MENU
You have accessed your deployed blueprint and see the banner shown in the exhibit.
Which two statements are correct in this scenario? (Choose two.)
In Apstra 5.1, the top-level blueprint banner uses tab indicators (colored badges) to summarize blueprint status across areas such as Staged, Uncommitted, Active, and Analytics. The presence of an Uncommitted indicator signifies that there are staged modifications that have not yet been committed and therefore are not part of the active, deployed intent. That directly corresponds to the statement that changes exist which are not active on the fabric.
At the same time, the banner shows an Active indicator in an alarm state, which reflects that the running fabric has issues requiring attention---commonly surfaced as anomalies (for example, configuration deviation, interface/link faults, protocol/session issues, or service-impacting conditions). In Apstra's operational model, these issues appear as anomalies that operators should investigate and remediate to restore compliance and health. Therefore, the statement that there are anomalies that must be addressed is also correct.
The remaining options are not implied by this banner alone. Device profile assignment and resource assignment are build-time tasks, but their absence is not what the Uncommitted/Active alert indicators are specifically communicating here. The banner is highlighting uncommitted intent changes and active anomalies that affect the deployed blueprint state and assurance posture.
Verified Juniper sources (URLs):
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/apstra5.1/apstra-user-guide/topics/concept/uncommitted.html
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/apstra5.0/apstra-user-guide/topics/topic-map/anomalies-service-active.html
https://cloudlabs.apstra.com/labguide/Cloudlabs/6.0.0/test-drive-guide/lab1-junos-5_blueprints_.html