ISTQB Exam CT-TAE Topic 2 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's CT-TAE exam

Question #: 39
Topic #: 2

[All CT-TAE Questions]

In order to achieve re-use of a TAS, where SHOULD the design for reuse occur?

AAt the code level

BAt the framework level.

CAt the TAS level

DAt the TAA level

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Clarinda at Sep 19, 2024, 10:44 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CT-TAE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Charisse

3 days ago

This seems like a straightforward question about reusing a TAS. I think the key is to focus on where the design for reuse should occur, so I'll carefully consider the options.

upvoted 0 times

...

I'm a bit unsure about the specifics of LACP and how it applies to the SDX management interface versus the data interface. I'll need to review my Citrix networking knowledge to make sure I understand the differences.

upvoted 0 times

...

Diego

12 months ago

Forget the options, let's talk about how many lines of code it takes to write a TAS. I bet it's more than a hundred, right? *laughs*

upvoted 0 times

...

Filiberto

1 years ago

Hold up, are we sure this isn't a trick question? What if the answer is A) At the code level, and they're just trying to confuse us?

upvoted 0 times

...

Adrianna

1 years ago

I'm going with D) At the TAA level. Gotta think outside the box, you know? The TAS is just the tip of the iceberg.

upvoted 0 times

Cassi

11 months ago

D) At the TAA level could work too, it's all about looking at the bigger picture.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rachael

12 months ago

I agree, C) At the TAS level is also important to ensure components are designed for reuse.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kimi

12 months ago

I think B) At the framework level is the way to go. It sets the foundation for reusability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sarina

1 years ago

Hmm, I'm not so sure. B) At the framework level could also work, since that's where the reusable components would be defined.

upvoted 0 times

Shenika

11 months ago

That's true, but I think focusing on the framework level is more practical.

upvoted 0 times

...

Letha

11 months ago

But wouldn't it also make sense to consider C) At the TAS level?

upvoted 0 times

...

Kallie

11 months ago

Yeah, I agree. That's where the reusable components are defined.

upvoted 0 times

...

Skye

12 months ago

I think B) At the framework level is a good option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paulene

1 years ago

I believe it should be at the TAS level, as that's where the actual re-use will happen.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawna

1 years ago

I agree with Samira, designing for reuse at the framework level makes the most sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Catarina

1 years ago

C) At the TAS level seems like the obvious choice here. That's where the design for reuse should happen, right?

upvoted 0 times

Johnson

12 months ago

I see your point, but focusing on reusability at the TAS level is crucial for overall efficiency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tony

12 months ago

But wouldn't designing for reuse at the code level also be beneficial?

upvoted 0 times

...

Cyril

1 years ago

I think it's important to consider reusability at the framework level as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shaunna

1 years ago

Yes, I agree. Designing for reuse at the TAS level makes the most sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Samira

1 years ago

I think the design for reuse should occur at the framework level.

upvoted 0 times

...