Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB ATM Exam - Topic 2 Question 32 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATM exam
Question #: 32
Topic #: 2
[All ATM Questions]

Consider an agile team adopting Extreme Programming (XP) with five developers and one tester without any coding experience.

To which of the following activities would you expect the tester will contribute most?

K2 1 credit

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Kris at Aug 08, 2023, 11:58 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ATM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Isabelle
4 months ago
I feel like executing unit tests (B) could be a good fit too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiley
4 months ago
Wait, can a tester really contribute to unit tests if they have no coding experience?
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
5 months ago
I’m not so sure about that. What about D?
upvoted 0 times
...
Miss
5 months ago
Definitely agree, C makes the most sense here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
5 months ago
I think the tester would mainly help with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
5 months ago
I keep getting mixed up between options C and D. I know the tester's role is important in both phases, but I can't recall which one they contribute to the most.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lovetta
5 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think supporting the customer in acceptance testing is crucial, so option D seems like a strong contender.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathan
6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like executing unit tests could also be something the tester might help with, especially if they are involved in the testing process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
6 months ago
I remember we discussed how testers usually focus more on integration and acceptance testing rather than unit tests, so I think option C might be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know Splunk has some key components, but I can't quite remember the exact three. I'll have to think it through carefully and review the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veta
6 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure which option is the best approach. I think I'll need to review the cartridge loading order and how the templates are resolved to make a confident decision. Let me take another look at the question and the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the difference between Medicare ACR and the health plan's actual costs. I'll need to re-read the question carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chan
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about which criteria would be most relevant for site acceptance testing of the air quality monitoring system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
10 months ago
Hey, at least the tester won't be writing code! That's a relief for the developers. Option D sounds like a great way to keep the tester busy and out of trouble.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
11 months ago
I'd have to disagree with option B. Executing unit tests is just a small part of the tester's role. Option C is the clear choice here - the tester can really shine during the integration testing phase.
upvoted 0 times
Rolland
9 months ago
D) Supporting the customer in the execution of acceptance testing
upvoted 0 times
...
Latosha
9 months ago
C) Planning and executing tests during the integration test phase to detect interface defects
upvoted 0 times
...
Pedro
9 months ago
B) Executing unit tests
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
10 months ago
A) Developing unit tests
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharan
10 months ago
C) Planning and executing tests during the integration test phase to detect interface defects
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
10 months ago
A) Developing unit tests
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bettina
11 months ago
Option B is the way to go! Let the tester execute the unit tests while the developers focus on writing them. It's a win-win situation.
upvoted 0 times
Regenia
10 months ago
C) Planning and executing tests during the integration test phase to detect interface defects
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
10 months ago
B) Executing unit tests
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
10 months ago
A) Developing unit tests
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Simona
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure the tester would be able to contribute much to unit test development without coding experience. Option D seems like a good fit, where the tester can support the customer in acceptance testing.
upvoted 0 times
Brittni
10 months ago
I agree, but supporting the customer in acceptance testing might be a better fit for them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
11 months ago
I think the tester could still help with developing unit tests.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosendo
11 months ago
I believe the tester would also contribute to planning and executing tests during the integration test phase to detect interface defects, as they have a unique perspective on potential issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carri
11 months ago
In an XP team with an inexperienced tester, I think option C would be the best fit. The tester could focus on planning and executing integration tests to catch interface defects, which is a critical role.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
11 months ago
I agree with Shawna, since the tester's role is to ensure the quality of the code through testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
12 months ago
I think the tester would contribute most to developing unit tests.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel