Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB CTAL-TM Exam - Topic 1 Question 17 Discussion

Which statement about defect management in hybrid software development is TRUE?
A) When multiple teams are working to different development models, fixes should be aligned to a separate plan that reflects the characteristics of their development model
B) When multiple teams are working in different development models, they will need to use different defect management tools
C) Defect management meetings should be held more often by teams working in Agile ways than those working in sequential ways
D) Defect management meetings should be held more often by teams working in sequential ways than those working in Agile ways

ISTQB CTAL-TM Exam - Topic 1 Question 17 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's CTAL-TM exam
Question #: 17
Topic #: 1
[All CTAL-TM Questions]

Which statement about defect management in hybrid software development is TRUE?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

A hybrid approach often necessitates flexible planning across development models. Aligning defect fixes to the specific development characteristics ensures clarity and efficiency.

''The way in which defects are logged may vary depending on... the test level and the software development lifecycle model.''

-- ISTQB-CTFL_Syllabus_2018_V3.1, section 5.6


by Annelle at Nov 22, 2025, 10:59 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-TM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Bea
3 months ago
A is the best choice. Flexibility is key in hybrid setups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannan
3 months ago
I lean towards D. Sequential teams need more structure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
3 months ago
I feel C is right. Agile teams need more frequent updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keva
3 months ago
B seems plausible too. Different tools for different models.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mose
3 months ago
I agree, A makes sense. Each model has unique needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
4 months ago
I think A is true. Different models need tailored plans.
upvoted 0 times
...
Breana
4 months ago
I thought all teams used the same tools, this is interesting!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
4 months ago
Wait, D? That sounds off, why would sequential teams meet more?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
5 months ago
C makes sense, Agile teams are always iterating.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
5 months ago
I disagree, B seems more accurate. Different tools are essential!
upvoted 0 times
...
Christoper
5 months ago
Option D? Really? That's the opposite of how it should be. Agile teams are all about rapid feedback and fixing issues early.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
5 months ago
Option C is clearly the right answer. Agile teams need to address defects more frequently than sequential teams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
5 months ago
Option B is just silly. Teams can use the same defect management tools regardless of their development model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
5 months ago
I think option A is correct. Aligning fixes to a separate plan makes sense when teams are using different development models.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
6 months ago
I thought we covered that sequential teams usually have more structured processes, so maybe D is the right choice? I'm not completely confident though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Octavio
6 months ago
I feel like we practiced a question similar to this, and it mentioned Agile teams needing more frequent meetings, which makes me lean towards C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frankie
6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think we talked about how Agile and sequential teams might use the same tools, so B feels off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronna
6 months ago
I'm pretty confident that option D is the correct answer. Defect management is typically more formal and less frequent in sequential development, compared to the more iterative Agile approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
6 months ago
I'm leaning towards option A. When you have multiple teams working in different models, it makes sense that you'd need to align the defect management to account for those differences.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
6 months ago
Okay, let's see. I know that Agile teams tend to have more frequent check-ins and iterations, so option C seems plausible. But I'm not sure if that applies to defect management specifically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kyoko
7 months ago
I remember discussing how different teams might need tailored plans for defect fixes, so A seems plausible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
7 months ago
A is definitely true, teams need to align their plans.
upvoted 0 times
...
Misty
7 months ago
Haha, option D is a joke. Defect management in sequential models? Good luck with that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
8 months ago
I'm not totally sure about this one. I think the key is understanding how the development models affect the defect management process, but I'm not confident in my ability to compare them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
8 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the differences between Agile and sequential development models and how that might impact defect management.
upvoted 0 times
Margart
2 months ago
It’s definitely A. Alignment is key when teams are using different models.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
2 months ago
I disagree, D might be true. Sequential teams have more structured timelines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
3 months ago
I’m leaning towards B. Different tools could help manage defects better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alona
7 months ago
I think A makes the most sense. Different models need tailored plans.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
7 months ago
C seems right. Agile teams are more dynamic, so they need frequent meetings.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel