:

bash

set protocols ospf area 0.0.0.0 interface st0.0 dynamic-neighbors

These settings ensure OSPF properly functions over dynamically created ADVPN tunnels.


Get Premium JN0-637 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
EL
Elke 3 months ago
C could be a trap. Passive interfaces won't send OSPF updates.
TO
Tomoko 3 months ago
I agree, but I also feel B is important. Dynamic neighbors can help.
CA
Cathern 3 months ago
I think option A is crucial. P2MP is needed for OSPF.
DA
Daniel 3 months ago
I thought OSPF needed active interfaces, so C doesn't make sense.
TA
Taryn 3 months ago
Wait, are we really considering D) interface-type p2p? Seems off.
FR
Francesco 4 months ago
Not sure about that, C) passive might be the issue here.
JA
Jaime 5 months ago
I think B) dynamic-neighbors is the way to go too!
CL
Clay 5 months ago
A) interface-type p2mp is definitely needed.
JU
Jules 6 months ago
I have a hunch that "passive" might not be the right choice since we want OSPF to actively form adjacencies.
AN
An 6 months ago
I practiced a similar question where "interface-type p2p" was important for point-to-point links. Maybe that's relevant here too?
GL
Glenn 6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like "dynamic-neighbors" could help with OSPF neighbor discovery in this setup.
KA
Kasandra 7 months ago
I remember that OSPF needs to recognize the interfaces correctly, so I think "interface-type p2mp" might be one of the answers.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel