Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB ATM Exam - Topic 1 Question 22 Discussion

Which of the following statements best describes an appropriate approach for managing exploratory testing?Number of correct responses: 1K2 1 credit
C) Define very generic charters to drive exploratory testing sessions of 2 days where testers are completely free to decide what to test
A) Define very detailed mission statements, which allow testing work to be broken into sessions of up to 10 minutes duration in which testing is guided by these mission statements
B) Break the testing work in 30 to 120 minutes sessions and use properly defined mission statements consisting of two or three sentences to guide testing during these sessions
D) Exploratory testing should not be managed because such testing is inherently unmanageable and not measurable

ISTQB ATM Exam - Topic 1 Question 22 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATM exam
Question #: 22
Topic #: 1
[All ATM Questions]

Which of the following statements best describes an appropriate approach for managing exploratory testing?

Number of correct responses: 1

K2 1 credit

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Haydee at Dec 29, 2022, 06:19 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ATM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Golda
8 months ago
I’m surprised people think exploratory testing can’t be managed at all!
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
8 months ago
Wait, 2-day sessions? That sounds excessive...
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
9 months ago
Option D is just wrong; you can manage exploratory testing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
9 months ago
Totally agree, shorter sessions keep focus sharp!
upvoted 0 times
...
Hailey
9 months ago
I think option B makes the most sense for exploratory testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystina
9 months ago
I recall a practice question where we debated whether exploratory testing can be managed at all. I wonder if option D is too extreme.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreta
9 months ago
I feel like defining very generic charters could lead to chaos. But then again, maybe too much structure isn't ideal either?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorita
9 months ago
I think breaking the sessions into 30 to 120 minutes sounds familiar. It seems like a good balance between structure and freedom for testers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zana
9 months ago
I remember we discussed that exploratory testing should have some structure, but I'm not sure if the sessions should be as short as 10 minutes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
9 months ago
Ah, I think I've got this one. "Service Protection" must be referring to the ability of the Traps agent to protect itself from tampering or interference. That makes the most sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
9 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the IoT telemetry requirements to determine the best partition key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
9 months ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. We need to identify the specific indicators that would confirm an SAP has been set up on the account.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
10 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'm not sure if it's an instance of WebLogic Server or something else. I'll need to carefully investigate the situation and consider all the options before deciding on the best course of action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
1 year ago
Option A feels a bit too micromanaged for my taste. I want my exploratory testers to have room to explore, not be in a 10-minute straightjacket.
upvoted 0 times
Jeffrey
1 year ago
User 3: Yeah, option C seems like the best approach for allowing testers to truly explore.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
1 year ago
User 3: Yeah, option C seems like the best approach for allowing testers to truly explore.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
1 year ago
User 2: I think option B strikes a good balance between guidance and freedom.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
1 year ago
User 2: I think option B strikes a good balance between guidance and freedom.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, option A seems too restrictive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, option A does seem too restrictive.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Avery
1 year ago
Whoa, Option C is like letting a toddler loose in a candy store! Exploratory testing needs some guardrails, folks. Option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
1 year ago
Option D is a bold choice! While I respect the sentiment, I think a little structure can actually enhance the value of exploratory testing. I'm sticking with Option B.
upvoted 0 times
Adelina
1 year ago
It's important to have a framework in place to make the most out of exploratory testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrie
1 year ago
I prefer Option B as well, it provides a good balance of structure and flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miss
1 year ago
I think having properly defined mission statements can guide the testing effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martha
1 year ago
I agree, some structure can definitely help in exploratory testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
1 year ago
It's important to strike a balance between freedom and structure in exploratory testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
1 year ago
True, having sessions with clear guidance can make exploratory testing more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jame
1 year ago
I think having properly defined mission statements can guide the testing process effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
1 year ago
I agree, some structure can definitely help in exploratory testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lili
1 year ago
I'm going with Option B as well. Exploratory testing needs a balance of direction and flexibility, and this option strikes that balance nicely.
upvoted 0 times
Chanel
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, having properly defined mission statements for 30 to 120 minute sessions sounds like a good approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
1 year ago
User 1: I think Option B is the way to go for managing exploratory testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kenneth
1 year ago
Option B seems the most reasonable approach. Defined mission statements and sessions of 30-120 minutes allow for structure and guidance, while still leaving room for exploration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reuben
1 year ago
But with C, testers have too much freedom and may miss important areas.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe C is the most appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reuben
1 year ago
I think the best approach is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel