Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISTQB CTAL-TTA Exam - Topic 5 Question 32 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's CTAL-TTA exam
Question #: 32
Topic #: 5
[All CTAL-TTA Questions]

An enhancement to a Social Media application allows for the creation of new Groups. Any number of existing application members can be added to a

Group. An attempt to add a non-existing member of the application to a Group will result in an error. Members can also be removed from an existing Group.

Existing Groups can also be deleted but only if there are no current members attached to it.

Which keyword-driven input table provides an adequate test of this enhancement?

A.

B.

C.

D.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The keyword-driven input table in Option B covers all the necessary scenarios: creating groups, adding members (including handling errors for non-existing members), removing members, and deleting groups only when empty.

This aligns with the functionalities specified in the enhancement description for the social media application.


The ISTQB CTAL-TTA syllabus covers the importance of comprehensive test coverage in keyword-driven testing.

General knowledge on test case design and keyword-driven testing practices.

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Mammie
4 months ago
Is there a reason we can't add non-existing members? Seems limiting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolann
5 months ago
Totally agree with A, it’s straightforward!
upvoted 0 times
...
Misty
5 months ago
Wait, can you really delete a group with members? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veda
5 months ago
I think Option C covers all scenarios better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aron
5 months ago
Option A looks solid for testing group creation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
5 months ago
I recall that we focused on the keywords related to group management, so I should probably look for the option that emphasizes member actions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tabetha
6 months ago
I feel like Option C might be the right choice since it seems to cover the deletion of groups without members, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeniffer
6 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to identify edge cases, like trying to add a non-existing member. That might help here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maxima
6 months ago
I remember we discussed how important it is to test adding and removing members, but I'm not sure which option covers that best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
6 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. I'm leaning towards Option C since it looks like it covers the core functionality of adding and removing members, as well as deleting groups. But I'll double-check the other options just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a good handle on this. The key things I need to test are: 1) Adding members to a group, 2) Trying to add a non-existent member, 3) Removing members from a group, and 4) Deleting a group with no members. I'll carefully review the test cases to see which one best covers all of those.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The requirements mention a few different aspects like adding and removing members, as well as deleting groups. I'll need to make sure I understand how each test case handles those different functionalities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daryl
6 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question. I'll carefully review the requirements and compare them to the test case options to determine which one best covers the key scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynette
1 year ago
That's a good point, Option D does cover all the functionalities of the enhancement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carisa
1 year ago
I think Option D is the most suitable because it includes test cases for adding and removing members.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
1 year ago
But Option A covers all the necessary scenarios, like adding existing and non-existing members.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynette
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe Option C would provide a more comprehensive test.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
1 year ago
I think the keyword-driven input table in Option A would be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
1 year ago
I'm going with Option C. Gotta test all the edge cases, you know? Can't have any bugs slipping through the cracks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
1 year ago
Ha! Option D looks like a complete mess. 'Add members to a group that doesn't exist' - what kind of test is that? Definitely not the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
1 year ago
Hmm, I don't know. Option B seems the most straightforward to me. Why overcomplicate things, right?
upvoted 0 times
Christene
12 months ago
Yeah, Option B seems like the most logical choice. Let's keep it simple.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larue
12 months ago
I think Option B is the way to go too. No need to make it more complicated than it needs to be.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francene
1 year ago
I agree, Option B looks like the best choice. Simple and direct.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Quinn
1 year ago
Option C looks like the most comprehensive test case scenario. It covers adding members, removing members, and deleting groups with different conditions.
upvoted 0 times
Georgene
1 year ago
Let's go with Option C then, it covers all the possible scenarios we need to test.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
1 year ago
I see your point, but I still think Option C is the most comprehensive one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coletta
1 year ago
I think Option A could also be a good choice, it seems to focus on adding and removing members.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twila
1 year ago
I agree, Option C seems to cover all the necessary test cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel