Free Preparation Discussions
MENU
ISTQB Exam ISTQB-CTFL Topic 5 Question 21 Discussion
Topic #: 5
Which or the following would be a key difference between a peer review of code and static analysis of code using a tool?
The key difference between a peer review of code and static analysis of code using a tool lies in their approaches and scope. A peer review is a manual inspection of the code by peers or colleagues, focusing not only on the technical aspects of the code but also on other elements such as design, compliance with standards, and maintainability. Peer reviews can identify defects, suggest improvements, and ensure that the code adheres to best practices and team standards.
On the other hand, static analysis is an automated process performed by tools designed to analyze the code without executing it. These tools can detect potential issues such as syntax errors, vulnerabilities, and code smells based on predefined rules and patterns. While static analysis is technically focused, it lacks the broader perspective that human reviewers can provide, such as evaluating the code's maintainability or adherence to project-specific standards. Therefore, static analysis targets the code technically, whereas peer review encompasses a wider range of aspects, making option B the correct answer.
Cecily
10 months agoKaty
11 months agoFrancisca
10 months agoBenedict
10 months agoCyndy
10 months agoLuther
11 months agoDottie
9 months agoLyda
10 months agoGregoria
10 months agoTy
10 months agoMadonna
10 months agoThaddeus
10 months agoMargurite
11 months agoErin
10 months agoFrankie
10 months agoMagnolia
10 months agoGail
10 months agoEzekiel
11 months agoTonja
11 months agoRhea
11 months agoJamal
11 months ago