Free Preparation Discussions
MENU
ISTQB-CTFL Exam - Topic 5 Question 21 Discussion
Topic #: 5
Which or the following would be a key difference between a peer review of code and static analysis of code using a tool?
The key difference between a peer review of code and static analysis of code using a tool lies in their approaches and scope. A peer review is a manual inspection of the code by peers or colleagues, focusing not only on the technical aspects of the code but also on other elements such as design, compliance with standards, and maintainability. Peer reviews can identify defects, suggest improvements, and ensure that the code adheres to best practices and team standards.
On the other hand, static analysis is an automated process performed by tools designed to analyze the code without executing it. These tools can detect potential issues such as syntax errors, vulnerabilities, and code smells based on predefined rules and patterns. While static analysis is technically focused, it lacks the broader perspective that human reviewers can provide, such as evaluating the code's maintainability or adherence to project-specific standards. Therefore, static analysis targets the code technically, whereas peer review encompasses a wider range of aspects, making option B the correct answer.
Carisa
10 months agoShaquana
10 months agoMoon
10 months agoAshley
11 months agoKimbery
11 months agoCathrine
11 months agoJeanice
11 months agoBette
12 months agoRuthann
12 months agoSalome
12 months agoAlaine
12 months agoGilberto
12 months agoNathan
12 months agoMarquetta
12 months agoJuliann
1 year agoJohnna
1 year agoAja
1 year agoCecily
2 years agoKaty
2 years agoFrancisca
2 years agoBenedict
2 years agoCyndy
2 years agoLuther
2 years agoDottie
2 years agoLyda
2 years agoGregoria
2 years agoTy
2 years agoMadonna
2 years agoThaddeus
2 years agoMargurite
2 years agoErin
2 years agoFrankie
2 years agoMagnolia
2 years agoGail
2 years agoEzekiel
2 years agoTonja
2 years agoRhea
2 years agoJamal
2 years ago