Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper Exam JN0-363 Topic 5 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-363 exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 5
[All JN0-363 Questions]

Which two statements are correct about segment routing? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

static route with a next-hop of next-table pointing to the appropriate routing table which contains more accurate information rib-groups to mirror routing information from one route-table to another. However, in many cases, in order to make this work, interface-routes also need to be mirrored. RIB Group policy can be used to constrain the routing information instance-import and instance-export statements configured within the individual routing-instances to leak routes from one table to another. Again, policy can be used here to constrain the routing information. This method is more straightforward than the rib-group method A final approach is to use physical interfaces or logical-tunnels to stitch routing-instances and use a routing protocol or static routes across this connection between the two routing-instances.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Trevor
1 months ago
Ah, the age-old segment routing question. I'd say B and C are the winners - no adjacencies and OSPF for the labels. Easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
Sabra
14 hours ago
Definitely, B and C make sense. No need for segment routing adjacencies and OSPF can handle the label assignments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricki
27 days ago
I agree, B and C are the correct statements. No adjacencies to maintain and OSPF for the labels.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carrol
1 months ago
Haha, I can't believe they're asking about segment routing! It's like a whole new world of networking jargon. But I think B and C are the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
1 months ago
I'm pretty sure the correct answers are B and C. Segment routing is all about simplifying routing by reducing the need for adjacencies and using OSPF to distribute the labels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
2 months ago
I'm not sure about A and C, but I think B and D make sense based on the options given.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
2 months ago
B and C seem like the correct answers to me. Segment routing doesn't require maintaining adjacencies, and the labels are advertised through OSPF, not LDP.
upvoted 0 times
Gracia
24 days ago
Definitely, it's a great solution for optimizing network traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
28 days ago
That makes sense, segment routing is all about simplicity and efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
30 days ago
I agree, C is also correct because there are no segment routing adjacencies to maintain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
1 months ago
I think B is correct because label assignments can be advertised through OSPF updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Herman
2 months ago
I agree with Joanna. I also think D is correct because label assignments can be advertised through LDP updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
2 months ago
I think B is correct because label assignments can be advertised through OSPF updates.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel