Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI CTFL_Syll2018 Exam - Topic 7 Question 61 Discussion

Posted by Gearldine on Dec 07, 2022 at 08:57 PM

Which of the following would achieve the HIGHEST level of testing independence for a project's test level?

Suggested Answer: D

Get Premium CTFL_Syll2018 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
43 comments · newest first
FR
Francisca 11 months ago
Outsourcing? That sounds risky!
LA
Layla 11 months ago
A just doesn't cut it for true independence.
AN
Anissa 12 months ago
D is interesting, but can you really avoid bias completely?
VI
Vicky 12 months ago
I think C is actually the way to go!
SH
Shanice 12 months ago
B seems like the best option for independence.
CA
Candida 1 year ago
I feel like training developers to design tests could lead to better tests overall, but it might not achieve true independence like outsourcing or having a separate test team.
LU
Luis 1 year ago
Minimizing contact between testers and developers seems like it could help reduce bias, but I wonder if it might also lead to misunderstandings about the requirements.
SH
Sharen 1 year ago
I remember a practice question that emphasized the importance of having an independent test team. Option C sounds familiar and might be the right choice.
RO
Rory 1 year ago
I think outsourcing test design and execution could provide the highest level of independence, but I'm not entirely sure if that's always the best approach.
DE
Desiree 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. First, I'll need to calculate the after-tax cost of the debt, then I can use that to find the before-tax cost. The key will be incorporating the tax rate and flotation costs correctly.
CO
Corazon 1 year ago
This looks like a straightforward question about the steps required for a multitier deployment. I'm pretty confident I can identify the two correct steps.
KI
Kimberlie 1 year ago
Minimizing contact between testers and developers? Good luck with that! They'll find a way to chat over the coffee machine.
TE
Tequila 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kimberlie
C) Having the company's independent test team design and execute the tests
VE
Veronika 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kimberlie
B) Outsourcing test design and execution to a different company
LE
Lelia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kimberlie
A) Training developers to design good tests for the test team to execute
IL
Iluminada 1 year ago
Ha! Imagine the developers designing their own tests. That's like asking the fox to guard the henhouse!
JO
Joesph 1 year ago
↳ replying to Iluminada
C) Having the company's independent test team design and execute the tests
PA
Paola 1 year ago
↳ replying to Iluminada
C) Having the company's independent test team design and execute the tests
FE
Felix 1 year ago
↳ replying to Iluminada
B) Outsourcing test design and execution to a different company
SH
Sherman 1 year ago
↳ replying to Iluminada
B) Outsourcing test design and execution to a different company
BE
Benton 1 year ago
↳ replying to Iluminada
A) Training developers to design good tests for the test team to execute
RO
Rosalind 1 year ago
↳ replying to Iluminada
A) Training developers to design good tests for the test team to execute
SH
Shalon 1 year ago
I was leaning towards option B, but Alease and Malinda make a good point. You can't beat an independent test team for testing integrity.
JU
Junita 1 year ago
↳ replying to Shalon
D) Minimising contact between testers and developers during test design to avoid bias
MA
Maile 1 year ago
↳ replying to Shalon
C) Having the company's independent test team design and execute the tests
EV
Eve 1 year ago
↳ replying to Shalon
B) Outsourcing test design and execution to a different company
AN
Anisha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Shalon
A) Training developers to design good tests for the test team to execute
VI
Vivienne 1 year ago
↳ replying to Shalon
D) Minimising contact between testers and developers during test design to avoid bias
AL
Allene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Shalon
C) Having the company's independent test team design and execute the tests
AL
Alva 1 year ago
↳ replying to Shalon
B) Outsourcing test design and execution to a different company
RE
Rebecka 1 year ago
↳ replying to Shalon
A) Training developers to design good tests for the test team to execute
DE
Desmond 2 years ago
I believe minimizing contact between testers and developers during test design could lead to important information being missed.
MA
Malinda 2 years ago
I agree with Alease. A truly independent test team is the way to go. Anything less and you risk bias creeping in.
KA
Kami 1 year ago
↳ replying to Malinda
D) Minimising contact between testers and developers during test design to avoid bias
TA
Tammara 1 year ago
↳ replying to Malinda
Outsourcing can also provide a high level of independence in testing.
LA
Lavonda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Malinda
B) Outsourcing test design and execution to a different company
KA
Kanisha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Malinda
I agree, having an independent test team is crucial for unbiased testing.
SO
Solange 1 year ago
↳ replying to Malinda
D) Minimising contact between testers and developers during test design to avoid bias
RA
Rasheeda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Malinda
C) Having the company's independent test team design and execute the tests
LE
Leota 1 year ago
↳ replying to Malinda
C) Having the company's independent test team design and execute the tests
AL
Alease 2 years ago
Option C seems like the best choice to me. Having an independent test team design and execute the tests is the surest way to achieve true testing independence.
CH
Chu 2 years ago
I agree with Blondell. Outsourcing test design and execution to a different company may introduce communication issues.
BL
Blondell 2 years ago
I think having the company's independent test team design and execute the tests would achieve the highest level of testing independence.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel