MENU
If you are tracking the frequency that a test automation code reports a defect that is not really a defect, what metric are you gathering?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium CT-TAE Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
42 comments · newest first
RO
Rolland
11 months ago
Automation code defect density seems off to me.
CY
Cyril
11 months ago
Wait, are we really calling them "false-fails"? Sounds odd.
WA
Walton
11 months ago
False-fail results are super important to monitor!
LE
Leonie
11 months ago
I think it's more about defect density, though.
DA
Darrin
12 months ago
Definitely tracking false-fail results!
KA
Kaitlyn
12 months ago
I’m a bit confused, but I think trend metrics are more about overall performance rather than specific defect reporting.
AL
Alpha
12 months ago
I feel like I've seen a question like this before, and it was about tracking false positives, which sounds like option D.
MA
Maddie
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about defect density being important. Could it be that?
LU
Luis
1 year ago
I think this might be related to false positives in test automation, so maybe it's about false-fail results?
DE
Dell
1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know Administrators can manage ad accounts, but I'm not sure about the other roles. I'll have to review the material again to be sure.
RO
Ronny
1 year ago
The key here is being able to make changes to perimeters without preventing access to resources. I think the Dry run mode might be the best option.
KA
Kathryn
1 year ago
SD-WAN, that's gotta be it. Viptela and Meraki are both SD-WAN solutions, so the product that combines them must be an SD-WAN offering. I feel confident about this one.
MA
Madelyn
1 year ago
FAT32 and exFAT are older file systems that have limitations on file size and partition size, so those are definitely not the right choices for a 1TB enterprise system. I think NTFS is the way to go, but I'll double-check the details just to be sure.
VA
Valentin
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The correct answer is B - reported as a part of stockholders' equity. I'm pretty confident about that.
BR
Brianne
1 year ago
This question is making me feel like a detective trying to catch the culprit false-fail results. Time to put on my virtual deerstalker cap!
DA
Dacia
1 year ago
C) Trend metrics
RO
Ronny
1 year ago
B) Automation code defect density
LE
Levi
1 year ago
A) Tool scripting metrics
TE
Terrilyn
1 year ago
D all the way! I hate it when my automation code cries wolf. Gotta keep those false alarms in check.
DE
Devorah
1 year ago
D) The number of false-fail results
DA
Daniela
1 year ago
C) Trend metrics
EL
Elfrieda
1 year ago
B) Automation code defect density
AR
Arlette
1 year ago
A) Tool scripting metrics
DA
Daren
1 year ago
D) The number of false-fail results
CL
Clay
1 year ago
C) Trend metrics
CL
Claribel
1 year ago
B) Automation code defect density
TR
Trinidad
1 year ago
A) Tool scripting metrics
LA
Latonia
1 year ago
Hmm, I was leaning towards C) Trend metrics, but I guess that wouldn't capture the false-fail issue specifically. Good catch, everyone!
CR
Cristina
2 years ago
I believe it could also be B) Automation code defect density, as it measures the quality of the automation code in detecting real defects.
AN
Annabelle
2 years ago
I agree, D is the way to go. Gotta keep an eye on those pesky false positives!
LE
Lettie
1 year ago
D) The number of false-fail results
DA
Dana
1 year ago
C) Trend metrics
AB
Abel
1 year ago
Yeah, false positives can really mess up the testing process.
RE
Renea
1 year ago
B) Automation code defect density
YA
Yaeko
1 year ago
I think D is the most important metric to track.
KA
Kattie
1 year ago
A) Tool scripting metrics
TO
Tori
2 years ago
D) The number of false-fail results is the correct answer. We need to track the instances where the automation code reports a defect that doesn't actually exist.
ID
Idella
2 years ago
I agree with Shayne, because tracking false-fail results helps identify areas for improvement in the automation code.
SH
Shayne
2 years ago
I think the answer is D) The number of false-fail results.
PA
Patti
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might also be related to C) Trend metrics to see patterns over time.
FR
Francisca
2 years ago
I agree with Scarlet, because tracking false-fail results can help improve the accuracy of the automation code.
SC
Scarlet
2 years ago
I think the answer is D) The number of false-fail results.