Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 0d 22h 39m 39s Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB Exam CT-TAE Topic 1 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's CT-TAE exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 1
[All CT-TAE Questions]

You are currently designing the TAA of a TAS. You have been asked to adopt an approach for automatically generating and executing test cases from a model that defines the SUT. The SUT is a state-based and event-driven that is described by a finite-state machine and exposes its functionality via an API. The behavior of the SUT depends on hardware and communication links that can be unreliable.

Which of the following aspects is MOST important when designing the TAA in this scenario?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Stephania at Jun 20, 2024, 05:41 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CT-TAE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Skye
20 days ago
Option A is the way to go, no doubt. I can already imagine the test scripts throwing tantrums whenever the hardware acts up. Gotta be ready for that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
1 months ago
I'm torn between A and D, but I think A takes the cake. Handling exceptions is the real key here, especially with all those unreliable components.
upvoted 0 times
Rosalyn
12 days ago
C) Looking for tools that allow performing setup and teardown of the test suites and the SUT.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marguerita
18 days ago
I agree, handling exceptions is crucial in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
19 days ago
A) Looking for tools that allows direct denoting of exceptions and actions depending on the SUT events.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mitsue
1 months ago
Haha, I bet the test engineers will be having a blast setting up and tearing down the test suites. Option C seems like a practical choice.
upvoted 0 times
Mitsue
17 days ago
User 4: Definitely, it's important for efficient testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
20 days ago
Yeah, setting up and tearing down test suites can be a hassle. Option C does sound like a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freida
25 days ago
User 3: I agree, having tools for setup and teardown is crucial in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hailey
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, option C seems like the way to go for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
1 months ago
User 1: Setting up and tearing down test suites can be a hassle.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bok
1 months ago
Hmm, I'd go with D. Covering use cases and exception cases seems like a better approach than just relying on classification tree coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Esteban
2 months ago
I think option A is the most important aspect here. Being able to handle exceptions and actions based on the SUT's events is crucial when dealing with unreliable hardware and communication links.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
2 months ago
I see both points, but I think looking for tools that allow direct denoting of exceptions and actions depending on the SUT events is the key factor here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannon
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe adopting a test definition strategy based on use case/exception case coverage is crucial in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delila
2 months ago
I think the most important aspect is looking for tools that allow setup and teardown of the test suites and the SUT.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
a