Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Juniper JN0-363 Exam - Topic 4 Question 65 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-363 exam
Question #: 65
Topic #: 4
[All JN0-363 Questions]

Which two statements are correct about IS-IS interface metrics? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

metric---Metric value. Range: 1 through 63, or 1 through 16,777,215 (if you have configured wide metrics) Default: 10 (for all interfaces except lo0), 0 (for the lo0 interface)


by Steffanie at Jan 05, 2026, 05:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium JN0-363 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
German
I’m leaning towards A and D. D sounds familiar from my studies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wava
5 days ago
I agree, B is definitely right. A seems plausible too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
10 days ago
I think B and A are correct. Wide metrics really expand the range.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
15 days ago
B is right, but A is a bit misleading.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
20 days ago
Wait, 16 million? That seems way too high!
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
26 days ago
Totally agree, wide metrics are a game changer!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
1 month ago
I thought the default was 63, not 1023.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
1 month ago
A and B are correct!
upvoted 0 times
...
Irma
2 months ago
Haha, who even uses IS-IS these days? I'll just stick to EIGRP, it's way easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
2 months ago
D is definitely wrong, that's way too low. Gotta be B and one of the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
2 months ago
I always get confused between IS-IS and OSPF metrics. Time to brush up on my routing protocols!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
2 months ago
B and D are correct. Wide metrics are the way to go for those high-bandwidth links!
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrie
3 months ago
I recall that wide metrics are definitely important for scalability, so I think option B is correct about the 16 million limit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
3 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the default values; I thought it was 1023, but now I’m not so sure after seeing option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ramonita
3 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I believe wide metrics do allow for a higher maximum value, like around 16 million.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristian
3 months ago
I think I remember that the default metric value for IS-IS interfaces is actually 63, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jani
3 months ago
Wait, I'm a little confused now. I thought the default was 1023 and the wide metrics went up to 16 million. Let me re-read the question and options carefully before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
3 months ago
Piece of cake! I know the default IS-IS interface metric is 63, not 1023. And the wide metrics give you a max of 1023, not 16 million. This should be an easy one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerri
4 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is remembering that the default IS-IS interface metric has a max of 1023, while the wide metrics expand that to around 16 million. I'll focus on those two options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deonna
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the details of IS-IS interface metrics. I'll need to review my notes carefully to make sure I understand the differences between the default and wide metric values.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel