Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB Exam CT-TAE Topic 1 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's CT-TAE exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 1
[All CT-TAE Questions]

Consider a TAS that uses a keyword-driven framework. The SUT is a web application and there is a large set of keywords available for writing the automated tests that relate to highly specific user actions linked directly to the GUI of the SUT. The automated test written with the keywords are statically analyzed by a custom tool which highlight's repeated instances of identical sequence of keywords. The waiting mechanism implemented by the TAS for a webpage load is based on a synchronous sampling within a given timeout. The TAS allows checking a webpage load every seconds until a timeout value

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Glenn at Apr 11, 2024, 09:12 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CT-TAE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Yuki
21 days ago
Wait, did they just say 'keyword-driven framework'? That's so 2010! I bet they're still using a dot-matrix printer, too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruth
24 days ago
Establishing an error recovery process for the TAS and SUT sounds like a great idea. Option D could help us handle any unexpected issues more gracefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
1 months ago
I'm a big fan of data-driven scripting, so option A is definitely appealing. But I wonder if that would really address the root cause of the repeated keyword sequences.
upvoted 0 times
Devon
16 hours ago
A) Changing the scripting approach to data-driven scripting
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rolande
1 months ago
Option C looks interesting, but I'm not sure that switching to explicit hard-coded waits is the best solution. The synchronous sampling approach might have its issues, but it could still be optimized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zena
1 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'm leaning towards option B - implementing keywords with a higher level of granularity. That way, we can avoid repetitive sequences and make the tests more maintainable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Almeta
2 months ago
I prefer option D. Having an error recovery process is crucial for stability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keshia
2 months ago
I agree with Kayleigh. Option B can help improve the accuracy of the automated tests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
2 months ago
I think option B is a good idea. It will make the keywords more specific.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel