MENU
It is recommended to perform exhaustive tests for covering all combinations of inputs and preconditions.
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium CTFL_Syll2018 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
KE
Keneth
11 months ago
Including exit combinations is a must for thorough testing!
RO
Royal
11 months ago
Wait, are we really saying all combinations? That sounds impossible!
AH
Ahmed
11 months ago
I think risk analysis is more practical for most projects.
CH
Charlesetta
11 months ago
Totally agree! You can't skip any combinations if you want quality.
MA
Maile
12 months ago
Exhaustive testing covers all scenarios, but it's super time-consuming.
SH
Shawna
12 months ago
I vaguely remember something about only expert testers being able to conduct exhaustive tests, but I’m not entirely confident about that.
PE
Peggy
12 months ago
I feel like covering all exit combinations is important, but I can't recall if that was part of the exhaustive testing strategy we studied.
MO
Mozell
1 year ago
I think we practiced a question similar to this, and I leaned towards prioritizing risk analysis instead of exhaustive testing.
HI
Hildred
1 year ago
I remember we discussed that exhaustive testing can be really time-consuming, so I'm not sure if it's always the best approach.
MA
Mattie
1 year ago
Option D is a bit concerning. Exhaustive testing shouldn't be limited to just the experts. We all need to contribute to ensure thorough coverage.
SA
Sanda
1 year ago
I think option C is the way to go. Covering all the exit combinations is just as important as the inputs.
GO
Goldie
1 year ago
Definitely option B. Prioritizing risks and focusing the testing efforts is more efficient than trying to cover every single combination.
EV
Evan
1 year ago
I'm not sure about this one. Exhaustive testing seems like a lot of work, but I don't want to miss anything important.
LA
Larae
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording here. Let me re-read the question and see if I can figure out the best approach.
AN
An
1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure about the drop-down menus; they seem useful but can also get cluttered. Did we practice anything specific on their effectiveness?
TA
Tammy
1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. Should I be looking at the validation data or a separate held-out dataset? I'll need to think this through carefully.
JA
Janella
1 year ago
Only expert testers can do exhaustive tests? Hah! I'm pretty sure even the experts would draw the line at that level of madness.
LY
Lyla
1 year ago
C) Yes, and it's also necessary to include all the exit combinations
KR
Kristin
1 year ago
B) No, risk analysis and priorities should be used to focus testing efforts
VI
Vi
1 year ago
A) Yes, it's strongly recommended.
EV
Evelynn
1 year ago
Covering all combinations? That's a tall order. I'd love to see the test plan that can pull that off without going completely insane.
TE
Tess
1 year ago
C) Yes, and it's also necessary to include all the exit combinations
DE
Delmy
1 year ago
B) No, risk analysis and priorities should be used to focus testing efforts
ON
Ona
1 year ago
A) Yes, it's strongly recommended.
VE
Veronica
1 year ago
But wouldn't risk analysis help focus testing efforts better?
RO
Rosann
2 years ago
I agree with Jacinta, it's strongly recommended.
LA
Lavelle
2 years ago
Option B is the way to go. We need to be strategic and focus on the high-risk areas, not just blindly test everything.
JO
Josephine
1 year ago
B) No, risk analysis and priorities should be used to focus testing efforts
RE
Regenia
1 year ago
A) Yes, it's strongly recommended.
ME
Meaghan
1 year ago
B) No, risk analysis and priorities should be used to focus testing efforts
MA
Marva
1 year ago
A) Yes, it's strongly recommended.
JA
Jacinta
2 years ago
I think it's important to perform exhaustive tests.
DI
Dierdre
2 years ago
I disagree. Risk analysis and priorities should be used to focus testing efforts on critical areas first.
TR
Tresa
2 years ago
Exhaustive testing? Sounds like a recipe for never-ending test cycles and burnout. Let's be realistic here.
WI
William
2 years ago
Yes, it's strongly recommended. We need to cover all possible scenarios to ensure thorough testing.
AL
Alishia
2 years ago
Do you think we should perform exhaustive tests for all combinations?