ISTQB Exam ATM Topic 2 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATM exam

Question #: 49
Topic #: 2

[All ATM Questions]

Which of the following factors could negatively influence a review?

K2 1 credit

AInclude people with the adequate level of knowledge, both technical and procedural

BInclude people who are detail-oriented and scrupulous at finding issues

CInclude as many people as possible in order to have more viewpoints about possible problems on the item under review

DInclude people able to contribute to a clear, thoughtful, constructive and objective discussion

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Ollie at Jun 20, 2024, 04:33 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ATM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Dominga

2 months ago

You know, they say too many cooks spoil the broth. I think that applies here too. Keep it small and focused, not some kind of review free-for-all.

upvoted 0 times

Alfreda

10 days ago

D) Include people able to contribute to a clear, thoughtful, constructive and objective discussion

upvoted 0 times

...

Janine

22 days ago

B) Include people who are detail-oriented and scrupulous at finding issues

upvoted 0 times

...

Carey

1 months ago

A) Include people with the adequate level of knowledge, both technical and procedural

upvoted 0 times

...

Royal

3 months ago

Option B all the way, baby! You want those scrupulous, eagle-eyed reviewers who will leave no stone unturned. Missed issues are the enemy!

upvoted 0 times

Laurel

1 months ago

D) It's important to have people who can contribute to a thoughtful and objective discussion as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherilyn

2 months ago

B) Absolutely, attention to detail is key in a review process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Caprice

2 months ago

A) Include people who are detail-oriented and scrupulous at finding issues

upvoted 0 times

...

Dell

3 months ago

Hmm, I don't know. 'Include as many people as possible'? Sounds like a recipe for chaos. I'd go with D - quality over quantity, every time.

upvoted 0 times

Artie

1 months ago

D is the way to go, it's all about having the right people for a constructive review.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lavera

2 months ago

Definitely, quality discussions are more important than just having a lot of opinions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brock

2 months ago

I agree, having too many people involved can make things messy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Beatriz

3 months ago

Yeah, I'm with you on that one. Quantity over quality is never the way to go. Give me a few detail-oriented folks who really know their stuff any day.

upvoted 0 times

Rolland

28 days ago

D) Include people able to contribute to a clear, thoughtful, constructive and objective discussion

upvoted 0 times

...

Armanda

1 months ago

B) Include people who are detail-oriented and scrupulous at finding issues

upvoted 0 times

...

Sylvia

2 months ago

A) Include people with the adequate level of knowledge, both technical and procedural

upvoted 0 times

...

Tiffiny

3 months ago

Option C? Seriously? That's like trying to solve a problem by just throwing more people at it. No, no, we need a focused, quality review, not some massive free-for-all.

upvoted 0 times