Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB Exam ATA Topic 6 Question 46 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATA exam
Question #: 46
Topic #: 6
[All ATA Questions]

A car navigation system needs to be integrated in the overall car software. Interoperability testing is thus considered to be important. Which of the following techniques is most likely be used to support interoperability tests?

[K2] 1 credit

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Caitlin at Mar 20, 2023, 12:27 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ATA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Alesia
17 days ago
Defect Taxonomies? Sounds like a fancy way of saying 'the cabinet of car software bugs.' I'll stick to Equivalence Partitioning, thanks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystal
21 days ago
Rachel
upvoted 0 times
...
Eugene
22 days ago
Defect Taxonomies? That's a new one. I'm not even sure what that is. Sounds like the kind of answer an examiner would throw in to confuse us.
upvoted 0 times
Hubert
16 hours ago
User 1: I think Defect Taxonomies is about categorizing different types of defects.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willie
26 days ago
Vulnerability Scan? Really? That's more for security testing, not interoperability. I think the answer has to be one of the other options.
upvoted 0 times
Adelina
9 days ago
A: I think the answer is Equivalence Partitioning.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aleshia
2 months ago
I'm not sure about Equivalence Partitioning. Wouldn't Statement testing be a better option to ensure the individual components of the navigation system are working correctly?
upvoted 0 times
Salome
16 days ago
B) Statement testing
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
21 days ago
D: Defect Taxonomies is a classification system for defects, not a technique for interoperability testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
23 days ago
C: Vulnerability Scan is more related to security testing, not specifically for interoperability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
27 days ago
B: Statement testing focuses on testing individual statements or code paths, not necessarily for integration testing like interoperability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jules
30 days ago
A: Equivalence Partitioning is actually used to divide the input data into different partitions for testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenny
30 days ago
A) Equivalence Partitioning
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Soledad
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think Statement testing could also be used for interoperability testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
2 months ago
I agree with Chu, because Equivalence Partitioning helps in testing different input data sets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
2 months ago
Equivalence Partitioning seems like the best choice here. It's a technique that divides the input domain into equivalent classes, which could be really useful for testing the interoperability of the car navigation system.
upvoted 0 times
Chara
14 hours ago
B: Definitely, it's important to test for all possible interactions between different systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanna
3 days ago
A: It's a systematic way to ensure all possible scenarios are covered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
17 days ago
B: Yeah, dividing the input domain into classes can really help with testing the navigation system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lon
29 days ago
A: I think Equivalence Partitioning is the way to go for interoperability testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chu
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) Equivalence Partitioning.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel