New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI CTFL_Syll2018 Exam - Topic 1 Question 91 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTFL_Syll2018 exam
Question #: 91
Topic #: 1
[All CTFL_Syll2018 Questions]

You are testing a mobile app that displays a person's status in respect of Covid-19. There are five possibilities: Fully Vaccinated, Partly Vaccinated, Infected & Recovered. Last Tested Positive or Last Tested Negative. You have found that, after receiving data about successful administration of a second injection, the person's status has not changed from Partly Vaccinated to Fully Vaccinated, although it should have done. The project uses a popular proprietary defect management tool where you have drafted an incident report with the following information:

* Test id., test environment used and date/time of run

* Expected and actual results with steps to reproduce.

* Severity level 4 (Critical - an entire functional area is unusable)

* Version data for the application under test and the testware that was used

Which one of the following important items of information is missing?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Priority is an important item of information that is missing from the incident report. Priority indicates the importance or urgency of resolving the incident, based on the business needs and the impact on the stakeholders. Priority is usually assigned by the project manager or the customer, and it helps to determine the order in which incidents should be addressed. Priority may differ from severity, which indicates the degree of impact of the incident on the system or the component under test. Severity is usually assigned by the tester or the developer, and it helps to assess the risk of the incident. For example, an incident may have a high severity but a low priority, if it affects a critical function but only occurs in a rare situation. Conversely, an incident may have a low severity but a high priority, if it affects a minor function but occurs frequently or affects many users. Therefore, both priority and severity are useful information for incident management and resolution.

The other options are not essential information for the incident report, although they may be helpful or desirable in some cases. Recommendations are suggestions or proposals for resolving the incident, which may be provided by the tester, the developer, or other stakeholders. However, recommendations are not mandatory, and they may not be feasible or acceptable in some situations. Name of tester is the identifier of the person who reported the incident, which may be useful for communication or accountability purposes. However, name of tester is not critical, and it may be replaced by other identifiers, such as email address, employee number, or role. Change history is the record of the changes made to the incident report, such as status, resolution, or comments. Change history is valuable for tracking and auditing purposes, but it is not part of the initial incident report, rather it is updated as the incident progresses.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Caren
3 months ago
Recommendations could help, but I agree with the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tran
3 months ago
Definitely need to include change history for context.
upvoted 0 times
...
In
3 months ago
Wait, how did they miss that? Seems like a basic oversight.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
4 months ago
I think priority info is crucial too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maricela
4 months ago
Missing the name of the tester is a big deal!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
4 months ago
Change history seems relevant too, but I can't recall if it was specifically mentioned as necessary in our training.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
4 months ago
I’m a bit uncertain, but I feel like recommendations could be important for guiding the next steps after identifying a critical issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
4 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question about missing information in defect reports, and I feel like priority might be crucial for this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alfreda
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of including the tester's name in incident reports, but I'm not sure if that's the missing item here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aimee
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure which piece of information is missing, but I'll carefully consider each option and try to eliminate the ones that are clearly present in the incident report details. Gotta stay focused and not overthink it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about what the "important item of information" they're asking for could be. I'll need to carefully read through the options to see which one seems to be missing from the incident report details provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward incident report question. I'll focus on making sure I have all the required information covered, like the test environment, steps to reproduce, and version details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key here is to identify the piece of information that's not listed in the incident report details. Based on the options, I'd say the missing item is the priority level, since that's not explicitly mentioned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glennis
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. Reducing latency is the key here, so I'm guessing the answer has to do with improving the signal transmission or processing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deonna
2 years ago
I think the Name of Tester is not as critical as Priority or Recommendations in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louann
2 years ago
I believe Recommendations could also be important to suggest potential solutions for the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenore
2 years ago
I agree with Fairy, Priority is crucial for determining the order in which issues should be fixed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
2 years ago
Hmm, I'd say Change History is also important. We need to know the history of updates to the app to properly investigate this problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
2 years ago
I agree, Priority is the key piece of information missing here. Without it, the project team won't know how urgently to address this issue.
upvoted 0 times
Izetta
2 years ago
C) Priority
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
2 years ago
B) Name of Tester
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
2 years ago
A) Recommendations
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
2 years ago
C) Priority
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
2 years ago
B) Name of Tester
upvoted 0 times
...
Una
2 years ago
A) Recommendations
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fairy
2 years ago
I think the missing item is Priority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanesha
2 years ago
The missing item is definitely Priority. How can we fix a critical issue without knowing the priority?
upvoted 0 times
Lottie
2 years ago
We should definitely make sure to include the priority in the incident report for better clarity and resolution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
2 years ago
You're right, without knowing the priority, it's hard to determine how urgent the issue is.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel