New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

iSQI CTFL_Syll2018 Exam - Topic 4 Question 8 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTFL_Syll2018 exam
Question #: 8
Topic #: 4
[All CTFL_Syll2018 Questions]

You are performing a review of your colleague's test cases based on the following test basis document:

The Test Cases are as follows:

TC1. Success -- valid 'User Name' and 'Password'; Customer Menu displayed

TC2. Failure -- 'User Name' field has blank entry; Error Number 12 displayed

TC3. Failure -- 'User Id' entered does not exist on database (i.e. unregistered user); Error Number 23 displayed

TC4. Failure -- 'Password' entered does not match user's password on database; Error Number 24 displayed

You are guided by the following checklist in your review:

C1. There must be one test case to cover success

C2. There must be one test case for each error path (e.g. validation failure)

C3. Each test case must use terminology consistent with the test basis document (field names, error numbering, etc.)

Record a separate defect for each missing test case (checklist items C1 and C2) and for each test case that does not meet checklist item C3.

How many defects should you record?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Selma at May 05, 2022, 06:32 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTFL_Syll2018 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Katina
4 months ago
So, that’s 3 defects total based on the checklist, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure about the error numbers? They seem off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
4 months ago
I think TC3 and TC4 are fine, but what about the terminology?
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
4 months ago
Totally agree, we definitely need a test for every error path!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
5 months ago
There’s one success case, but we need more for the errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delpha
5 months ago
I think there are three defects total: one for the missing success case and two for the error paths. But I need to double-check the terminology consistency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
5 months ago
I feel like TC1 covers the success case, but I'm uncertain if TC2 and TC3 meet the error path requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
5 months ago
I remember we discussed that we need one success case and one for each error path, so that makes at least two defects for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
5 months ago
I think we need to record defects for the missing test cases, but I'm not sure if we have to count the terminology issues too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
5 months ago
This is a good question to test our understanding of the WLAN planning process. I think the key is to focus on the specific work content that changes between the pre-sales and after-sales stages. Time to put on my thinking cap!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
5 months ago
I think the key here is ensuring the same next-hop from both PE1 and PE2. That seems like the critical element for BGP PIC to function properly. I'll focus on that as I evaluate the answer choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
5 months ago
From what I studied, I think Neely's comments make sense because linking dividends to available funds could increase investment opportunities. But I'm unsure if it really would lower the cost of equity as he claims.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel