Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper Exam JN0-363 Topic 4 Question 57 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-363 exam
Question #: 57
Topic #: 4
[All JN0-363 Questions]

You want to share routes between two routing instances that you have configured?

What are two ways to accomplish this task? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

static route with a next-hop of next-table pointing to the appropriate routing table which contains more accurate information rib-groups to mirror routing information from one route-table to another. However, in many cases, in order to make this work, interface-routes also need to be mirrored. RIB Group policy can be used to constrain the routing information instance-import and instance-export statements configured within the individual routing-instances to leak routes from one table to another. Again, policy can be used here to constrain the routing information. This method is more straightforward than the rib-group method A final approach is to use physical interfaces or logical-tunnels to stitch routing-instances and use a routing protocol or static routes across this connection between the two routing-instances.

To share routes between two routing instances on a Junos device, you can configure an instance import policy in one or both instances to import routes from the other instance. Alternatively, a RIB (Routing Information Base) group can be used to share routes between instances. Reference::

Routing Instances Overview, Juniper Networks Documentation

RIB Groups Configuration Guide, Juniper Networks Documentation


Contribute your Thoughts:

Jacqueline
20 days ago
I'm not sure about that. I think it's A and C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
27 days ago
Aha! I know this one. B and D are the correct answers. Configuring an instance import policy and using a RIB group are the way to go. Now, if only I could remember what a RIB group actually is...
upvoted 0 times
...
Anika
28 days ago
I agree with Leota. Configuring an instance import policy and using a RIB group should work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chu
28 days ago
I'm going with B and D too. Although, I have to admit, a non-forwarding instance sounds like something you'd use to avoid paying your internet bill. Just a little routing humor there!
upvoted 0 times
Suzi
9 days ago
Haha, that's a good one! Non-forwarding instance does sound like a sneaky way to avoid bills.
upvoted 0 times
...
Armando
17 days ago
I'm going with B and D too.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leota
1 months ago
I think the answer is B and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
1 months ago
B and D sound right to me. Using a non-forwarding instance doesn't make much sense, and I'm pretty sure a forwarding instance is for something else. Time to brush up on my routing instance knowledge!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Wouldn't a forwarding instance be a better option? Maybe I'm just confused, but I feel like that's the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Lizette
14 days ago
D) Use a RIB group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
17 days ago
C) Create a forwarding instance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
25 days ago
B) Configure an instance import policy
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
27 days ago
A) Use a non-forwarding instance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nieves
1 months ago
I think the correct answers are B and D. Configuring an instance import policy and using a RIB group are the two ways to share routes between routing instances.
upvoted 0 times
Charlette
14 days ago
That's correct. Those are the two methods to accomplish the task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
20 days ago
Yes, configuring an instance import policy and using a RIB group are the ways to share routes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
1 months ago
I believe the correct answers are B and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel