Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

iSQI IREB_CPRE_FL Exam - Topic 2 Question 34 Discussion

Validating requirements is one of the main activities of requirements engineering. Which four of the following techniques are suitable for requirements validation? (2 Points)
B) Walk through and H) Validation by using an interface prototype and I) Perspective-based reading and J) Inspection
A) Stakeholder analysis
C) Ranking
D) Monitoring
E) Decomposition
F) Apprenticing
G) Generalization
K) Visualization

iSQI IREB_CPRE_FL Exam - Topic 2 Question 34 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's IREB_CPRE_FL exam
Question #: 34
Topic #: 2
[All IREB_CPRE_FL Questions]

Validating requirements is one of the main activities of requirements engineering. Which four of the following techniques are suitable for requirements validation? (2 Points)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, H, I, J

http://www.certified-re.de/fileadmin/IREB/Lehrplaene/IREB_cpre_syllabus_FL_en_v21.pdf (page 26, first 6 bulleted points on the page)

by Larae at Jun 16, 2022, 09:57 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium IREB_CPRE_FL Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Francine
10 months ago
I always thought decomposition was more about analysis than validation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alysa
10 months ago
C and I are also good options, but not as strong as the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rachael
10 months ago
Wait, is monitoring really a validation technique? Seems off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabina
10 months ago
Totally agree with B and H! They really help clarify requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarita
10 months ago
I think A, B, H, and J are solid choices for validation techniques.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michell
11 months ago
I’m a bit confused about decomposition; it seems more like a technique for breaking down requirements rather than validating them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
11 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I feel like validation by using an interface prototype is a strong candidate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
11 months ago
I remember that walk-throughs are often used for validating requirements, but I'm not sure if they are the only technique we should choose.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberto
11 months ago
I think inspection is definitely one of the techniques, but I can't recall if stakeholder analysis fits in the validation category.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
11 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure about the differences between the options. I'll need to re-read the question and think through each answer choice carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
11 months ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward enough. I'll try option A and see if that does the trick. If not, I'll experiment with the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jillian
11 months ago
This seems like a tricky question. I'll have to review the safety regulations to make sure I answer it correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
11 months ago
The wording of this question is a bit tricky, but I think I can figure it out if I take my time.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel