Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Juniper Exam JN0-231 Topic 3 Question 58 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-231 exam
Question #: 58
Topic #: 3
[All JN0-231 Questions]

Click the Exhibit button.

You are asked to allow only ping and SSH access to the security policies shown in the exhibit.

Which statement will accomplish this task?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Laurel at Mar 23, 2025, 01:02 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium JN0-231 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Dominga
1 months ago
Wait, we're not allowed to use the 'any' application? What is this, amateur hour?
upvoted 0 times
Buffy
3 days ago
User 3: Let's go with option C then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audrie
9 days ago
User 2: Yeah, that should limit access to only ping and SSH.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anabel
16 days ago
User 1: I think we need to replace 'any' with specific applications in policy Rule-1.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Renay
1 months ago
Ah, the old 'rename the policy' trick. Classic misdirection, but I'm not falling for it. C is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
Denny
2 days ago
I agree, C is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Luisa
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm tempted by B, but it might be overkill. Why complicate things when C does the job nicely?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
2 months ago
But C makes more sense because it specifies the applications for ping and SSH.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iesha
2 months ago
I'm not sure about renaming the policies - that might cause more confusion than it's worth. C looks like the cleanest solution to me.
upvoted 0 times
Dulce
2 days ago
I think replacing application any with [junos-ping junos-ssh] is a more straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
3 days ago
But wouldn't inserting policy Rule-2 before Rule-1 also work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
7 days ago
I agree, renaming policies could be confusing. C seems like the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
8 days ago
Agreed, let's go with option C then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tommy
18 days ago
That does make sense, keeping it simple. Option C seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
1 months ago
But wouldn't renaming cause confusion? I prefer option C, replacing application any with [junos-ping junos-ssh] in Rule-1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlesetta
1 months ago
I think option A could work too, just renaming Rule-2 to Rule-0.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vallie
2 months ago
Option C seems like the way to go. Replacing 'any' with the specific applications we need is the most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
2 months ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel