ISTQB CT-TAE Exam - Topic 2 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's CT-TAE exam

Question #: 39
Topic #: 2

[All CT-TAE Questions]

In order to achieve re-use of a TAS, where SHOULD the design for reuse occur?

AAt the code level

BAt the framework level.

CAt the TAS level

DAt the TAA level

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Clarinda at Sep 19, 2024, 09:44 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CT-TAE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Bettina

3 months ago

Totally agree, TAS level makes the most sense!

upvoted 0 times

...

Kizzy

3 months ago

Wait, are we really saying code level? That seems too low!

upvoted 0 times

...

Kenneth

3 months ago

Not sure about that, isn't it more about the TAA level?

upvoted 0 times

...

Dominga

4 months ago

I think it should be at the framework level.

upvoted 0 times

...

Filiberto

4 months ago

Definitely at the TAS level!

upvoted 0 times

...

Curtis

4 months ago

I feel like it might be at the code level, but I also remember something about the TAS level being crucial. This is tricky!

upvoted 0 times

...

Margo

4 months ago

I'm leaning towards the TAA level, but I can't recall why. It seems like it could be relevant for reuse.

upvoted 0 times

...

Crista

4 months ago

I remember a practice question that emphasized the importance of the framework level for reusability. Maybe that's the right answer?

upvoted 0 times

...

Nada

5 months ago

I think the design for reuse should happen at the TAS level, but I'm not entirely sure. It feels like the most logical place.

upvoted 0 times

...

I'm a little confused on this one. Is the design for reuse supposed to be at the code level, the framework level, the TAS level, or the TAA level? I want to make sure I understand this properly before answering.

upvoted 0 times

...

Justine

5 months ago

Okay, for reuse of a TAS, the design should happen at the TAS level. That makes the most sense to me - the TAS is the core component, so that's where the reusable design needs to be.

upvoted 0 times

...

Freeman

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know reuse is important, but I'm not totally clear on where the design for that should happen. I'll have to think it through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Charisse

5 months ago

This seems like a straightforward question about reusing a TAS. I think the key is to focus on where the design for reuse should occur, so I'll carefully consider the options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Filiberto

5 months ago

I'm a bit unsure about the specifics of LACP and how it applies to the SDX management interface versus the data interface. I'll need to review my Citrix networking knowledge to make sure I understand the differences.

upvoted 0 times

...

Diego

1 year ago

Forget the options, let's talk about how many lines of code it takes to write a TAS. I bet it's more than a hundred, right? *laughs*

upvoted 0 times

...

Filiberto

1 year ago

Hold up, are we sure this isn't a trick question? What if the answer is A) At the code level, and they're just trying to confuse us?

upvoted 0 times

...

Adrianna

1 year ago

I'm going with D) At the TAA level. Gotta think outside the box, you know? The TAS is just the tip of the iceberg.

upvoted 0 times

Cassi

1 year ago

D) At the TAA level could work too, it's all about looking at the bigger picture.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rachael

1 year ago

I agree, C) At the TAS level is also important to ensure components are designed for reuse.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kimi

1 year ago

I think B) At the framework level is the way to go. It sets the foundation for reusability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sarina

1 year ago

Hmm, I'm not so sure. B) At the framework level could also work, since that's where the reusable components would be defined.

upvoted 0 times

Shenika

1 year ago

That's true, but I think focusing on the framework level is more practical.

upvoted 0 times

...

Letha

1 year ago

But wouldn't it also make sense to consider C) At the TAS level?

upvoted 0 times

...

Kallie

1 year ago

Yeah, I agree. That's where the reusable components are defined.

upvoted 0 times

...

Skye

1 year ago

I think B) At the framework level is a good option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paulene

1 year ago

I believe it should be at the TAS level, as that's where the actual re-use will happen.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawna

1 year ago

I agree with Samira, designing for reuse at the framework level makes the most sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Catarina

1 year ago

C) At the TAS level seems like the obvious choice here. That's where the design for reuse should happen, right?

upvoted 0 times

Johnson

1 year ago

I see your point, but focusing on reusability at the TAS level is crucial for overall efficiency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tony

1 year ago

But wouldn't designing for reuse at the code level also be beneficial?

upvoted 0 times

...

Cyril

1 year ago

I think it's important to consider reusability at the framework level as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shaunna

1 year ago

Yes, I agree. Designing for reuse at the TAS level makes the most sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Samira

1 year ago

I think the design for reuse should occur at the framework level.

upvoted 0 times

...