Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISTQB Exam CT-TAE Topic 1 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's CT-TAE exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 1
[All CT-TAE Questions]

You have been asked to automate a set of functional tests at system Test level via the CLI of the SUT for the first release of a software system. The automated tests will be delivered to the learn in change of maintenance testing, who will use them for part of the regression testing. They have the following requirements.

1. The automated tests must be as fast and cheap to maintain as possible

2. The cost of adding new automated tests must be as low as possible

3. The automated tests must have a high level of independence from the tool itself

Which of the following scripting techniques would be MOST suitable?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Trina
2 months ago
Keyword-driven scripting is the perfect choice. It's like a secret language that only the test engineers can understand. Shh, don't tell the maintenance team!
upvoted 0 times
Markus
1 months ago
C) Linear scripting
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
2 months ago
B) Keyword-driven scripting
upvoted 0 times
...
Rex
2 months ago
A) Data-driven scripting
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ruthann
3 months ago
Keyword-driven scripting is the way to go! It's like building a LEGO set - you just need to follow the instructions.
upvoted 0 times
Herminia
1 months ago
C) Linear scripting
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
2 months ago
B) Keyword-driven scripting
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
2 months ago
A) Data-driven scripting
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tamie
3 months ago
I'll have to go with keyword-driven scripting. It's like writing a script in plain English, which should make it easy for the maintenance team to understand and update.
upvoted 0 times
Mary
1 months ago
User 4: Data-driven scripting might be too complex and costly to maintain in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
1 months ago
User 3: Plus, it will help in keeping the automated tests independent from the tool itself.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
1 months ago
User 2: Definitely, it will make it easier for the maintenance team to understand and update the tests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
2 months ago
User 1: I agree, keyword-driven scripting sounds like the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ryan
3 months ago
Data-driven scripting seems like a good option too. It can help reduce the cost of adding new tests and make the tests more reusable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thora
3 months ago
I disagree, I think data-driven scripting would be better for independence from the tool itself.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eileen
3 months ago
I agree with Kiley, keyword-driven scripting allows for easy maintenance and low cost of adding new tests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiley
3 months ago
I think keyword-driven scripting would be most suitable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
3 months ago
I think keyword-driven scripting would be the most suitable approach. It aligns well with the requirements of easy maintenance and independence from the automation tool.
upvoted 0 times
Myong
2 months ago
C) Linear scripting
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
3 months ago
B) Keyword-driven scripting
upvoted 0 times
...
William
3 months ago
A) Data-driven scripting
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel