MENU
Consider the following Pseudo code:
How many minimum lea cases are required to cover 100% Statement coverage and Decision coverage?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium CTFL_Syll2018 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
28 comments · newest first
JU
Judy
11 months ago
How can it be 5 for Decision? That’s surprising!
CE
Cecil
11 months ago
I disagree, I feel like 2 for Statement is too low.
ST
Stanford
11 months ago
Wait, 5 for Decision? That seems way too high.
MA
Maybelle
11 months ago
Definitely going with option B!
CL
Clorinda
12 months ago
I think it's 1 for Statement and 2 for Decision.
GA
Gary
12 months ago
I believe we need 5 cases for decision coverage, but I’m not entirely confident. I should have reviewed the definitions again before the exam.
TA
Tanja
12 months ago
I’m confused about how many cases we need for decision coverage. I thought it was just one, but I feel like it could be more based on the branches.
JO
Johnetta
1 year ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to analyze decision points. I think we might need at least two cases for decision coverage.
AU
Augustine
1 year ago
I think for statement coverage, we only need one test case, but I'm not sure about the decision coverage. It feels like it could be more.
LA
Laura
1 year ago
I think I know the answer here. The inputs are things like requirements, constraints, and potential solutions, but decision analysis is more of an overall process, not a specific input. I'll go with that.
TH
Theola
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I know the Global Access Policy has something to do with application visibility and control, but I can't remember the exact default action. I'll have to think this through carefully.
JU
Juliann
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'm trying to decide between options B and D. I'm leaning towards D since it seems more flexible, but I'll need to double-check the details on how validation rules work in this context.
AS
Ashanti
1 year ago
Ah, the age-old battle of statement vs. decision coverage. My money's on B, but I wouldn't be surprised if they threw a curveball.
IS
Isaiah
1 year ago
Yeah, B makes sense to me too.
CA
Cary
1 year ago
I agree, B seems like the most logical choice.
KA
Kaycee
1 year ago
I think B is the right answer.
LA
Lacey
1 year ago
Haha, I bet the answer is D just to mess with us. Software testing has a weird sense of humor sometimes.
RE
Reena
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards C. 5 for statement coverage and 1 for decision coverage seems more logical.
JE
Jesse
1 year ago
Yeah, it's important to have thorough coverage to catch any potential issues.
RO
Rolande
1 year ago
I agree, having more test cases for statement coverage ensures that all statements are executed at least once.
FA
Fabiola
1 year ago
Yes, having 5 test cases for statement coverage seems like a good approach to achieve 100% coverage.
CL
Clorinda
1 year ago
I think C is the correct answer too. It makes sense to have more test cases for statement coverage.
LA
Lashonda
1 year ago
I agree, having more test cases for statement coverage ensures that all statements are executed.
LE
Lemuel
1 year ago
I think C is the correct answer too. It makes sense to have more test cases for statement coverage.
EV
Eva
1 year ago
This question is tricky. I think the answer is B, but I'm not sure. Need to double-check the coverage criteria.
MI
Micaela
1 year ago
But if we cover all statements and decisions, we need to consider the minimum number of test cases required for both. So, A seems more logical to me.
FR
Frederica
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) 2 for Statement, 5 for Decision.
MI
Micaela
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) 1 for Statement, 5 for Decision.