iSQI CTFL_Syll2018 Exam - Topic 2 Question 102 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTFL_Syll2018 exam

Question #: 102
Topic #: 2

[All CTFL_Syll2018 Questions]

You are responsible for applying the correct technique (or a review of the requirements document for a project to develop a new software application. You identify the reviewers and the required roles, including the meeting leader, who is the requirements document author, and a separate role for a scribe. Additionally, you decide to take a relatively informal approach to the requirements review. The goal of the review is to find defects in the requirements document, such as omissions, inconsistencies, and duplications. Another goal of the review is to improve the software application's usability and accessibility by considering the various stakeholders' viewpoints.

Which of the following statements BEST describes this scenario?

AThis scenario is using a pair review type and a perspective-based review technique

BThis scenario is using a walkthrough review type and a perspective-based review technique

CThis scenario is using a walkthrough review type and a checklist-based review technique

DThis scenario is using a pair review type and a checklist-based review technique

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

This scenario is using a walkthrough review type and a perspective-based review technique. A walkthrough is a type of review that is relatively informal and led by the author of the work product. A perspective-based review technique is a technique that involves reviewing the work product from different viewpoints or perspectives of various stakeholders. The scenario matches these descriptions, as it involves an informal approach, a meeting leader who is the author of the requirements document, and a goal of improving the software application's usability and accessibility by considering the various stakeholders' viewpoints. Option A is incorrect, as a pair review is a type of review that involves only two people, usually the author and another team member. Option C is incorrect, as a checklist-based review technique is a technique that involves reviewing the work product against a predefined list of items or criteria. Option D is incorrect, as it combines the incorrect descriptions of options A and C.

by Princess at Nov 19, 2024, 02:52 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTFL_Syll2018 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Tamekia

3 months ago

Nope, I think it's a pair review type.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlen

3 months ago

I think it's a walkthrough too, but I'm surprised it's informal.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daniel

3 months ago

Wait, isn't this more of a checklist-based review?

upvoted 0 times

...

Gwenn

4 months ago

I agree, definitely a perspective-based approach!

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherry

4 months ago

Sounds like a walkthrough review to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laurel

4 months ago

I keep mixing up the terms. I thought pair reviews were more about two people working together, but this scenario involves a group, so it might lean towards a walkthrough.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dewitt

4 months ago

I thought a checklist-based review was more structured, but this seems more about gathering perspectives. Maybe it's a perspective-based walkthrough?

upvoted 0 times

...

Ruby

4 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like the informal approach suggests it's more of a walkthrough. I think we practiced a similar question about identifying review types.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mariann

5 months ago

I remember we discussed the differences between walkthroughs and pair reviews in class. I think this might be a walkthrough since it involves a group reviewing the document together.

upvoted 0 times

...

Billy

5 months ago

I'm not sure about this one. The details about the roles and goals seem to match both the walkthrough and perspective-based review types. I'll need to re-read the question and options carefully to decide which one best fits the scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gussie

5 months ago

Okay, I've got it. This is a walkthrough review using a perspective-based technique. The informal approach, focus on finding defects, and consideration of different stakeholder viewpoints all fit with that. I feel pretty confident about this one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharen

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused. The scenario mentions a requirements document author and a separate scribe role, which makes me think it could be a walkthrough review. But the goal of improving usability and accessibility also sounds like a perspective-based review. I'll need to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daron

5 months ago

I think this is a perspective-based review, since the goal is to consider different stakeholder viewpoints. The informal approach and focus on finding defects like omissions and inconsistencies also points to a walkthrough review type.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ivette

1 year ago

Ha, I bet the person who wrote this question was having a bit of fun. 'Relatively informal approach to the requirements review' - sounds like they're trying to keep the reviewers on their toes!

upvoted 0 times

...

Suzi

1 year ago

I'm going with Option B. The scenario sounds like a classic walkthrough review with a focus on different perspectives, which is exactly what a perspective-based review technique is all about.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kenda

1 year ago

Hmm, this is a tough one. I was initially thinking Option D, but the mention of considering various stakeholder viewpoints makes me think Option B is the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

Xuan

1 year ago

Yes, let's go with Option B for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jamey

1 year ago

So, we are leaning towards Option B then?

upvoted 0 times

...

Glennis

1 year ago

I agree, considering stakeholder viewpoints is a key aspect of a walkthrough review type.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nina

1 year ago

I think Option B is the correct answer because of the mention of considering various stakeholder viewpoints.

upvoted 0 times

...

Georgeanna

1 year ago

I agree, considering stakeholder viewpoints is important in this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tiera

1 year ago

I think Option B is the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lynette

1 year ago

I'm leaning towards Option C. The walkthrough review type is mentioned, and the checklist-based technique where specific defects are looked for matches the goals of the review.

upvoted 0 times

Hildegarde

1 year ago

It seems like Option C is the best choice for this scenario. It covers both the review type and technique needed for the project.

upvoted 0 times

...

Broderick

1 year ago

The walkthrough review type mentioned in Option C would also allow for a thorough examination of the document.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nana

1 year ago

I agree, the checklist-based technique would help in identifying specific defects in the requirements document.

upvoted 0 times

...

Micheal

1 year ago

I think Option C makes sense. The walkthrough review type and checklist-based technique align with the goals of the review.

upvoted 0 times

...

Helga

1 year ago

I'm not sure, but I think A) This scenario is using a pair review type and a perspective-based review technique could also be a valid option, as pair reviews involve two people working together to find defects.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elinore

1 year ago

I agree with Laurena, because in a walkthrough review, the author leads the review and the focus is on understanding the requirements from different perspectives.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laurena

1 year ago

I think the answer is B) This scenario is using a walkthrough review type and a perspective-based review technique.

upvoted 0 times

...

Loreta

1 year ago

Option B seems like the best fit here. The scenario mentions a walkthrough review, which involves the author presenting the requirements document to a group of reviewers. And the perspective-based review technique where different stakeholder viewpoints are considered aligns with the goals described.

upvoted 0 times