New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISTQB ATM Exam - Topic 1 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATM exam
Question #: 62
Topic #: 1
[All ATM Questions]

You are the Test Manager of a new project that will have three formal levels of testing. unit, integration and system testing. The testing strategy you decide to adopt a blend of risk-based testing and reactive testing strategies.

Which of the following answers describes the most consistent example of implementation of this test strategy during the execution of the system tests?

K2 1 credit

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Cassie
3 months ago
A is interesting, but I think we need more structure in system testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chana
3 months ago
Wait, are we really trusting users to guide tests? That feels risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
3 months ago
Not sure about C, sounds too scripted for a reactive strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
4 months ago
I agree, C is the most balanced approach!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivan
4 months ago
C seems like the best option, covers risks and allows for exploration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cruz
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the role of user guidance in testing. Does that make option B more valid, or does it detract from the risk-based approach?
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
4 months ago
I think we practiced a question similar to this, and I recall that combining scripted tests with exploratory sessions is a strong strategy. So, option C seems like a solid answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like exploratory testing is important in reactive strategies. Maybe option A is the right choice since it emphasizes that approach?
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
5 months ago
I remember we discussed how risk-based testing focuses on prioritizing tests based on potential impact, so I think option C might align well with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
5 months ago
Ah, this is right up my alley! I'm familiar with session-based test management and exploratory testing, so I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. I'll carefully review the options and select the one that seems to best match the given scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is to identify the option that best aligns with the stated testing strategy of blending risk-based and reactive approaches. I'll need to analyze each option to see which one fits that description.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure about the differences between risk-based and reactive testing strategies, and how they should be implemented during system testing. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
5 months ago
This question seems to be testing my understanding of different testing strategies and how they can be applied in a system testing context. I'll need to carefully consider the details of the scenario and the options provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
1 year ago
Haha, I bet the users are going to love being 'guided' through the system tests. That's going to be a real party, I'm sure.
upvoted 0 times
Gwenn
1 year ago
D) Your test team autonomously performs some exploratory testing sessions and, at the very end of the system testing phase, it also executes more system tests under the guidance of a sample of users
upvoted 0 times
...
Detra
1 year ago
C) Your test team executes scripted tests designed and implemented before the execution of the system test phase, to cover the identified product risks. It also performs exploratory testing sessions throughout the system test phase
upvoted 0 times
...
Latosha
1 year ago
A) Your test team executes exploratory tests following a session-based test management approach throughout the system test phase
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vanda
1 year ago
I agree, Option C seems like the best fit for the described testing strategy. The blend of risk-based and reactive testing is well-represented there.
upvoted 0 times
Colby
1 year ago
Agreed. It ensures thorough coverage while also allowing for flexibility in testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
1 year ago
That's true. It's important to have a balance between scripted tests and exploratory testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zack
1 year ago
I think so too. It covers both identified product risks and includes exploratory testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tess
1 year ago
Option C seems like the best fit for the described testing strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alaine
1 year ago
I prefer option A. Exploratory tests throughout the system test phase provide more flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alton
1 year ago
I agree with Floyd. Scripted tests covering product risks and exploratory testing make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Floyd
1 year ago
I think option C is the most consistent example.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
1 year ago
Option C looks good to me. Covering identified risks with scripted tests and then exploring more throughout the phase sounds like a solid approach.
upvoted 0 times
Alonso
1 year ago
Yes, combining scripted tests for known risks with exploratory testing allows for flexibility and deeper exploration of the system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
1 year ago
It's important to have a balance between planned tests and exploratory testing to ensure thorough testing of the system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
1 year ago
I agree, having a mix of scripted tests for identified risks and exploratory testing provides good coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
1 year ago
Option C looks good to me. Covering identified risks with scripted tests and then exploring more throughout the phase sounds like a solid approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel