Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB ATM Exam - Topic 2 Question 49 Discussion

Which of the following factors could negatively influence a review?K2 1 credit
B) Include people who are detail-oriented and scrupulous at finding issues
A) Include people with the adequate level of knowledge, both technical and procedural
C) Include as many people as possible in order to have more viewpoints about possible problems on the item under review
D) Include people able to contribute to a clear, thoughtful, constructive and objective discussion

ISTQB ATM Exam - Topic 2 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATM exam
Question #: 49
Topic #: 2
[All ATM Questions]

Which of the following factors could negatively influence a review?

K2 1 credit

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Ollie at Jun 20, 2024, 04:33 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ATM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Buddy
7 months ago
Wait, how could D negatively influence a review? That seems odd!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
8 months ago
B is crucial! We need detail-oriented folks to catch issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Demetra
8 months ago
Really? More viewpoints could just lead to confusion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merrilee
8 months ago
C seems counterproductive, too many cooks spoil the broth!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashunda
8 months ago
A is definitely important for a solid review.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hassie
9 months ago
I thought all the options seemed beneficial, but I guess if too many voices are included, it could lead to chaos. So, maybe option C is the answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
9 months ago
I practiced a similar question where the focus was on the quality of input rather than quantity. I feel like option C might be the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about how having a diverse group can sometimes slow things down. Maybe option C is the one that negatively influences a review?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
9 months ago
I think including too many people could actually complicate the review process. It might lead to confusion rather than clarity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorsey
9 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. Including too many people could lead to a lack of focus and cohesion in the review. I think the best option is to have a smaller, more specialized team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
9 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy here. I'll focus on identifying the option that would introduce the most potential for bias or subjectivity in the review process. That seems like the key to answering this correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawn
9 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure which factor would be the most detrimental. I'll have to think through the pros and cons of each choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
9 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key factors that could negatively impact a review. I'll need to carefully consider each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the relationship between the trusted-publisher mechanism and administrator overrides. I'll need to re-read that part carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
10 months ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. I think I can eliminate a few of the options pretty quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
1 year ago
You know, they say too many cooks spoil the broth. I think that applies here too. Keep it small and focused, not some kind of review free-for-all.
upvoted 0 times
Alfreda
1 year ago
D) Include people able to contribute to a clear, thoughtful, constructive and objective discussion
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
1 year ago
B) Include people who are detail-oriented and scrupulous at finding issues
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
1 year ago
A) Include people with the adequate level of knowledge, both technical and procedural
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Royal
1 year ago
Option B all the way, baby! You want those scrupulous, eagle-eyed reviewers who will leave no stone unturned. Missed issues are the enemy!
upvoted 0 times
Laurel
1 year ago
D) It's important to have people who can contribute to a thoughtful and objective discussion as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherilyn
1 year ago
B) Absolutely, attention to detail is key in a review process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
1 year ago
A) Include people who are detail-oriented and scrupulous at finding issues
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dell
1 year ago
Hmm, I don't know. 'Include as many people as possible'? Sounds like a recipe for chaos. I'd go with D - quality over quantity, every time.
upvoted 0 times
Artie
1 year ago
D is the way to go, it's all about having the right people for a constructive review.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
1 year ago
Definitely, quality discussions are more important than just having a lot of opinions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
1 year ago
I agree, having too many people involved can make things messy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Beatriz
1 year ago
Yeah, I'm with you on that one. Quantity over quality is never the way to go. Give me a few detail-oriented folks who really know their stuff any day.
upvoted 0 times
Rolland
1 year ago
D) Include people able to contribute to a clear, thoughtful, constructive and objective discussion
upvoted 0 times
...
Armanda
1 year ago
B) Include people who are detail-oriented and scrupulous at finding issues
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
1 year ago
A) Include people with the adequate level of knowledge, both technical and procedural
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tiffiny
1 year ago
Option C? Seriously? That's like trying to solve a problem by just throwing more people at it. No, no, we need a focused, quality review, not some massive free-for-all.
upvoted 0 times
Ellen
1 year ago
D) Include people able to contribute to a clear, thoughtful, constructive and objective discussion
upvoted 0 times
...
Matilda
1 year ago
B) Include people who are detail-oriented and scrupulous at finding issues
upvoted 0 times
...
German
1 year ago
A) Include people with the adequate level of knowledge, both technical and procedural
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cristy
1 year ago
But wouldn't having more viewpoints help in identifying potential problems that others might miss?
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleni
1 year ago
I agree with Leatha. Having too many people might lead to conflicting opinions and make it harder to reach a consensus.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
1 year ago
I think including too many people could negatively influence a review.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel