Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Juniper JN0-351 Exam - Topic 1 Question 32 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-351 exam
Question #: 32
Topic #: 1
[All JN0-351 Questions]

You want to use filter-based forwarding (FBF) on your Internet peering router to load-balance traffic to two directly connected ISPs based on the source address.

Which two statements are correct in this scenario? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

Redundant Trunk Groups (RTGs) on EX Series switches provide a simple solution for network recovery when a trunk port on a switch goes down1.They are configured on the access switch and contain two links: a primary or active link, and a secondary link1.Therefore, option B is correct because if the active link fails, the secondary link automatically starts forwarding data traffic without waiting for normal spanning-tree protocol convergence1.

Option D is also correct.In a typical enterprise network composed of distribution and access layers, RTGs are used where one Access switch is connected to two different uplink switches2.This implies that RTGs must be connected to the same aggregation switch2.


by Jackie at Sep 15, 2024, 08:08 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium JN0-351 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Mitsue
6 months ago
C is correct, but D seems off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawana
6 months ago
I thought FBF was all about no-forwarding instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
6 months ago
Wait, are RIB groups really used for hiding routes?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
7 months ago
Totally agree, that's how it works!
upvoted 0 times
...
Osvaldo
7 months ago
FBF uses the forwarding routing instance type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
7 months ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought RIB groups were more about managing routes rather than just copying or hiding them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacresha
7 months ago
I practiced a similar question where FBF was mentioned, and I feel like it was related to forwarding instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
7 months ago
I remember something about RIB groups, but I can't recall if they copy or hide routes in the inet.0 table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
8 months ago
I think FBF definitely uses the forwarding routing instance type, but I'm not sure about the other option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
8 months ago
The key here is understanding how FBF works to load-balance traffic. I'm pretty confident I can identify the two correct statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ranee
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the difference between the routing instance types. Let me review that part again before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
8 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. FBF uses the forwarding routing instance type, not the no-forwarding type. And RIB groups are used to copy routes, not hide them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
8 months ago
This looks like a tricky networking question. I'll need to think through the details of filter-based forwarding and routing instances to figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryll
8 months ago
Based on my understanding, the successful RRC connection establishment should trigger the RRC connection setup procedure. I'm fairly confident that option A is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
1 year ago
Wait, are we supposed to be load-balancing traffic based on the source address? That's a bold move, my friend. Let's hope the answer choices have something to do with that.
upvoted 0 times
Wai
11 months ago
I think we need to choose the correct statements for filter-based forwarding to load-balance traffic based on the source address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
12 months ago
C) RIB groups are used to copy routes from the inet. o routing table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andra
1 year ago
A) FBF uses the no-forwarding routing instance type.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Valentine
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure FBF uses the forwarding routing instance type, not the no-forwarding one. As for the RIB groups, I'm going to have to give that some more thought.
upvoted 0 times
Jaime
12 months ago
Leatha: I'm not sure about that, we might need to look into it further.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, that sounds right. What about the RIB groups?
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
1 year ago
User 1: I think FBF uses the forwarding routing instance type.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lachelle
1 year ago
RIB groups for copying routes from the inet.0 table? That sounds about right. Let's see if I can figure out the other correct statement.
upvoted 0 times
Justine
12 months ago
C) RIB groups are used to copy routes from the inet.0 routing table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
12 months ago
A) FBF uses the no-forwarding routing instance type.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joye
1 year ago
Hmm, this question seems a bit tricky. I'm not sure if FBF uses the no-forwarding or forwarding routing instance type, but I'll have to think about that one.
upvoted 0 times
Brandon
1 year ago
RIB groups are used to copy routes from the inet.0 routing table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
1 year ago
I think FBF uses the forwarding routing instance type.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sean
1 year ago
I see your point, but I'm pretty sure it's B and C because FBF uses the forwarding routing instance type and RIB groups are used to copy routes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabel
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe it's A and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sean
1 year ago
I think the correct statements are B and C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel