New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISTQB ATM Exam - Topic 1 Question 57 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATM exam
Question #: 57
Topic #: 1
[All ATM Questions]

Based on the historical data of 5 past and similar projects, you have calculated these average numbers of defects detected in system testing.

- For each 10000 LOC (lines of code), 200 defects

- For each person-month of development team effort, 49 defects

You want to use this information to perform estimation for a new project.

The project manager tells you that he/she has estimated 20000 new LOC for this new project.

Four developers work for four months on this project before system testing.

During system testing, 797 defects are discovered.

Assume that the system test of this new project is using the same amount of work as spent in the past projects.

Based on this information only, which of the following statement is certainly true about this project? K3 3 credits

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Katlyn
3 months ago
40000 LOC? That sounds like a stretch!
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
3 months ago
The defects seem proportional to the effort, but still concerning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
3 months ago
I’m not so sure about that, could just be a fluke.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammi
4 months ago
Definitely higher defect density, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
4 months ago
Looks like they found way more defects than expected!
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
4 months ago
Based on the defects found, it feels like D might be true since we have more defects than expected, but I need to think more about the defect density part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nada
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the LOC delivered. I thought we were only estimating 20000 LOC, so C seems unlikely, but I’m not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleshia
4 months ago
I think we practiced a question similar to this where we had to relate defects to team effort. It seems like B could be a reasonable assumption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
5 months ago
I remember that defect density is calculated based on the number of defects per LOC, but I'm not sure if we can definitely say the new project has a higher density.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
5 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. Calculating the expected defects and comparing to the actual should give me the answer I need. Just need to be careful with the math.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
5 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to double-check my work to make sure I'm not missing anything. The information provided seems a bit incomplete.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dona
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The key is to use the historical averages for defects per LOC and per person-month to estimate the expected defects, then compare that to the actual 797 defects found.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about how to use the historical data to estimate the defects for this new project. I'll need to think through the logic carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward. I'll start by calculating the expected number of defects based on the historical data and compare that to the actual number found.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the different date formats in the XML structures. I'll need to make sure I understand how to properly extract the year information from each one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
10 months ago
Haha, looks like the project manager needs to work on their estimation skills. Option C is definitely the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
Ressie
8 months ago
Looks like the project manager got it wrong this time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
8 months ago
I agree, the project manager definitely needs to improve their estimation skills.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
8 months ago
Option C) 40000 LOC have been delivered to system testing (against the 20000 LOC planned by the project manager)
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Micaela
10 months ago
I'm not sure about the proportionality between defects and development team effort. Option B doesn't seem to be a certainty based on the given information.
upvoted 0 times
Crista
8 months ago
D) More LOC than planned have been delivered to system testing with a higher defect density than the past projects
upvoted 0 times
...
Audria
9 months ago
C) 40000 LOC have been delivered to system testing (against the 20000 LOC planned by the project manager)
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
9 months ago
B) The number of defects found during the system test phase on the new project is approximately proportional to the development team effort
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
10 months ago
A) The code for the new project contains a higher defect density than the code of the past projects
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Louvenia
10 months ago
Option D seems to be the most accurate statement. The higher number of defects found during system testing suggests a higher defect density compared to past projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patti
10 months ago
But the number of defects found during system testing is not proportional to the development team effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
11 months ago
The project manager seems to have underestimated the LOC for this new project. Option C looks correct based on the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
Lyda
9 months ago
Looks like the new project has more LOC than planned and a higher defect density.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melita
9 months ago
797 defects were found during system testing, which is quite high.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
10 months ago
That means the project manager did underestimate the LOC for this project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabelle
10 months ago
Option C) 40000 LOC have been delivered to system testing (against the 20000 LOC planned by the project manager)
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nickole
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patti
11 months ago
I think the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel