Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB CT-TAE Exam - Topic 1 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's CT-TAE exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 1
[All CT-TAE Questions]

If you are tracking the frequency that a test automation code reports a defect that is not really a defect, what metric are you gathering?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Nichelle at Jul 09, 2023, 09:28 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CT-TAE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Rolland
6 months ago
Automation code defect density seems off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
6 months ago
Wait, are we really calling them "false-fails"? Sounds odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walton
7 months ago
False-fail results are super important to monitor!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonie
7 months ago
I think it's more about defect density, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
7 months ago
Definitely tracking false-fail results!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
7 months ago
I’m a bit confused, but I think trend metrics are more about overall performance rather than specific defect reporting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
7 months ago
I feel like I've seen a question like this before, and it was about tracking false positives, which sounds like option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
8 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about defect density being important. Could it be that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
8 months ago
I think this might be related to false positives in test automation, so maybe it's about false-fail results?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dell
8 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know Administrators can manage ad accounts, but I'm not sure about the other roles. I'll have to review the material again to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
8 months ago
The key here is being able to make changes to perimeters without preventing access to resources. I think the Dry run mode might be the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathryn
8 months ago
SD-WAN, that's gotta be it. Viptela and Meraki are both SD-WAN solutions, so the product that combines them must be an SD-WAN offering. I feel confident about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madelyn
8 months ago
FAT32 and exFAT are older file systems that have limitations on file size and partition size, so those are definitely not the right choices for a 1TB enterprise system. I think NTFS is the way to go, but I'll double-check the details just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
8 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The correct answer is B - reported as a part of stockholders' equity. I'm pretty confident about that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brianne
1 year ago
This question is making me feel like a detective trying to catch the culprit false-fail results. Time to put on my virtual deerstalker cap!
upvoted 0 times
Dacia
12 months ago
C) Trend metrics
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
1 year ago
B) Automation code defect density
upvoted 0 times
...
Levi
1 year ago
A) Tool scripting metrics
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Terrilyn
1 year ago
D all the way! I hate it when my automation code cries wolf. Gotta keep those false alarms in check.
upvoted 0 times
Devorah
11 months ago
D) The number of false-fail results
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
11 months ago
C) Trend metrics
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfrieda
11 months ago
B) Automation code defect density
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
11 months ago
A) Tool scripting metrics
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
12 months ago
D) The number of false-fail results
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
1 year ago
C) Trend metrics
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
1 year ago
B) Automation code defect density
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
1 year ago
A) Tool scripting metrics
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Latonia
1 year ago
Hmm, I was leaning towards C) Trend metrics, but I guess that wouldn't capture the false-fail issue specifically. Good catch, everyone!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristina
1 year ago
I believe it could also be B) Automation code defect density, as it measures the quality of the automation code in detecting real defects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
1 year ago
I agree, D is the way to go. Gotta keep an eye on those pesky false positives!
upvoted 0 times
Lettie
12 months ago
D) The number of false-fail results
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
1 year ago
C) Trend metrics
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
1 year ago
Yeah, false positives can really mess up the testing process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
1 year ago
B) Automation code defect density
upvoted 0 times
...
Yaeko
1 year ago
I think D is the most important metric to track.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
1 year ago
A) Tool scripting metrics
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tori
1 year ago
D) The number of false-fail results is the correct answer. We need to track the instances where the automation code reports a defect that doesn't actually exist.
upvoted 0 times
...
Idella
1 year ago
I agree with Shayne, because tracking false-fail results helps identify areas for improvement in the automation code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
1 year ago
I think the answer is D) The number of false-fail results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patti
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might also be related to C) Trend metrics to see patterns over time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francisca
1 year ago
I agree with Scarlet, because tracking false-fail results can help improve the accuracy of the automation code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scarlet
1 year ago
I think the answer is D) The number of false-fail results.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel