Discuss ISTQB ATM Exam Topic 3 Question 84

Which of the following statements describing the consequences of specifying test conditions at a detailed level is NOT true?

K2 1 credit

AIn an environment where the test basis is continuously changing, it is recommended to specify test conditions at a detailed level in order to achieve a better maintainability

BThe specification of test conditions at a detailed level can be effective when no formal requirements or other development work products are available

CThe specification of test conditions at a detailed level can require the implementation of an adequate level of formality across the team

DFor system testing, the specification of test conditions at a detailed level, carried out early in the project as soon as the test basis is established, can contribute to defect prevention

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium ATM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

24 comments · newest first

Lashandra 2 days ago

Yes, A doesn't fit well with agile practices.

Edelmira 7 days ago

I feel A is the least accurate. Flexibility is key!

Ashton 12 days ago

D sounds good for defect prevention, but timing matters.

Luz 17 days ago

C is spot on. Too much formality can slow us down.

Misty 23 days ago

B seems true. No formal requirements means detail helps.

Lucina 28 days ago

Agreed! A might not help with changing environments.

Melina 1 month ago

I think A is misleading. Detailed conditions can complicate things.

Hyun 1 month ago

I’d go with A too. It doesn’t align with agile practices.

Irving 1 month ago

Yes, A limits adaptability in dynamic projects.

Tegan 2 months ago

I feel like A is the odd one out. It contradicts flexibility.

Alfred 2 months ago

D sounds good for defect prevention, but timing is key.

Buddy 2 months ago

C is spot on. Formality is crucial for clarity.

Irma 2 months ago

B seems true. No formal requirements mean detailed conditions help.

Leota 2 months ago

I agree, A doesn’t fit well with changing environments.

Olene 2 months ago

I think A is misleading. Detailed conditions can complicate things.

Cordie 3 months ago

D) is spot on! Early conditions really do help catch issues before they escalate.

Claribel 3 months ago

C) makes sense, but too much formality can slow things down.

Oretha 3 months ago

Wait, can specifying conditions really prevent defects? Sounds too good to be true.

Jade 3 months ago

Totally agree with B! Detailed conditions help when there's no formal stuff.

Kallie 3 months ago

A) is true, but it can be tricky with changing requirements.

Glory 4 months ago

I vaguely remember that specifying test conditions early can help with defect prevention, so I'm leaning towards option A being the false statement.

Malika 5 months ago

I feel like option C might be the one that's not true since implementing formality can sometimes be counterproductive, but I need to double-check that.

Patrick 5 months ago

I think option B sounds familiar because we practiced a question about testing without formal requirements, but I can't recall if that's true for all scenarios.

Benton 5 months ago

I remember discussing how detailed test conditions can help with maintainability, especially in changing environments, but I'm not sure if that's always the case.

ISTQB ATM Exam - Topic 3 Question 84 Discussion