Juniper JN0-363 Exam - Topic 5 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-363 exam

Question #: 39
Topic #: 5

[All JN0-363 Questions]

Which two statements are correct about segment routing? (Choose two.)

ASegment routing adjacencies require very little resources to maintain.

BLabel assignments can be advertised through OSPF updates.

CThere are no segment routing adjacencies to maintain.

DLabel assignments can be advertised through LDP updates.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B, D

static route with a next-hop of next-table pointing to the appropriate routing table which contains more accurate information rib-groups to mirror routing information from one route-table to another. However, in many cases, in order to make this work, interface-routes also need to be mirrored. RIB Group policy can be used to constrain the routing information instance-import and instance-export statements configured within the individual routing-instances to leak routes from one table to another. Again, policy can be used here to constrain the routing information. This method is more straightforward than the rib-group method A final approach is to use physical interfaces or logical-tunnels to stitch routing-instances and use a routing protocol or static routes across this connection between the two routing-instances.

by Felicidad at Aug 02, 2024, 01:50 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium JN0-363 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Roxanne

3 months ago

Disagree with C, I thought there were some adjacencies to manage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Audra

3 months ago

Definitely A and C! Super efficient!

upvoted 0 times

...

Elza

3 months ago

Wait, no segment routing adjacencies? That sounds too good to be true!

upvoted 0 times

...

Jesus

4 months ago

I think B is right too, but not sure about A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leatha

4 months ago

A and C are correct!

upvoted 0 times

...

Niesha

4 months ago

I'm confused about D; I thought LDP was more for MPLS and not really tied to segment routing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laticia

4 months ago

I feel like I practiced a question similar to this, and it mentioned that segment routing is resource-efficient, which might relate to A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Refugia

4 months ago

I think I saw something about OSPF and label assignments in my notes, so B could be a good choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorian

5 months ago

I remember segment routing doesn't really use traditional adjacencies, so maybe C is correct? But I'm not entirely sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jules

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the label advertisement part. Is it OSPF or LDP that's used for that? I'll need to double-check the details on how segment routing integrates with other protocols.

upvoted 0 times

...

Audrie

5 months ago

I'm pretty confident about segment routing. The key is that it doesn't require maintaining adjacencies like other protocols, which saves resources. I think options A and C are the correct answers here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stacey

5 months ago

Okay, let me think this through. I know segment routing uses labels instead of traditional routing tables, so the label assignment and advertisement process is important. I'll need to review that part carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefania

5 months ago

This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key differences between segment routing and other routing protocols like OSPF and LDP.

upvoted 0 times

...

Terina

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. The question is asking about the implementation of BFD for IS-IS, which I'm not super familiar with. I'll need to think through the details carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Trevor

10 months ago

Ah, the age-old segment routing question. I'd say B and C are the winners - no adjacencies and OSPF for the labels. Easy peasy!

upvoted 0 times

Layla

8 months ago

Got it, B and D it is. Label assignments can be advertised through OSPF and LDP updates.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paris

8 months ago

I think B and C are the right choices. No adjacencies to worry about and OSPF can handle the label assignments.

upvoted 0 times

...

Berry

8 months ago

I see, so B and D are the correct choices. Label assignments can indeed be advertised through OSPF and LDP updates.

upvoted 0 times

...

Judy

9 months ago

Actually, it's B and D. Label assignments can be advertised through OSPF and LDP updates.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamra

9 months ago

I think B and D are the correct statements. Label assignments can be advertised through OSPF and LDP updates.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sabra

9 months ago

Definitely, B and C make sense. No need for segment routing adjacencies and OSPF can handle the label assignments.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ricki

10 months ago

I agree, B and C are the correct statements. No adjacencies to maintain and OSPF for the labels.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carrol

10 months ago

Haha, I can't believe they're asking about segment routing! It's like a whole new world of networking jargon. But I think B and C are the way to go here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elli

10 months ago

I'm pretty sure the correct answers are B and C. Segment routing is all about simplifying routing by reducing the need for adjacencies and using OSPF to distribute the labels.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gary

10 months ago

I'm not sure about A and C, but I think B and D make sense based on the options given.

upvoted 0 times

...

German

11 months ago

B and C seem like the correct answers to me. Segment routing doesn't require maintaining adjacencies, and the labels are advertised through OSPF, not LDP.

upvoted 0 times