MENU
Which of the following metrics could suggest, under certain condition that an automated regression test suite has NOT been updated for new functionalities added to the SUT?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium CT-TAE Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
38 comments · newest first
CH
Chan
10 months ago
Not sure about D, seems less connected to updates.
EL
Eleni
11 months ago
Totally agree with B, coverage tells a lot.
AU
Audry
11 months ago
Surprised that A is even an option!
DU
Dulce
11 months ago
I think C is more relevant here.
GL
Glenn
11 months ago
B is definitely a key metric to watch.
ME
Melinda
12 months ago
I feel like the SUT code coverage is the most relevant here, especially if new functionalities are added but not covered by tests.
AN
Antonio
12 months ago
The ratio of comments to executable statements seems off to me; I don't see how that would show if the tests are current.
DO
Dominga
12 months ago
I remember a practice question about defect density, but I can't recall if it directly indicates whether the tests were updated for new features.
EM
Emogene
1 year ago
I think the SUT code coverage might be a good indicator, but I'm not entirely sure how it relates to updates in the regression suite.
MO
Mozell
1 year ago
Okay, I think the key here is to focus on metrics that could suggest the regression tests aren't keeping up with new functionality in the SUT. The code coverage of the test suite seems like a good place to start.
NO
Norah
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I'll need to review my notes on regression testing and see if I can figure out which metric would be the best indicator of an outdated test suite.
LA
Laurel
1 year ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different metrics and how they could relate to the regression test suite being out of date.
MY
My
1 year ago
I'm pretty confident that the SUT code coverage provided by the regression test suite is the right answer here. If the coverage is low, it could mean the tests haven't been updated to cover new features.
JE
Jean
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Based on the information given, the correct URL syntax is option A: https://135.xx.xxx.xx:8443/WebLM/LicenseServer. The IP address, port number, and path all seem to match what the question is asking for.
AM
Amie
1 year ago
This seems straightforward. The platform and invocation rate are the two most important factors to consider when specifying a service. I'll select those two options and move on.
GI
Giovanna
1 year ago
I remember that the accrued interest is calculated based on the coupon rate and the time since the last payment. But I'm not sure if it's monthly or yearly for this question.
FL
Fletcher
1 year ago
I'm pretty confident I know the answer to this one. The program will output "I am not empty 10 10" since the vector and deque both have 10 elements.
KR
Kristeen
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The standardized part of a service contract is usually the interface or API, which would be the data model. I'm confident option A is the correct answer.
SH
Shawnee
1 year ago
Choosing D, just because I like the idea of a high ratio of commands to executable statements. Sounds like a fun problem to solve!
DE
Devon
1 year ago
User3: I'm going with C, defect density in automation code seems like a good metric to consider.
MI
Mitzie
1 year ago
User2: I agree with User1, code coverage is a good indicator of test suite updates.
JU
Junita
1 year ago
User1: I think B is the answer, code coverage is important for regression testing.
MA
Mari
1 year ago
I'm going to have to go with B. High code coverage is a good sign that the regression suite is up-to-date.
EL
Elroy
1 year ago
I'm not sure about that, I believe the ratio of comments to executable statements is a better metric to consider.
MA
Marjory
1 year ago
I think the defect density in the automation code could also suggest if the suite has been updated.
LE
Leanora
1 year ago
I agree with you, high code coverage is definitely a good indicator.
JU
Junita
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I was thinking C, but I'm open to other opinions. Anyone else have thoughts?
IL
Ilene
1 year ago
D) The ratio of commands to executable statements in the automation code of the regression test suite
SY
Sylvia
1 year ago
C) The defect density in the automation code of the regression test suite.
BI
Billye
1 year ago
B) The SUT code coverage provided by the execution of the regression test suite.
TH
Theola
1 year ago
A) The ratio of comments to executable statements in the SUT code.
BR
Brent
1 year ago
I'm going with D. The ratio of commands to executable statements in the automation code could suggest the tests haven't been updated.
RO
Rolande
1 year ago
I see your point, but I still believe D is more accurate. The ratio of commands to executable statements directly reflects the test suite's update status.
RO
Rosendo
1 year ago
I think B is a better indicator. Code coverage from the regression tests can show if new functionalities have been tested.
KR
Kristeen
1 year ago
But what about option B) The SUT code coverage provided by the execution of the regression test suite? Wouldn't that also indicate if the test suite has not been updated?
IV
Ivory
1 year ago
I think B is the correct answer. If the regression test suite doesn't cover new functionalities, the code coverage will be low.
AN
Anglea
2 years ago
I agree with Myra. If the automation code has a high defect density, it could suggest that the test suite has not been updated for new functionalities.
MY
Myra
2 years ago
I think the answer is C) The defect density in the automation code of the regression test suite.