Hey, at least the tester won't be writing code! That's a relief for the developers. Option D sounds like a great way to keep the tester busy and out of trouble.
I'd have to disagree with option B. Executing unit tests is just a small part of the tester's role. Option C is the clear choice here - the tester can really shine during the integration testing phase.
Hmm, I'm not sure the tester would be able to contribute much to unit test development without coding experience. Option D seems like a good fit, where the tester can support the customer in acceptance testing.
I believe the tester would also contribute to planning and executing tests during the integration test phase to detect interface defects, as they have a unique perspective on potential issues.
In an XP team with an inexperienced tester, I think option C would be the best fit. The tester could focus on planning and executing integration tests to catch interface defects, which is a critical role.
Florinda
22 days agoCarey
25 days agoKristofer
2 days agoBettina
1 months agoQuentin
8 days agoSimona
2 months agoBrittni
17 days agoNoel
1 months agoRosendo
2 months agoCarri
2 months agoKristofer
2 months agoShawna
2 months ago